But would that stop them from implementing it?

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #4,275 by Andrew Grygus 8/8/01 4:48:38 PM Reply	But would that stop them from implementing it? They still think they're going to be able to buy a fix on this whole anti-trust thing and get it swept under the carpet. These are people who haven't the slightest hint of respect for law or government - they just think they haven't found the right people to pay off yet. [link\|http://www.aaxnet.com\|AAx]
Post #4,280 by admin 8/8/01 4:54:32 PM Reply	Nope. But it's a few years away, and by then they will have been smacked down severely. District court injunctions are pretty quick to implement. I just don't think it's that doable on Microsoft's part. Regards, -scott anderson

Cringley on MS's possible plan..... - (addison) - (27) - Aug. 8, 2001, 03:44:10 PM EDT

It is indeed scary. - (Another Scott) - (4) - Aug. 8, 2001, 04:15:50 PM EDT

Nope. - (admin) - (2) - Aug. 8, 2001, 04:31:12 PM EDT

But would that stop them from implementing it? - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - Aug. 8, 2001, 04:48:38 PM EDT

Nope. - (admin) - Aug. 8, 2001, 04:54:32 PM EDT

Well, it might be self fixing. - (Andrew Grygus) - Aug. 8, 2001, 04:42:08 PM EDT

MS couldn't even write a decent TCP/IP stack. - (Brandioch) - (11) - Aug. 8, 2001, 05:15:19 PM EDT

Actually, I think he has a different point. - (static) - Aug. 8, 2001, 09:28:59 PM EDT

Re: MS couldn't even write a decent TCP/IP stack. - (acagle) - (8) - Aug. 15, 2001, 03:23:40 PM EDT

Re: MS couldn't even write a decent TCP/IP stack. - (tjsinclair) - (7) - Aug. 15, 2001, 06:23:14 PM EDT

Windows ME winsock.dll copyright says it's Microsoft's. - (a6l6e6x) - (6) - Aug. 15, 2001, 08:00:52 PM EDT

So why does it say BSD if it's Microsoft's? -NT - (tjsinclair) - (5) - Aug. 16, 2001, 12:10:05 AM EDT

API, not implementation - (kmself) - (4) - Aug. 16, 2001, 06:30:45 AM EDT

What he said! :) I agree. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Aug. 16, 2001, 02:33:54 PM EDT

Tried a google search - (wharris2) - (2) - Aug. 16, 2001, 04:59:52 PM EDT

ID number was a point. - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - Aug. 16, 2001, 11:32:43 PM EDT

Re: ID number was a point. - (wharris2) - Aug. 17, 2001, 12:35:16 AM EDT

the source they released for their original winsock 89? 90? - (boxley) - Aug. 17, 2001, 12:26:56 PM EDT

they tried this once before and almost lost the company - (boxley) - (9) - Aug. 8, 2001, 09:54:52 PM EDT

OT - RE; NetWare - (tjsinclair) - (8) - Aug. 8, 2001, 11:34:19 PM EDT

Killed? No . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (7) - Aug. 9, 2001, 12:52:11 AM EDT

So nothing's changed - (tjsinclair) - Aug. 9, 2001, 10:11:41 AM EDT

Actually... - (addison) - (5) - Aug. 9, 2001, 11:03:15 AM EDT

All the more reason . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (4) - Aug. 9, 2001, 11:53:39 AM EDT

Pure genius? - (wharris2) - (3) - Aug. 9, 2001, 12:01:11 PM EDT

It may seem stupid to technical person . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - Aug. 9, 2001, 12:16:43 PM EDT

You mean the DB2 ads, right? - (wharris2) - Aug. 9, 2001, 01:23:40 PM EDT

hey, I still have one of those OS/2 shirts.... -NT - (cforde) - Aug. 9, 2001, 01:02:43 PM EDT

Write that down!
151 ms