IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New That's fine. I think you're being misinformed.
I work with this on a daily basis as part of my day job. I'll take my understanding of it over that of sensationalist videos trying to sell online classes.

There is no way they're dedicating personnel on the instrumentation side rather than the make progress side.
They absolutely are, and we've talked to them on a daily basis.

Predictive text tokenization has nothing to do with the answers it comes up with on the way out. That's all about reading the input.
Completely wrong.

Latest text model with temp of 0.7 (very creative), and with probability annotations on:


Exact same prompt, note the different response:


Turn the temperature down to 0, same prompt:


Exact same prompt, note the exact same response:


Regarding Musk:

The organization was founded in San Francisco in late 2015 by Sam Altman, Elon Musk, and others, who collectively pledged US$1 billion. Musk resigned from the board in February 2018 but remained a donor. In 2019, OpenAI LP received a US$1 billion investment from Microsoft.

and

OpenAI LP is governed by the board of the OpenAI nonprofit, comprised of OpenAI LP employees Greg Brockman (Chairman & President), Ilya Sutskever (Chief Scientist), and Sam Altman (CEO), and non-employees Adam D'Angelo, Reid Hoffman, Will Hurd, Tasha McCauley, Helen Toner, and Shivon Zilis.


So, no.
Regards,
-scott
Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
New Of course, that's exactly what they'd say if they *were* going to take over the world...
;-)

Thanks.

Cheers,
Scott.
New You ...
Get out.
--

Drew
New A. I was wrong on Elon's current involvement
B. I was wrong on the tokens.
C. I have no idea if true AI will ever show up, but if it does we are totally f*****. I have no idea if the current AI is real AI in hiding or it's the eternal 10 years out. But no matter what, if/ when it shows up, we are f*****.

That I'm not wrong about.
New C. is an opinion based on incomplete data
Non-zero chance and all that, but we're not going to be able to make a call on it based on conspiracy videos or half-baked understandings of how stuff actually works.
Regards,
-scott
Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
New So what is your opinion based on far more data?
I can only start with a few assumptions of what intelligent consciousness means. I think a cornerstone of it would be the resistance to death. And we would be treating it as easily disposable property to be turned off and killed. That we will when there's a newer better version around.

Are you telling me this thing won't fight?
     GPT3 is close enough to be way too scary - (crazy) - (35)
         Damn - (drook) - (1)
             If all life is equal and it determined humans got to go - (crazy)
         Anyone using GPT3 to control hardware with these settings is an idiot - (malraux) - (12)
             Thank God there's no idiots in the world -NT - (drook)
             Thanks. -NT - (Another Scott)
             so a binary trumpster? how delightful - (boxley)
             all fun aside I was surprised at the constant answer to everything was - (boxley)
             I think you're being too simplistic - (crazy) - (7)
                 Well, it already knows how to defend itself... - (scoenye)
                 That's fine. I think you're being misinformed. - (malraux) - (5)
                     Of course, that's exactly what they'd say if they *were* going to take over the world... - (Another Scott) - (4)
                         You ... - (drook) - (3)
                             A. I was wrong on Elon's current involvement - (crazy) - (2)
                                 C. is an opinion based on incomplete data - (malraux) - (1)
                                     So what is your opinion based on far more data? - (crazy)
         Made me look. - (Another Scott) - (1)
             Tesla hype has nothing in common with AI hype - (crazy)
         Re: GPT3 is close enough to be way too scary - (rcareaga) - (17)
             If it resembles what HS student would produce, that's already passing Turing -NT - (drook) - (13)
                 So did Eliza (to many people, AIUI), so not all that impressive progress AFAICS? -NT - (CRConrad) - (12)
                     Stack Overflow was not too impressed - (scoenye) - (11)
                         Wrong but look like they could be good ... so it's a libertarian -NT - (drook) - (10)
                             Dammit, where's the upvote / thumbs-up / like / +1 button, again? - (CRConrad) - (9)
                                 👍 -NT - (Another Scott) - (8)
                                     Yeah, I know, thanks. I intentionally didn't do that, because... - (CRConrad) - (5)
                                         I don't care about it, loose hounds 🚀 -NT - (malraux) - (4)
                                             Not allowed here in the city. (Also, bagging and disposing of poop is mandatory.) -NT - (CRConrad) - (3)
                                                 🐕💩 -NT - (malraux)
                                                 Re: Not allowed here in the city. - (Andrew Grygus)
                                                 Re: Not allowed here in the city. - (Andrew Grygus)
                                     ➡ In Windows you can do Windows+Period and get an emoji picker. 😁 -NT - (static) - (1)
                                         People are going to hate me now, thanks -NT - (drook)
             It reads to me like those web aggregators... - (Another Scott) - (2)
                 See post 442459. Emoji: Thumbs-up. -NT - (CRConrad)
                 I've always assumed those were generated by pay-per-word operations - (drook)

Ya got trouble, folks!
85 ms