Didn't think so?

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #287,982

6/27/07 9:46:24 PM

Didn't think so?

Hah.

Wimp.

[link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=266834|http://z.iwethey.org...?contentid=266834]

Just because some idiot uses certain features unwisely does not mean the language should be designed for the idiot.

Because if you really want to split hairs on this one, I've got some stories of longjmp usage.

Or in MS-DOS days, poking a few values in a certain register and jumping to zero. hhhheeeeeeheheheheehe. Warm boot from my program as a last ditch effort.

Sometimes when you setup public workstations that's all you can do.

Seriously, Bryce, I'm not saying this to be mean, but... - (CRConrad) - (34) - June 17, 2007, 08:13:32 PM EDT

You mean the "payroll" example? Not very specific - (tablizer) - (31) - June 18, 2007, 01:01:29 AM EDT

What are you on about? No, absolutely not "Payroll example"! - (CRConrad) - (1) - June 18, 2007, 04:55:28 AM EDT

Okay, I see it now - (tablizer) - June 18, 2007, 11:20:34 AM EDT

Wow, deja vu (hypothetically) - (drewk) - (28) - June 18, 2007, 07:40:32 PM EDT

Which one? - (tablizer) - (27) - June 18, 2007, 08:10:39 PM EDT

Neither - (drewk) - (26) - June 18, 2007, 09:45:52 PM EDT

Thank you, that was very helpful - (tablizer) - (25) - June 19, 2007, 04:20:37 PM EDT

No, thank *you* - (drewk) - June 19, 2007, 07:03:55 PM EDT

Burden Of Proof - (pwhysall) - (23) - June 20, 2007, 01:12:48 AM EDT

thats easy c++ :-) -NT - (boxley) - (19) - June 20, 2007, 07:37:40 AM EDT

idontnowatumeenbox.c++isorlrite - (pwhysall) - June 20, 2007, 07:48:50 AM EDT

C is a crippled language because it is a crippled language - (tablizer) - (17) - June 20, 2007, 11:35:54 AM EDT

I have always considered C to be . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (15) - June 20, 2007, 02:58:56 PM EDT

I disagree. - (admin) - (1) - June 20, 2007, 03:16:51 PM EDT

ICLPRD (new thread) - (static) - June 21, 2007, 12:28:09 AM EDT

Nah, Pascal was a teaching language - (hnick) - (5) - June 20, 2007, 05:54:38 PM EDT

According to Nicholas Wirth he did not . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (4) - June 20, 2007, 07:38:43 PM EDT

So who are you going to believe? - (hnick) - (2) - June 21, 2007, 07:26:29 AM EDT

Nah, you probably won't: "Argument". HTH! :-) -NT - (CRConrad) - June 21, 2007, 09:53:50 AM EDT

Early versions had only 16-bit integers . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - June 21, 2007, 10:59:41 AM EDT

Maybe not originally, but when he wrote Modula II - (jb4) - June 21, 2007, 11:32:50 PM EDT

I gotta say that... - (jb4) - (6) - June 21, 2007, 11:28:47 PM EDT

It's that stupid single exit point from a function - (crazy) - (5) - June 21, 2007, 11:35:13 PM EDT

I've got NO PROBLEM with that - (jb4) - (4) - June 24, 2007, 10:21:48 PM EDT

You ever have nested while and for loops? - (crazy) - (3) - June 24, 2007, 11:34:38 PM EDT

"Numereous flags" - (jb4) - (1) - June 27, 2007, 09:21:29 PM EDT

Didn't think so? - (crazy) - June 27, 2007, 09:46:24 PM EDT

That's a good way out. - (static) - June 29, 2007, 06:00:12 PM EDT

It is not the pinochle of procedural by a longshot, either. -NT - (jb4) - June 21, 2007, 11:26:07 PM EDT

All these years and you still misunderstand my opinion - (tablizer) - (2) - June 20, 2007, 11:34:27 AM EDT

Not misunderstand ... DISAGREE -NT - (drewk) - (1) - June 20, 2007, 07:53:14 PM EDT

If something is objectively better, then you should show why -NT - (tablizer) - June 21, 2007, 11:20:59 AM EDT

Perhaps, more examples of naivity? - (warmachine) - (1) - June 18, 2007, 05:35:42 AM EDT

Lots of 'em-they're the very ones I want him to (re)consider -NT - (CRConrad) - June 18, 2007, 07:46:40 AM EDT

I'm sure everyone who made this game is dead by now.
76 ms