So far you have proved ignorance of.....
norms in other countries
sociology
international law
.....
and now criminal and civil law.
OJ was found not guilty because the jury felt that the defense had raised
sufficient reasonable doubt. Whether it was sufficient...is their call and not
yours. Don't like the system.......campaign for something else.
If you do some research you will be able to figure out why he was found liable
in civil court (hint: burden of proof is not the same its "on a balance of probabilities").
The questions of the facts of the case in England are not in doubt by ANYONE. The schoolmistress admitted that the events occurred. What was needed was for someone to judge whether the actions constitued indecent assault. They felt that it didn't. Ba da bing.