thats why lottery, no money involved

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 2 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #332,099

by boxley

8/31/10 3:02:52 PM

thats why lottery, no money involved

create a new class of propertied people, many of which would sell them immediately. Frenzy bad prices but all of it in private hands again in at most 2 years.

Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 55 years. meep

Felix: Fix the economy by increasing immigration. - (Another Scott) - (76) - Aug. 31, 2010, 07:52:05 AM EDT

how else are you going to fix social security - (boxley) - Aug. 31, 2010, 08:07:28 AM EDT

Think they may have causation a bit wrong - (beepster) - (74) - Aug. 31, 2010, 10:25:07 AM EDT

The biggest problem now is the housing bubble. - (Another Scott) - (73) - Aug. 31, 2010, 11:08:22 AM EDT

increased demand for housing? - (boxley) - (7) - Aug. 31, 2010, 11:31:48 AM EDT

You know what I mean... - (Another Scott) - (6) - Aug. 31, 2010, 11:46:13 AM EDT

take the inventory of fannie and freddie - (boxley) - (5) - Aug. 31, 2010, 01:28:00 PM EDT

Depends on how it's done. - (Another Scott) - (4) - Aug. 31, 2010, 01:47:24 PM EDT

Re: Depends on how it's done. - (SpiceWare) - (2) - Aug. 31, 2010, 02:22:20 PM EDT

Interesting. Thanks. -NT - (Another Scott) - Aug. 31, 2010, 02:36:18 PM EDT

"As we've gone through the lessons that we've learned ..." - (drook) - Aug. 31, 2010, 03:46:02 PM EDT

thats why lottery, no money involved - (boxley) - Aug. 31, 2010, 03:02:52 PM EDT

I'm finding this very funny... - (beepster) - (64) - Aug. 31, 2010, 02:35:42 PM EDT

And just in case that is too rosy a forecast - (beepster) - (55) - Aug. 31, 2010, 02:43:08 PM EDT

Why would a business invest if there's no demand? - (Another Scott) - (4) - Sept. 1, 2010, 08:01:00 AM EDT

true statement - (boxley) - Sept. 1, 2010, 08:13:28 AM EDT

You're getting there - (beepster) - (2) - Sept. 1, 2010, 10:35:39 AM EDT

Eh? - (Another Scott) - (1) - Sept. 1, 2010, 11:08:08 AM EDT

Krugman is wrong :-) - (beepster) - Sept. 1, 2010, 11:11:33 AM EDT

Companies are not "industry" - (drook) - (49) - Sept. 1, 2010, 09:42:01 AM EDT

Seriously? - (beepster) - (48) - Sept. 1, 2010, 10:42:25 AM EDT

Where you stand ... where you sit ... - (drook) - (47) - Sept. 1, 2010, 11:55:56 AM EDT

Not at all the same. They're only tangent linked - (beepster) - (46) - Sept. 1, 2010, 01:23:25 PM EDT

I did - (drook) - (45) - Sept. 1, 2010, 02:08:06 PM EDT

Different causation - (beepster) - (44) - Sept. 2, 2010, 02:01:42 AM EDT

You seem to be making a Supply Side argument. - (Another Scott) - (43) - Sept. 2, 2010, 07:55:29 AM EDT

Who is the customer? - (beepster) - (42) - Sept. 2, 2010, 09:30:33 AM EDT

What does that mean? - (drook) - (41) - Sept. 2, 2010, 09:39:12 AM EDT

dunno if you noticed, it aint the poor getting the checks - (boxley) - Sept. 2, 2010, 09:44:38 AM EDT

sigh - (beepster) - (39) - Sept. 2, 2010, 01:41:09 PM EDT

Why should I care about intra-industrial demand? - (drook) - (38) - Sept. 2, 2010, 04:04:00 PM EDT

Oh, and by the way ... - (drook) - (8) - Sept. 3, 2010, 07:59:39 AM EDT

Software? - (beepster) - (7) - Sept. 3, 2010, 12:57:48 PM EDT

Of course, focus on the *least important* part of that quote -NT - (drook) - (6) - Sept. 3, 2010, 01:26:43 PM EDT

What, - (beepster) - (5) - Sept. 3, 2010, 02:44:08 PM EDT

"Recovery means jobs" - (drook) - (4) - Sept. 3, 2010, 04:59:02 PM EDT

Re: "Recovery means jobs" - (boxley) - (3) - Sept. 3, 2010, 05:14:43 PM EDT

That was Bill's line - (drook) - (2) - Sept. 3, 2010, 08:44:02 PM EDT

bill is right - (boxley) - Sept. 3, 2010, 09:17:04 PM EDT

With a line like that... - (beepster) - Sept. 3, 2010, 09:24:30 PM EDT

You want jobs, correct? - (beepster) - (28) - Sept. 3, 2010, 12:55:34 PM EDT

That's not a point, that's an article - (drook) - (27) - Sept. 3, 2010, 01:41:53 PM EDT

Get this through your head. - (beepster) - (26) - Sept. 4, 2010, 02:43:16 AM EDT

Quit with the shorthand - (drook) - (25) - Sept. 4, 2010, 10:54:30 AM EDT

Re: Quit with the shorthand - (beepster) - (24) - Sept. 4, 2010, 05:24:49 PM EDT

So you completely disagree with the "two economies" premise? - (drook) - (6) - Sept. 4, 2010, 08:22:46 PM EDT

Absolutely - (beepster) - (5) - Sept. 5, 2010, 12:15:57 AM EDT

You're half right - (drook) - (4) - Sept. 5, 2010, 08:45:07 AM EDT

No, its not. - (beepster) - (3) - Sept. 5, 2010, 12:22:08 PM EDT

You're kidding, right? - (drook) - (2) - Sept. 5, 2010, 12:30:17 PM EDT

welfare food stamps unemployment compensation - (boxley) - (1) - Sept. 5, 2010, 06:26:44 PM EDT

Eh? - (Another Scott) - Sept. 8, 2010, 01:37:22 AM EDT

Big D. - (Another Scott) - (16) - Sept. 6, 2010, 08:39:56 AM EDT

To be honest - (beepster) - Sept. 6, 2010, 08:19:01 PM EDT

cheese - (boxley) - (14) - Sept. 6, 2010, 08:57:35 PM EDT

Talk to Sorros about that. - (Another Scott) - (13) - Sept. 7, 2010, 01:58:39 AM EDT

Central Banks >are< the market. -NT - (beepster) - (12) - Sept. 7, 2010, 08:42:49 AM EDT

<Boggle> I guess that's how George never made his $1B... - (Another Scott) - (11) - Sept. 7, 2010, 10:32:10 AM EDT

piggybacking a market isnt brilliant - (boxley) - Sept. 7, 2010, 11:00:46 AM EDT

He made it playing the market.. - (beepster) - (9) - Sept. 7, 2010, 03:24:22 PM EDT

And...? - (Another Scott) - (8) - Sept. 7, 2010, 03:34:29 PM EDT

Would he have made that money without central banks? - (beepster) - (7) - Sept. 7, 2010, 04:17:16 PM EDT

You're not getting it. - (Another Scott) - (6) - Sept. 8, 2010, 03:47:00 AM EDT

how very conservative of you :-) - (boxley) - (3) - Sept. 8, 2010, 08:38:26 AM EDT

This has nothing to do with the "Fair Tax". - (Another Scott) - (2) - Sept. 8, 2010, 10:02:29 AM EDT

from October 12, 2009 - (boxley) - (1) - Sept. 8, 2010, 10:38:49 AM EDT

Interesting. Thanks. (The rest of it is bogus, of course.;-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Sept. 8, 2010, 10:53:09 AM EDT

Oh, I am - (beepster) - (1) - Sept. 8, 2010, 09:33:24 AM EDT

Hmmm. - (Another Scott) - Sept. 8, 2010, 10:59:53 AM EDT

It's the same most places in First World countries. - (static) - (7) - Aug. 31, 2010, 07:42:50 PM EDT

This "free trade" mantra is a relatively new development. - (Another Scott) - (6) - Aug. 31, 2010, 10:22:06 PM EDT

The kos artlcle - (beepster) - (3) - Aug. 31, 2010, 11:33:48 PM EDT

I guess you missed the rending of garments about the tires.. - (Another Scott) - (2) - Sept. 1, 2010, 07:24:29 AM EDT

tires - (boxley) - Sept. 1, 2010, 08:18:14 AM EDT

No, I didn't - (beepster) - Sept. 1, 2010, 10:05:45 AM EDT

Not sure if you are advocating the article - (boxley) - (1) - Sept. 1, 2010, 08:20:25 AM EDT

He's saying that argument is wrong. - (Another Scott) - Sept. 1, 2010, 09:51:05 AM EDT

iwethey.org

Ahead two thirds!
129 ms