Unix at its worst
- (Arkadiy)
- (21)
- Aug. 1, 2001, 12:16:14 PM EDT
Oh, good idea!
-NT
- (jlalexander)
- Aug. 1, 2001, 12:26:38 PM EDT
That freakin' rocks!
- (Yendor)
- Aug. 1, 2001, 02:07:32 PM EDT
Why not simply create a background process
- (Simon_Jester)
- (1)
- Aug. 2, 2001, 12:27:32 AM EDT
Good Admin = Lack of Hacks
- (deSitter)
- Aug. 3, 2001, 01:06:04 PM EDT
A crutch
- (kmself)
- (2)
- Aug. 2, 2001, 10:18:07 PM EDT
100% Correct
- (deSitter)
- (1)
- Aug. 3, 2001, 12:59:39 PM EDT
- - (dash dash)
- (kmself)
- Aug. 4, 2001, 05:30:55 PM EDT
Sounds unnecessarily complicated.
- (pwhysall)
- (12)
- Aug. 3, 2001, 02:48:54 AM EDT
Better, But Also Bad
- (deSitter)
- (11)
- Aug. 3, 2001, 01:02:00 PM EDT
Agree
- (pwhysall)
- Aug. 4, 2001, 02:12:37 AM EDT
Just thinkin...
- (pwhysall)
- (9)
- Aug. 4, 2001, 04:33:45 AM EDT
Triumph of the practical over the Pure?
- (Ashton)
- (8)
- Aug. 4, 2001, 03:58:37 PM EDT
That extra [Y] - unacceptable.
- (Andrew Grygus)
- (7)
- Aug. 4, 2001, 08:42:22 PM EDT
Re: That extra [Y] - unacceptable.
- (cforde)
- (1)
- Aug. 5, 2001, 01:28:58 AM EDT
OK disable w/scripts natch. But: 'self-destruct CR'?____:[
-NT
- (Ashton)
- Aug. 5, 2001, 03:44:07 AM EDT
Not really.
- (pwhysall)
- (4)
- Aug. 5, 2001, 05:39:18 AM EDT
Personally.. prefer: wombat foo. Nice ring to it -
-NT
- (Ashton)
- (3)
- Aug. 5, 2001, 03:32:23 PM EDT
Re: Personally..., I prefer: foo man choo. :)
-NT
- (a6l6e6x)
- (2)
- Aug. 5, 2001, 03:40:30 PM EDT
LRPD settles All!
- (Ashton)
- Aug. 5, 2001, 04:21:16 PM EDT
Hey! That's my other alternate personality!
- (tseliot)
- Aug. 6, 2001, 02:03:57 PM EDT
much better way
- (boxley)
- Aug. 4, 2001, 07:25:21 PM EDT
