US Attorneys being fired? - (static) - (36) - March 13, 2007, 08:37:43 AM EDT
         Seems to be holding up - (JayMehaffey) - (10) - March 13, 2007, 08:55:30 AM EDT
             Josh Marshall has been on this for a while now. - (Silverlock) - (2) - March 13, 2007, 11:20:52 AM EDT
                 In today's dead-tree Milw. Journal-Sentinel - (jb4) - March 13, 2007, 05:59:31 PM EDT
                 A decent apology to Josh from Time's DC bureau chief - (rcareaga) - March 13, 2007, 08:50:34 PM EDT
             new insight into the issue - (boxley) - (3) - March 13, 2007, 01:40:28 PM EDT
                 I don't think it's happend this late in a term before... - (Another Scott) - (1) - March 13, 2007, 01:53:42 PM EDT
                     Along with the fact - (lincoln) - March 14, 2007, 03:59:32 PM EDT
                 This is different - they were threatened - (tuberculosis) - March 13, 2007, 05:20:09 PM EDT
             There's something I can't help thinking. - (static) - (2) - March 13, 2007, 10:22:24 PM EDT
                 Re: There's something I can't help thinking. - (JayMehaffey) - March 13, 2007, 10:33:33 PM EDT
                 The press is no longer fully complicit - (tuberculosis) - March 14, 2007, 12:50:39 AM EDT
         Washington Post blog series about Gonzales. Part 1 of 4. - (Another Scott) - (6) - March 13, 2007, 07:35:05 PM EDT
             Same as the former CO at Walter Reed - (drewk) - (5) - March 13, 2007, 07:40:20 PM EDT
                 Y'know what that sounds like? - (static) - (4) - March 13, 2007, 10:18:23 PM EDT
                     Nah, I don't think that was quite DrooK's point. - (CRConrad) - (3) - March 14, 2007, 03:20:20 AM EDT
                         "The past exonerative" - (Another Scott) - March 14, 2007, 07:56:03 AM EDT
                         [dup] -NT - (static) - March 14, 2007, 10:34:19 PM EDT
                         Fine distinction, there. - (static) - March 14, 2007, 10:33:50 PM EDT
         DOJ plan to appoint replacements without Sen. confirmation - (Another Scott) - (1) - March 13, 2007, 11:38:45 PM EDT
             Once again, it's the imperial presidency and un-American! -NT - (a6l6e6x) - March 14, 2007, 05:15:34 PM EDT
         This is all pretty darned funny - (bepatient) - (15) - March 14, 2007, 08:40:48 PM EDT
             Stay tuned. Well that didn't take long. Perjury, anyone? - (Another Scott) - (3) - March 14, 2007, 10:22:50 PM EDT
                 So they should have replaced all 93 for the 2nd term - (bepatient) - (2) - March 14, 2007, 10:36:15 PM EDT
                     No. - (Another Scott) - (1) - March 14, 2007, 10:47:05 PM EDT
                         Impeach him then. - (bepatient) - March 15, 2007, 08:08:38 AM EDT
             Clinton replaced them all at the BEGINNING of his first term - (CRConrad) - (2) - March 14, 2007, 10:15:24 PM EDT
                 I guess everyone else read the archives, too -NT - (drewk) - (1) - March 14, 2007, 10:22:19 PM EDT
                     Im at August 14 last year. I'll catch up, then go to bed :-) -NT - (CRConrad) - March 14, 2007, 10:29:25 PM EDT
             You missed my point. - (static) - March 14, 2007, 10:37:31 PM EDT
             The inane "Clinton did it too" defense - (lincoln) - (4) - March 15, 2007, 04:51:29 PM EDT
                 the height of intellectual dishonesty == Repo.SOP() - (jb4) - (3) - March 15, 2007, 05:15:23 PM EDT
                     Yeah. What I don't get... - (CRConrad) - (2) - March 15, 2007, 05:23:10 PM EDT
                         My take (FWIW) - (jb4) - (1) - March 15, 2007, 05:38:57 PM EDT
                             It isn't really worth that much. - (bepatient) - March 15, 2007, 06:03:52 PM EDT
             Justice Dept. Would Have Kept 'Loyal' Prosecutors - (lincoln) - (1) - March 16, 2007, 03:15:27 PM EDT
                 #278282. :-) - (Another Scott) - March 16, 2007, 03:39:44 PM EDT