Agreed

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #31,477 by ben_tilly 3/9/02 12:16:22 PM Reply	Agreed I have an established online identity under my real name. Had I to do it over again, I would use an anonymous pseudoname. But doing that would involve my dropping my existing one, friends, and so on. It isn't worth it to me at this point. Cheers, Ben PS My mother did find out about my online identity not long ago. She was at least somewhat pleased by it. :-) "... I couldn't see how anyone could be educated by this self-propagating system in which people pass exams, teach others to pass exams, but nobody knows anything." --Richard Feynman
Post #31,494 by slugbug 3/9/02 3:47:10 PM Reply	ditto... ....happy to be known by the moniker often used in car games. something to be said for anonymity.... -slugbug
Post #31,503 by broomberg 3/9/02 4:42:04 PM Reply	Sorry Won't work for you if someone really wanted to delve. You are too well known, and I've seen people use your name in response to things you've written.
Post #31,505 by slugbug 3/9/02 5:00:16 PM Reply	Hmmmm..... ....good responses or bad responses? ;-) Maybe I should change my handle?
Post #31,509 by ben_tilly 3/9/02 6:47:05 PM Reply	I think it isn't a problem I just did a search with a real name. Found a ton of obvious stuff that wouldn't be a problem on a resume. I just put in a real name plus the moniker. Found no links on Google. From which I conclude that continued posting with "slugbug" won't show up if anyone is checking references. Cheers, Ben "... I couldn't see how anyone could be educated by this self-propagating system in which people pass exams, teach others to pass exams, but nobody knows anything." --Richard Feynman
Post #31,520 by slugbug 3/9/02 10:03:30 PM Reply	yup.... tried the same thing a bit earlier and reached the same conclusion....slugger it will be then :) thanks!

Are employers discriminating against IWETHEY members? - (nking) - (50) - March 8, 2002, 05:30:33 PM EST

I highly....highly...doubt that. -NT - (bepatient) - March 8, 2002, 05:49:34 PM EST

doubtful - (SpiceWare) - (48) - March 8, 2002, 05:54:20 PM EST

All I am saying - (nking) - (47) - March 8, 2002, 06:04:35 PM EST

You're reaching... -NT - (bepatient) - March 8, 2002, 06:06:11 PM EST

While unlikely, possible - (broomberg) - (27) - March 8, 2002, 07:52:21 PM EST

What he said - (kmself) - (10) - March 8, 2002, 10:13:03 PM EST

"your Mom, ...", your grandkids, your neighbor's grandkids, - (Another Scott) - (9) - March 8, 2002, 11:04:07 PM EST

What??? - (bepatient) - March 9, 2002, 12:31:15 AM EST

There goes any chance for - (Ashton) - March 9, 2002, 01:08:06 AM EST

Oh. Rats. - (static) - March 9, 2002, 03:57:58 AM EST

Agreed - (ben_tilly) - (5) - March 9, 2002, 12:16:22 PM EST

ditto... - (slugbug) - (4) - March 9, 2002, 03:47:10 PM EST

Sorry - (broomberg) - (3) - March 9, 2002, 04:42:04 PM EST

Hmmmm..... - (slugbug) - March 9, 2002, 05:00:16 PM EST

I think it isn't a problem - (ben_tilly) - (1) - March 9, 2002, 06:47:05 PM EST

yup.... - (slugbug) - March 9, 2002, 10:03:30 PM EST

Signs of insanity - (nking) - (15) - March 9, 2002, 11:41:29 AM EST

not! - (slugbug) - March 9, 2002, 03:54:05 PM EST

Doesn't matter - (broomberg) - (13) - March 9, 2002, 04:40:07 PM EST

So basically I'm screwed - (nking) - (11) - March 9, 2002, 06:06:27 PM EST

Only if... - (bepatient) - (8) - March 9, 2002, 06:15:50 PM EST

I am not neglecting my condition - (nking) - (7) - March 10, 2002, 12:56:21 AM EST

Historical context - (bepatient) - (3) - March 10, 2002, 10:13:57 AM EST

Historical out of context - (nking) - (2) - March 10, 2002, 07:35:13 PM EST

Never mind. -NT - (bepatient) - March 10, 2002, 08:00:37 PM EST

"Looking back ..." - *Don't* look back so much. Move ahead. - (Another Scott) - March 10, 2002, 09:51:43 PM EST

Have you started an exercise program yet? - (ben_tilly) - (2) - March 11, 2002, 10:04:28 AM EST

yes I have, been walking - (nking) - (1) - March 11, 2002, 01:30:03 PM EST

Sounds good - (ben_tilly) - March 11, 2002, 02:12:53 PM EST

No, but you need to take steps - (broomberg) - (1) - March 9, 2002, 09:01:36 PM EST

I suppose I'm fairly lucky... - (bepatient) - March 9, 2002, 09:57:09 PM EST

*blush* - (ben_tilly) - March 9, 2002, 07:46:34 PM EST

Really doubt it - (bconnors) - (17) - March 10, 2002, 11:27:51 PM EST

via mailing list -NT - (Silverlock) - (16) - March 11, 2002, 09:04:57 AM EST

I'm working on it - (bconnors) - (15) - March 11, 2002, 05:21:45 PM EST

You could ask Google to remove your pages. - (Another Scott) - (9) - March 11, 2002, 05:30:44 PM EST

The Evil Twin Syndrome - (nking) - (1) - March 11, 2002, 08:57:16 PM EST

Well, I can't remember the ethnicity right off, - (mhuber) - March 11, 2002, 11:59:06 PM EST

Will Google remove the pages for a specific person? - (bconnors) - (6) - March 13, 2002, 12:02:19 PM EST

Best thing you can do - (orion) - (5) - March 13, 2002, 12:12:47 PM EST

Done - (bconnors) - (4) - March 13, 2002, 12:37:41 PM EST

Damn - previously logged in as... (nomsg) -NT - (Missing User 286) - (3) - March 13, 2002, 12:39:45 PM EST

Good name, - (orion) - March 13, 2002, 01:46:54 PM EST

What a juxtaposition... - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - March 13, 2002, 01:48:04 PM EST

Attention K-Mart shoppers! - (orion) - March 13, 2002, 02:58:57 PM EST

So change your nick now - (Silverlock) - (4) - March 11, 2002, 11:48:21 PM EST

Would anyone care if I changed mine? - (nking) - (3) - March 12, 2002, 10:15:10 AM EST

What's it matter whether we like it or not? - (Silverlock) - March 12, 2002, 10:43:27 AM EST

Go for it, orion. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - March 12, 2002, 10:56:40 AM EST

Your wish is my command. :) - (orion) - March 12, 2002, 01:30:10 PM EST

You will be boiled in vegetable oil and packaged for housecats.
441 ms