What is it.......have I or have I not said that it was okay?No, you have not.
And, despite a rather lengthy post, you STILL have not said if it was "okay".
You seem obsessed with the "legal" aspect.
So I didn't use the word okay. Hmmm didn't realise that THAT specific word was going to become the fulcrum.I could make a comment about "reading with comprehension" here.
It isn't like this is the ONLY time I've asked you to specify if it was "okay" rather than "legal" in some other country.
Hey...I have an idea.......why don't you offer a definition of "okay" that way I can better decide if think it is "okay" according to the Brandioch meaning of the word.And, again, you are attempting to avoid saying it is "okay" or "not okay".
If you don't see any difference between "legal" and "okay", then the solution is simple.
Just post "I think that sex between a 16 year old boy and a 30 year old man is okay."
There. Do that.
:)
...if "okay" means "acceptable" then its okay (with the proviso that no laws are broken)Well, that's a start. But I do notice that you decided to skip over my related question.
How about the following:
16 & 30 is "okay" with you.
15 & 29?
14 & 28?
13 & 27?
12 & 26?
Now let me ask you this...... in your scenario ... is the law relevant or not?Hmmm, since you seem to have already found www.ageofconsent.com, then you should be aware that the LAW varies SIGNIFICANTLY betwen countries/states.
So, if I were concerned with what was LEGAL, I would visit that site.
If I were concerned with what was LEGAL, I, probably, would NOT have made the distinction between "okay" and "legal" so many times in my previous posts.
But, since some people are somewhat slow.......
No, I am NOT concerned with what is LEGAL.