IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Open Forum / Nope, I think the effect of the planes were minimal
Post #279,064
by crazy
3/21/07 2:43:47 PM
Reply
New Nope, I think the effect of the planes were minimal
as compared to perfectly placed explosives.

So your comment means you believe it is more likely for the plane to cause a perfect pancake due to a random hit at a random angle producing a random fire, melting steel in multiple balanced locations, then a bunch of experts planning it out?
Post #279,067
by bepatient
Picture of bepatient
3/21/07 2:47:06 PM
Reply
New You missed what he is saying
He is saying that the effect of the planes would have screwed the balance of the "perfectly placed explosives".

Instead, the building design itself would make a fire of the intensity seen there cause the floors to pancake and pull the building straight down...just like the engineering review said.
Too much of today's music is fashionable crap dressed as artistry.Adrian Belew
     Rosie on 9/11 - (bepatient) - (20) - March 21, 2007, 11:49:22 AM EDT
         Your standard response is no one can keep a secret - (crazy) - (19) - March 21, 2007, 01:19:50 PM EDT
             But at least you admit to "crazy" - (bepatient) - (3) - March 21, 2007, 01:29:19 PM EDT
                 Oh, no, I believe the planes hit - (crazy) - (2) - March 21, 2007, 02:40:29 PM EDT
                     more fake film then. - (bepatient) - March 21, 2007, 02:43:56 PM EDT
                     Grrr. - (Another Scott) - March 21, 2007, 02:59:08 PM EDT
             Re: Your standard response is no one can keep a secret - (JayMehaffey) - (2) - March 21, 2007, 01:52:50 PM EDT
                 Nope, I think the effect of the planes were minimal - (crazy) - (1) - March 21, 2007, 02:43:47 PM EDT
                     You missed what he is saying - (bepatient) - March 21, 2007, 02:47:06 PM EDT
             Grr. - (Another Scott) - (2) - March 21, 2007, 02:28:11 PM EDT
                 Additionally - (bepatient) - March 21, 2007, 02:33:45 PM EDT
                 But I AM Crazy, so it my job to feed the nuts -NT - (crazy) - March 21, 2007, 02:45:05 PM EDT
             No-one can provide a credible REASON for the conspiracy. -NT - (pwhysall) - (8) - March 21, 2007, 03:16:52 PM EDT
                 No? - (crazy) - (7) - March 21, 2007, 03:28:17 PM EDT
                     Like they didn't have that before. - (pwhysall) - (6) - March 21, 2007, 03:31:06 PM EDT
                         Who said it was the government? - (crazy) - (5) - March 21, 2007, 03:41:51 PM EDT
                             It didn't take a conspiracy of volition - (Silverlock) - March 21, 2007, 03:45:20 PM EDT
                             Is there any evidence at all for this? - (pwhysall) - (3) - March 21, 2007, 04:02:27 PM EDT
                                 But if there is - (bepatient) - (2) - March 21, 2007, 04:05:14 PM EDT
                                     Penn & Teller's take - (bepatient) - (1) - March 21, 2007, 05:05:36 PM EDT
                                         More Video - (bepatient) - March 21, 2007, 05:16:17 PM EDT

Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
84 ms