#1. It has been established that Mike does NOT provide support for his "facts".
#2. I am not going to waste my time digging through EVERYTHING ever written or said by Finkelhor to prove that he DID NOT say what Mike claims he said (without providing references). I'm sure everyone else here understands the futility of attempting to prove a negative.
#3. I'm not even going to discuss/debate with someone who hasn't advanced to the point of being able to tell "okay" from "legal".
#4. Not to mention the futility of discussion/debate with someone who doesn't understand the difference between "fact" and "opinion".
#5. Yes, I do believe that Mike lies. Why discuss/debate with someone who lies?
Like I said before, I'm out of this until he can prove to me that he's advanced enough to tell "okay" from "legal". I've provided him with the classic text-book example of slavery. There's really nothing more that can be done at this point.