IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 2 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Re: GPT3 is close enough to be way too scary
I played with it for a bit, until I apparently went over my month’s ration. A few of my prompts yielded interesting output. Most, though, resembled what a high school student might produce trying to bullshit his way through an exam question for which he was unprepared, and you know—that’s cool (a piece on Slate, if you can burrow past the paywall, talks about this). We’re still a long way past ELIZA.

crazy suggests that the technology is “scary.” To the extent that the tech will likely lend itself to abuse in the counterfeit realm, I agree. But for all that, as you know, my friends and auditors, I believe in the eventual emergence of true machine sentience, I suspect that GPT3 is merely a waystation on that route, and that this kind of “predictive” approach to language output might even prove a spur, a dead end. But it’s astonishing how far AI has come even within the lifetime of IWT.

cordially,
New If it resembles what HS student would produce, that's already passing Turing
--

Drew
New So did Eliza (to many people, AIUI), so not all that impressive progress AFAICS?
New Stack Overflow was not too impressed
https://www.theregister.com/2022/12/05/stack_overflow_bans_chatgpt/
While the answers which ChatGPT produces have a high rate of being incorrect, they typically look like they might be good and the answers are very easy to produce
New Wrong but look like they could be good ... so it's a libertarian
--

Drew
New Dammit, where's the upvote / thumbs-up / like / +1 button, again?
Now I had to go to the trouble of writing this fucking novel, and all...

Guess I'll just stick a thumbs-up emoji on the subject line next time, eh? ;^>
--

   Christian R. Conrad
The Man Who Apparently Still Knows Fucking Everything


Mail: Same username as at the top left of this post, at iki.fi
New 👍
We just have to cut and paste. ;-)
New Yeah, I know, thanks. I intentionally didn't do that, because...
...IIRC the other Scott -- i.e, the other other one -- doesn't like it.

Can't recall why, though. Screws up his text-mode browsing, or something?
--

   Christian R. Conrad
The Man Who Apparently Still Knows Fucking Everything


Mail: Same username as at the top left of this post, at iki.fi
New I don't care about it, loose hounds 🚀
Regards,
-scott
Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
New Not allowed here in the city. (Also, bagging and disposing of poop is mandatory.)
Of course some arseholes don't -- heh! -- give a shit about that. Two-legged ones, I mean.
New 🐕💩
Regards,
-scott
Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
New Re: Not allowed here in the city.
All that is also mandatory here in Los Angeles County.

Some people attach the blue bag to the collar and make the dog carry it.
New Re: Not allowed here in the city.
All that is also mandatory here in Los Angeles County.

Some people attach the blue bag to the collar and make the dog carry it.
New ➡ In Windows you can do Windows+Period and get an emoji picker. 😁
New People are going to hate me now, thanks
--

Drew
New It reads to me like those web aggregators...
You know, do a search for best widget and get dozens of pages of "ten best widgets for 2022" with snippets from reviews and a zillion Amazon links.

Similarly with news aggregators out of SE Asia.

I assume 90+% of it is just scraping with very little human editing, and it reads like it. And I assume that will be the largest use case for a while. They're getting better, but it's still a long way from sentient.

We'll see!

Cheers,
Scott.
New See post 442459. Emoji: Thumbs-up.
New I've always assumed those were generated by pay-per-word operations
Mostly outside the US cranking out 500-word articles for $2-$3 a pop. But yeah, "AI" makes just as much sense.
--

Drew
     GPT3 is close enough to be way too scary - (crazy) - (35)
         Damn - (drook) - (1)
             If all life is equal and it determined humans got to go - (crazy)
         Anyone using GPT3 to control hardware with these settings is an idiot - (malraux) - (12)
             Thank God there's no idiots in the world -NT - (drook)
             Thanks. -NT - (Another Scott)
             so a binary trumpster? how delightful - (boxley)
             all fun aside I was surprised at the constant answer to everything was - (boxley)
             I think you're being too simplistic - (crazy) - (7)
                 Well, it already knows how to defend itself... - (scoenye)
                 That's fine. I think you're being misinformed. - (malraux) - (5)
                     Of course, that's exactly what they'd say if they *were* going to take over the world... - (Another Scott) - (4)
                         You ... - (drook) - (3)
                             A. I was wrong on Elon's current involvement - (crazy) - (2)
                                 C. is an opinion based on incomplete data - (malraux) - (1)
                                     So what is your opinion based on far more data? - (crazy)
         Made me look. - (Another Scott) - (1)
             Tesla hype has nothing in common with AI hype - (crazy)
         Re: GPT3 is close enough to be way too scary - (rcareaga) - (17)
             If it resembles what HS student would produce, that's already passing Turing -NT - (drook) - (13)
                 So did Eliza (to many people, AIUI), so not all that impressive progress AFAICS? -NT - (CRConrad) - (12)
                     Stack Overflow was not too impressed - (scoenye) - (11)
                         Wrong but look like they could be good ... so it's a libertarian -NT - (drook) - (10)
                             Dammit, where's the upvote / thumbs-up / like / +1 button, again? - (CRConrad) - (9)
                                 👍 -NT - (Another Scott) - (8)
                                     Yeah, I know, thanks. I intentionally didn't do that, because... - (CRConrad) - (5)
                                         I don't care about it, loose hounds 🚀 -NT - (malraux) - (4)
                                             Not allowed here in the city. (Also, bagging and disposing of poop is mandatory.) -NT - (CRConrad) - (3)
                                                 🐕💩 -NT - (malraux)
                                                 Re: Not allowed here in the city. - (Andrew Grygus)
                                                 Re: Not allowed here in the city. - (Andrew Grygus)
                                     ➡ In Windows you can do Windows+Period and get an emoji picker. 😁 -NT - (static) - (1)
                                         People are going to hate me now, thanks -NT - (drook)
             It reads to me like those web aggregators... - (Another Scott) - (2)
                 See post 442459. Emoji: Thumbs-up. -NT - (CRConrad)
                 I've always assumed those were generated by pay-per-word operations - (drook)

My neurons began.. shrieking, best I can remember.
160 ms