IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New He's a clown playing to the crowd.
I have two kids, too, Scott. I, like you, want the best for them. If we keep "holding our noses" and voting for evil, then it will take perhaps another generation or two for people to be finally fed up with the Great Worthless Thumb extracting everything of value from them and hoarding it all themselves. The trend is there. The polarization of wealth and the decline in the value of labor has been going apace since the late 1970's. Electing Clintons and Obamas is not going to do anything about that, other than, maybe - just maybe, slightly slow the rate. Is that good enough? I say it isn't. We're either serious about this and we nominate a Democratic Socialist or we nominate another Wall Street tool. It's like we're on this 10 mile road. At the end of that road, we don't know what happens. But he have to travel that road. We can choose "the lesser evil" and walk down that road at 1 mile per hour and take 10 hours to get there or we can get in a car by voting Trump and get there in 10 minutes.

Whatever lies beyond that road it's difficult to imagine that it can be much worse, but there will be pain first undoubtedly. The pain will be the same, whether in 10 minutes or 10 hours. Why not get through it as quickly as possible?
New I'm indifferent to mmoffitt's kids
Speaking out of rational self-interest, it makes a great deal of difference to me whether we get to the end of the road in ten metaphorical hours or in ten metaphorical minutes, because I do not want to be present for the explosion and flames that likely await us after the asphalt gives out.
Whatever lies beyond that road it's difficult to imagine that it can be much worse
Dennett or Dawkins, I forget which, once referred to that sort of thing as "the argument from incredulity." Difficult to imagine? You should exercise your imagination a little more, mmoffitt, 'cause I can come up with some plausibly nastier post-Trump scenarios without working up a sweat.

cordially,
New Nice edit.
I'm not claiming it will automagically be better immediately, as the part you cut I think clearly demonstrates. What could go wrong in the most armed populace in the world with the greatest polarization of wealth when the great unwashed have finally had enough? What emerges after that is not clear, but I've never be susceptible to a fear of change and imo this country needs fundamental change.
New After the euphoria of victory . . .
. . comes a massive power struggle, and execution of the idealistic revolutionaries. The new regime consolidates its power with an iron fist and proves to be pretty much the same as the old regime, except more repressive.

Read some history.
New Yep.
People like Mike are doomed to repeat it because they're blinded by their ideals. I don't want to accompany him in that handcart, though.
Regards,
-scott
Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
New handcart?
More like a tumbril, I'm thinking.

Welcome to the Place de la Révolution, M. Anderson.

cordially,
New Touché.
Regards,
-scott
Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
New Vote Trump 2016!
Here in Yoo Rop, us Yoor Peons could do with a laugh.

A really, really big laugh at the massive expense of millions of people.

ETA: That's Actual American Actual People, not mere notional furrin people.
Expand Edited by pwhysall Nov. 26, 2015, 06:53:46 AM EST
Expand Edited by pwhysall Nov. 26, 2015, 06:53:52 AM EST
New Pretty sure the consequences wouldn't neatly stay within our borders...
Regards,
-scott
Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
New Eh, we're doomed anyway.
Might as well die laughing.
New We fundamentally disagree that both roads lead to the same destination.
He's a clown, but he's a deadly serious clown.

The pain won't be the same. I don't agree that a gradual evolution is impossible. And if there's a choice between "definite bloodshed in 10 minutes" and "possible bloodshed in 10 hours", I'll take the latter every time. Anything else would be foolhardy.

You, nor anyone else, can predict what will happen. Don't take the most damaging route under the assumption that it will All Work Out.
Regards,
-scott
Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
New It's a slow death for many.
Median Household income in constant dollars.
2000: 57,724
2014: 53,657
Change: -4,067 / -7.5%

And how much did that "home" cost over the period:
Median Home Prices
Jan 2000: 163,500
Jan 2014: 269,800
Change: 106,300 / +65%

How about the cost of sending the kids to college?
Constant Dollars, per year expenditures at 4 year public institutions.
2001-2002 11,940
2012-2013 17,474
Change: 5,534 / +46% (so, with 7.5% less income, you need to come up with an additional 22K per child for a 4 year degree)

The current socio-economic system is failing for median households in this country. I refuse to believe that the best we can do is continue this long, slow death march and I do not believe there is any hope that things will ever improve if we continue electing the same kind of "lesser evils" that got us into this mess in the first place. What's that expression about doing the same things over and over and expecting/hoping for a different outcome?

On the bright side, if we elect Clinton, maybe median household incomes will only drop another 4% instead of 7.5% and they can be happy with that, right?

(Got numbers here: https://www.census.gov/construction/nrs/pdf/uspricemon.pdf and
here: https://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/MEHOINUSA672N and
https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=76 )
New Indeed.
Here's where you're going off the rails, though.

I do not believe there is any hope that things will ever improve if we continue electing the same kind of "lesser evils" that got us into this mess in the first place.


W was not the lesser evil. He was the greater evil that caused much of the mess we're in. Similarly with Reagan.

Letting the greater evil win makes things worse.

HTH.

Cheers,
Scott.
New And:
If El Trump is elected, what do you think will happen to these numbers?

Hint: there's a very good chance that a) there will be no Grand Revolution and b) the numbers will get even worse.

If there is a Grand Revolution, there's a good chance the numbers will get abysmal. If the Grand Revolution starts and fails, there could be no bottom.
Regards,
-scott
Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
     BooMan looks at the numbers and the implications for the GOP - (Another Scott) - (28)
         "At least as long as Hillary doesn't do anything stupid" burying Bernie a little early aren't you? -NT - (boxley) - (23)
             Bernie's not winning New Hampshire. - (Another Scott) - (22)
                 If you're right, then Trump gets an expected vote here. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (21)
                     on the other hand if the Canadian gets the nomination I will vote dem -NT - (boxley)
                     Your approach is idiotic. - (malraux) - (19)
                         disagree, trump is no more facist that the banker lady - (boxley) - (18)
                             Bs - (crazy)
                             I don't think so - (malraux) - (16)
                                 agree on the judges being important, what about single payer health care? thats important too - (boxley) - (15)
                                     At this point I'd settle for not getting in another damn war - (malraux) - (14)
                                         He's a clown playing to the crowd. - (mmoffitt) - (13)
                                             I'm indifferent to mmoffitt's kids - (rcareaga) - (8)
                                                 Nice edit. - (mmoffitt) - (4)
                                                     After the euphoria of victory . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (3)
                                                         Yep. - (malraux) - (2)
                                                             handcart? - (rcareaga) - (1)
                                                                 Touché. -NT - (malraux)
                                                 Vote Trump 2016! - (pwhysall) - (2)
                                                     Pretty sure the consequences wouldn't neatly stay within our borders... -NT - (malraux) - (1)
                                                         Eh, we're doomed anyway. - (pwhysall)
                                             We fundamentally disagree that both roads lead to the same destination. - (malraux) - (3)
                                                 It's a slow death for many. - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                                                     Indeed. - (Another Scott)
                                                     And: - (malraux)
         Kasich campaign attack ad - (rcareaga) - (3)
             Good words, but I wouldn't take it to be a sign of Kasich's character. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                 Speaking as an Ohioan, Kasich hasn't done Ohio any favors. - (hnick) - (1)
                     The enemy of my enemy can still be my enemy -NT - (rcareaga)

This one is just screaming out for some deep massaging in Perl.
124 ms