I have told you what *I* think would have been the outcome for me.Yes. And that is an "opinion". It is also unsupportable. Therefore, it is useless.
I have supplied links to two separate and current articles which indicate that debate is very active on those topics.You supplied links to two articles discussing the SAME BOOK. Said book has 4 pages devoted to inter-generational sex.
If the debate was very active on said subject, I would expect to see more books, publications, whatever.
After all, that >IS< how these academic debates are carried out.
This is moronic debate. My beliefs are my beliefs. I poured scorn on the fact that I might have been traumatized. You say...."oh but you don't know that....".Your original post:
Sorry dude....you can take it to the friggin' bank.
[link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=37289|Has the world gone crazy?]
Once again the state tells us whats good for us. Is this on the edge or what? The idea that I could have been abused at the age of 15 by a sexy school mistress is just absurd.So, you claimed that >YOU< would be "okay" with it.
Given that, I attempted to discover what your criteria for adult/child fucking would be.
And it has taken me this long to get you to comment on ONE specific instance (16/30 male/male).
Has anybody ever heard of young men being "traumatized" as a result of having consensual sex with an older woman?And I believe that some material was referenced for this.
Suffice to say that you made numerous comments in your original post and have evaded attempts to clarify your position.
#1. WHEN is it "okay" (do NOT tell me when it is "legal") for a child to have sex with an adult.
#2. Answer #1 without using "legal".
Criteria. You have an opinion that we're to uptight about sex, yet you're so uptight that you get bent out of shape when you see the words "adult...child...fucking".
What the fuck am I even trying for? I already KNOW what your response will be. It will boil down to "It's okay as long as it is between consenting individuals of the age of consent".
Which will seem rather odd when you compare that to your first post about how you would be fine with sex with an older woman when you were under the age of consent.
From the specific case to the general rule. But you're failing to make that progression. You still see the world as "everyone else" and "Mike".
Deal with it.