So then, for 'rudeness' you lose a job. Period - no details needed. Not surprised; don't want you on my jury, either.
Or was it an "expression of disapproval of the performance of a politician, while he is actively soliciting votes, at a time nearing polling?" Where lies the First Amendment, amidst the debris of so many others?
That linked brief summary is so stark, the conclusion you leaped-to is about >you< - not about any of the circumstances which you know nothing of:
Imagining that a gesture [was it momentary? or sustained for 5 city blocks?] is "endangering" your progeny! implying that both hands must steer 100% of the time:
I'll bet YOU don't have both hands on your steering wheel 100% of the time the car is moving. And I'll bet that when you remove one to pick your nose: the car [hasn't crashed yet or we'd have heard.]
Just pure Authoritarian sophistry of the control-freak kind - to imagine.. that her gesture endangered anyone, or that these '06 kids were :-0
SHOCKED..! SHOCKED..! SHOCKED..!
Oh, the HORROR (I'm sure they don't see any dead Iraqi kids on their tube, either.)
If, in fact - the kids looking at the Prezmobile could even see the gesture (?)
But even if they could, it is purest hypocrisy to consider the scale of 'rude gesture to a pol' at the end of his campaign <==> equivalent to any snap-judgment of loss of livelihood.
ie I demur.