Why do you keep bringing up legal?He doesn't; it's YOU who've introduced that time after time when he asked you if it was "Okay".
And since David Finkelhor obviously didn't say, in the piece you cited -- and that's what counts here, not what you *claim* "is available" in some library or somewhere -- what you apparently thought (judging from the fact that at first you claimed *that* was where he said it) he said, mr Reading Comprehension, I wouldn't try to paint Brandioch with the "ignorance" brush if I were you.
So, Lying: Yes, Brandi is right, Mike did/does lie;
Ignorance: No, Mike is wrong, it isn't Brandioch who's ignorant here.
Bravo, Mikey, you're two for two! Wanna try for three out of three?