IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Religion, Philosophy, Metaphysics Forum / how droll
Post #282,351
by boxley
4/19/07 9:30:11 AM
Reply
New how droll
"some mutations have no meaningful effect, such as eye colour."bzzt wrong
Just looking for the answer "I dont know" would have sufficed, but you had to prove you dont understand the science any more than I do. Your banging on the pope because he wont give up his core beliefs in exhange for yours shows that your dogma is a ossified as his.
thanx,
bill
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 51 years. meep

reach me at [link|mailto:bill.oxley@cox.net|mailto:bill.oxley@cox.net]
Post #282,353
by warmachine
4/19/07 9:33:30 AM
Reply
New Did I not say "that it's unknown"?
Matthew Greet


Choose Life. Choose a job. Choose a career. Choose a family. Choose a fucking big television, choose washing machines, cars, compact disc players and electrical tin openers. Choose good health, low cholesterol, and dental insurance. Choose fixed interest mortgage repayments. Choose a starter home. Choose your friends. Choose leisurewear and matching luggage. Choose DIY and wondering who the fuck you are on a Sunday morning. Choose sitting on that couch watching mind-numbing, spirit-crushing game shows, stuffing fucking junk food into your mouth. Choose rotting away at the end of it all, pishing your last in a miserable home, nothing more than an embarrassment to the selfish, fucked up brats you spawned to replace yourself. Choose your future. Choose life... But why would I want to do a thing like that? I chose not to choose life. I chose somethin' else. And the reasons? There are no reasons. Who needs reasons when you've got heroin?
- Mark Renton, Trainspotting.
     Pope carefully backtracks on Evolution - (JayMehaffey) - (21) - April 11, 2007, 09:10:08 PM EDT
         He can't contradict his predecessor? - (warmachine) - (5) - April 12, 2007, 07:55:16 AM EDT
             Technically he could - (JayMehaffey) - (4) - April 12, 2007, 08:40:50 AM EDT
                 "Only in matters of 'faith and morals'" re - (Ashton) - (3) - April 13, 2007, 03:48:31 AM EDT
                     Yup. Me too. And futile is right. :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - April 13, 2007, 07:42:08 AM EDT
                     Re: "Only in matters of 'faith and morals'" re - (JayMehaffey) - (1) - April 13, 2007, 08:57:56 AM EDT
                         Agree re the practical effect, on the plebs - (Ashton) - April 13, 2007, 09:30:53 PM EDT
         Tough beans - (Silverlock) - April 12, 2007, 08:08:09 AM EDT
         Consitituency - (ChrisR) - April 12, 2007, 05:05:26 PM EDT
         Whatever you say Mr Nowhere Man -NT - (tuberculosis) - April 12, 2007, 07:39:07 PM EDT
         A classic ID dismissal is gone - (warmachine) - (9) - April 13, 2007, 08:38:49 AM EDT
             Give the pope a break! - (GBert) - (8) - April 17, 2007, 12:09:07 PM EDT
                 Sure, when he stops supporting mythology - (warmachine) - (7) - April 17, 2007, 01:55:07 PM EDT
                     he is not a scirntist but a theologian - (boxley) - (6) - April 17, 2007, 02:00:15 PM EDT
                         They're not mutually exclusive - (warmachine) - (5) - April 17, 2007, 08:30:37 PM EDT
                             please explain the following, only using evolutionary dogma - (boxley) - (4) - April 17, 2007, 10:07:23 PM EDT
                                 Dogma? -NT - (Silverlock) - April 17, 2007, 10:19:35 PM EDT
                                 This is relevant? - (warmachine) - (2) - April 19, 2007, 09:21:20 AM EDT
                                     how droll - (boxley) - (1) - April 19, 2007, 09:30:11 AM EDT
                                         Did I not say "that it's unknown"? -NT - (warmachine) - April 19, 2007, 09:33:30 AM EDT
         The Economist weighs in. - (Another Scott) - (1) - April 20, 2007, 06:55:56 AM EDT
             Yes A very depressing article - (Seamus) - April 21, 2007, 09:28:54 AM EDT

Yes to oranges! Grapefruit FORBIDDEN!
95 ms