From one of your earlier posts
But it >IS< about adult/child sex, right?
Then you thrash away on a scenario between a 16 year old and 30 year old male.
Hey ....YOU picked it. I tried to address it. Your scenario is LEGAL in many
places. The societies that made these rules said to themselves....."know what we are not going to criminalise sex between males when it occurs at age 16 or higher." It doesn't mean that they think its a wonderful idea. It doesn't mean they even condone it....what they ARE saying is that at 16 a person is able to make their own decisions and give consent. They may make mistakes.....but we won't put people in jail as result of the mistakes they make.
You picked a really shit scenario.....your fault not mine. I'm not going to argue your side of the debate for you. [Though God knows you need some help].
Now you want to point out that there is little connection between your scenario
and my original assertion in my first post?
>>Which will seem rather odd when you compare that to your first post about how >>you would be fine with sex with an older woman when you were under the age of >>consent.
You intentionally drove the thread away from MY scenario and now you want to
finger me as the person who got you there????????? You are a solid gold 24 carat
sweetheart ya know? Fucking priceless.
>>Suffice to say that you made numerous comments in your original post and have >>evaded attempts to clarify your position.
Dude, I've jumped through friggin' hoops for ya like a circus poodle.
>>#1. WHEN is it "okay" (do NOT tell me when it is "legal") for a child to have >>sex with an adult.
>>#2. Answer #1 without using "legal".
Answer: It is never "okay" for a child to have sex with an adult.
When I was 15 I wasn't a child anymore. I assure you......I was not a child at 15. Tell me I was a child without using the word "legal".
>>You supplied links to two articles discussing the SAME BOOK.
Oh golly gosh...that means they cancel each other out right?
Well, its a very recent publication and its generated a lot of debate and controversy.
>>If the debate was very active on said subject, I would expect to see more >>books, publications, whatever.
From the USA Today article "The controversy is engaging some researchers at top universities". I don't know what to tell you. I recommend you swing by the sociology section in your public library. It aint all on the web dude.
>>You have an opinion that we're to[o] uptight about sex
Oh God yeah that much is in NO doubt
>>yet you're so uptight that you get bent out of shape when you see the words "adult...child...fucking"
Oh no not at at all...I just think its a puerile source of tittilation for you
and I think you get a boner every time you write it.
>>Yes. And that is an "opinion". It is also unsupportable. Therefore, it is >>useless.
Fucking eh......you're just batting a thousand tonight.
Unsupportable...really?
Lets do this, let's E-Mail 10 male friends and tell them they are fifteen years old. They are about to have sex with Miss America ...when she is 16, 17, 18, 19,
20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25...etc.
Lets see how high they let the age go before they would say....."no stop....
I think that might have traumatized me. Twenty four is way too old".
Are 10 opinions worth anything? How about 1000 opinions? When does the "that's just you....and your opinion" cop out get shown up to be the bullshit that it is?