Yes, that

Post #436,650 by drook 10/13/20 9:41:31 AM 10/13/20 9:41:31 AM Reply	Yes, that Don't ask how she'll rule. All her to explain the impact of the rulings you assume she'd make. -- Drew
Post #436,651 by InThane 10/13/20 12:24:59 PM 10/13/20 12:24:59 PM Reply	Re: Yes, that She will respond "My responsibility is to make rulings that are in line with the constitution, and not to legislate from the bench." or some such nonsense and ignore the question.
Post #436,652 by drook 10/13/20 12:40:43 PM 10/13/20 12:40:43 PM Reply	[sigh] I know you're right My naive hope is that she could be a True Believer who is proud of her positions, or at least cares about how she's viewed by other True Believers. But then I remember that there are major religions that teach that it's no sin to lie to non-believers. -- Drew
Post #436,653 by InThane 10/13/20 2:13:39 PM 10/13/20 2:13:39 PM Reply	I just always assume my opponent will do the worst thing for me. That way when they fuck up I'm pleasantly surprised.
Post #436,656 by scoenye 10/13/20 5:07:08 PM 10/13/20 5:07:08 PM Reply	Raise the Federalist Society? That should put the lie to not legislating from the bench given the whole set of "corporations are people" decisions and other work to implement the Heritage Foundation's utopia.
Post #436,659 by Ashton 10/13/20 5:20:54 PM 10/13/20 5:20:54 PM Reply	Excellent! ..pity that zIWE isn't on most Pols' daily must-See-list: the fuels! [Insp. Clouseau OFF]

Welcome to IWETHEY!