IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New She was asked to come.
The contempt is thus one of a civil order.

If the Democrats want this to be a showdown they need to level CRIMINAL charges against the players and have a grand jury placed.

The way they are doing it now won't ever be resolved.

And I've a feeling they don't really want it resolved...given the likelihood that they will control the exec branch in 18 months.

My read is most here think that the abuse is somehow limited to this administration...this slippery slope has been in place for more than 30 years...

But Hillary will make it better, won't she.
[image|/forums/images/warning.png|0|This is sarcasm...]
Too much of today's music is fashionable crap dressed as artistry.Adrian Belew
New While I don't disagree on
whether or not Democrats really want this done or not (and I note that every Republican voted AGAINST the charge)...

I thought regardless of whether crimainal or civil charges are filed, that the charges had to come from the House as a whole rather than just a sub-committee. But I could be wrong.

[on edit]
Isn't asked to come incorrect? Wasn't she subpoenaed? (You mean you don't have to show if you're subpoenaed?)
Expand Edited by Simon_Jester July 27, 2007, 12:12:18 AM EDT
     Bush claims Congress can not challenge executive privilege - (JayMehaffey) - (25)
         Impeachment needs to go back on the table. -NT - (Silverlock) - (17)
             All that is needed - (bepatient) - (16)
                 All that is needed? Guillotines would be a start - (rcareaga) - (14)
                     It needs to be put to due process. - (bepatient) - (13)
                         That would be a step in the right direction - (JayMehaffey)
                         I'm not sure the Democrats want that anymore though.... - (Simon_Jester) - (3)
                             You mean to tell me... - (bepatient) - (2)
                                 chuckle... - (Simon_Jester) - (1)
                                     Re: chuckle... - (bepatient)
                         The don't need 60%? - (Silverlock) - (7)
                             They don't - (bepatient) - (6)
                                 Remember the point Bill - (Silverlock) - (5)
                                     Re: Remember the point Bill - (bepatient) - (4)
                                         ??? - (Simon_Jester) - (3)
                                             Jury-nullification of the Constitution, then? - (Ashton)
                                             She was asked to come. - (bepatient) - (1)
                                                 While I don't disagree on - (Simon_Jester)
                 Actually I agree. - (Simon_Jester)
         Glenn Greenwald parses the imponderables, pretty well - (Ashton) - (6)
             starting to think that a gathering at the gates of smiling - (boxley) - (3)
                 You already gibber daily. - (pwhysall) - (2)
                     :-)s___at the cut of yout giblet -NT - (Ashton)
                     societal gibberin, to gibber en mass like sitin -NT - (boxley)
             Isn't it interesting that... - (jb4) - (1)
                 Maybe even three delicious. -NT - (CRConrad)

  1. I've heard it before; and
  2. I didn't care the first time.

125 ms