...but a total fucking idiot.
You don't understand logic, rules of debate, or just about fucking *anything*.
If everything were so fucking cut and dried as you try to make out ("OJ was found not guilty because the jury felt that the defense had raised
sufficient reasonable doubt ... The schoolmistress admitted that the events occurred. What was needed was for someone to judge whether the actions constitued indecent assault. They felt that it didn't" -- i.e, in essence, "some random collection of fuckwits didn't THINK it was ILLEGAL, so that means it WAS actually RIGHT"), then why the fuck would anybody ever discuss anything, here or anywhere else, in the first place?
Oh, couldn't be because there's a DIFFERENCE between what some people *think* is *illegal* and what *is* actually *right*, could it? And that the latter can be discussed, on its own merits, *regardless* of the former? Naah...
"Ba da bing", in-fucking-deed. You're the biggest fucking nitwit I've seen here since Le Moron left for good, I think.
Are you *sure* you aren't Danny Ross?