IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Open Forum / Perhaps, more examples of naivity?
Post #287,191
by warmachine
6/18/07 5:35:42 AM
Reply
New Perhaps, more examples of naivity?
Occasionally, people do mistakingly fail to engage their brain before opening their mouth or typing, which they realise is stupid afterwards. This could be such an occasion. Unless you have previous examples of naivity in mind.
Matthew Greet


Choose Life. Choose a job. Choose a career. Choose a family. Choose a fucking big television, choose washing machines, cars, compact disc players and electrical tin openers. Choose good health, low cholesterol, and dental insurance. Choose fixed interest mortgage repayments. Choose a starter home. Choose your friends. Choose leisurewear and matching luggage. Choose DIY and wondering who the fuck you are on a Sunday morning. Choose sitting on that couch watching mind-numbing, spirit-crushing game shows, stuffing fucking junk food into your mouth. Choose rotting away at the end of it all, pishing your last in a miserable home, nothing more than an embarrassment to the selfish, fucked up brats you spawned to replace yourself. Choose your future. Choose life... But why would I want to do a thing like that? I chose not to choose life. I chose somethin' else. And the reasons? There are no reasons. Who needs reasons when you've got heroin?
- Mark Renton, Trainspotting.
Post #287,197
by CRConrad
6/18/07 7:46:40 AM
Reply
New Lots of 'em-they're the very ones I want him to (re)consider
     Seriously, Bryce, I'm not saying this to be mean, but... - (CRConrad) - (34) - June 17, 2007, 08:13:32 PM EDT
         You mean the "payroll" example? Not very specific - (tablizer) - (31) - June 18, 2007, 01:01:29 AM EDT
             What are you on about? No, absolutely not "Payroll example"! - (CRConrad) - (1) - June 18, 2007, 04:55:28 AM EDT
                 Okay, I see it now - (tablizer) - June 18, 2007, 11:20:34 AM EDT
             Wow, deja vu (hypothetically) - (drewk) - (28) - June 18, 2007, 07:40:32 PM EDT
                 Which one? - (tablizer) - (27) - June 18, 2007, 08:10:39 PM EDT
                     Neither - (drewk) - (26) - June 18, 2007, 09:45:52 PM EDT
                         Thank you, that was very helpful - (tablizer) - (25) - June 19, 2007, 04:20:37 PM EDT
                             No, thank *you* - (drewk) - June 19, 2007, 07:03:55 PM EDT
                             Burden Of Proof - (pwhysall) - (23) - June 20, 2007, 01:12:48 AM EDT
                                 thats easy c++ :-) -NT - (boxley) - (19) - June 20, 2007, 07:37:40 AM EDT
                                     idontnowatumeenbox.c++isorlrite - (pwhysall) - June 20, 2007, 07:48:50 AM EDT
                                     C is a crippled language because it is a crippled language - (tablizer) - (17) - June 20, 2007, 11:35:54 AM EDT
                                         I have always considered C to be . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (15) - June 20, 2007, 02:58:56 PM EDT
                                             I disagree. - (admin) - (1) - June 20, 2007, 03:16:51 PM EDT
                                                 ICLPRD (new thread) - (static) - June 21, 2007, 12:28:09 AM EDT
                                             Nah, Pascal was a teaching language - (hnick) - (5) - June 20, 2007, 05:54:38 PM EDT
                                                 According to Nicholas Wirth he did not . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (4) - June 20, 2007, 07:38:43 PM EDT
                                                     So who are you going to believe? - (hnick) - (2) - June 21, 2007, 07:26:29 AM EDT
                                                         Nah, you probably won't: "Argument". HTH! :-) -NT - (CRConrad) - June 21, 2007, 09:53:50 AM EDT
                                                         Early versions had only 16-bit integers . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - June 21, 2007, 10:59:41 AM EDT
                                                     Maybe not originally, but when he wrote Modula II - (jb4) - June 21, 2007, 11:32:50 PM EDT
                                             I gotta say that... - (jb4) - (6) - June 21, 2007, 11:28:47 PM EDT
                                                 It's that stupid single exit point from a function - (crazy) - (5) - June 21, 2007, 11:35:13 PM EDT
                                                     I've got NO PROBLEM with that - (jb4) - (4) - June 24, 2007, 10:21:48 PM EDT
                                                         You ever have nested while and for loops? - (crazy) - (3) - June 24, 2007, 11:34:38 PM EDT
                                                             "Numereous flags" - (jb4) - (1) - June 27, 2007, 09:21:29 PM EDT
                                                                 Didn't think so? - (crazy) - June 27, 2007, 09:46:24 PM EDT
                                                             That's a good way out. - (static) - June 29, 2007, 06:00:12 PM EDT
                                         It is not the pinochle of procedural by a longshot, either. -NT - (jb4) - June 21, 2007, 11:26:07 PM EDT
                                 All these years and you still misunderstand my opinion - (tablizer) - (2) - June 20, 2007, 11:34:27 AM EDT
                                     Not misunderstand ... DISAGREE -NT - (drewk) - (1) - June 20, 2007, 07:53:14 PM EDT
                                         If something is objectively better, then you should show why -NT - (tablizer) - June 21, 2007, 11:20:59 AM EDT
         Perhaps, more examples of naivity? - (warmachine) - (1) - June 18, 2007, 05:35:42 AM EDT
             Lots of 'em-they're the very ones I want him to (re)consider -NT - (CRConrad) - June 18, 2007, 07:46:40 AM EDT

Jane! Jane, get me off this crazy thing!
60 ms