Eventually he'll have to accept what he gets.

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #267,702

by a6l6e6x

9/15/06 9:23:18 PM

Eventually he'll have to accept what he gets.

And whatever he says at the time, it won't be what he's asking for now. McCain, et al recognize that if the US stoops to Bush's level, we will have lost any remaining semblance of respect from the civilized world.

Alex

For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? -- Bible, Mark 8:36

Post #267,734

by Ashton

9/16/06 5:38:51 AM

9/16/06 5:42:02 AM

I hadn't watched The McLauglin shout-extravaganza (PBS) much

Hardly at all ~ past 2 years; who wants to see manic interruptions in lieu of subject/predicate?
Lately, initially by er, dial-accident - I've caught a couple.. now more often, as the bombastic McL hisself appears to have undrunk the Kool-Aid.

Tonight's spectacle saw him using the diamond ram and anvil in megaton press, simple declarative sentences - bluntly addressing the world-wide-fact that the US has blown, now every semblance of moral suasion it once possessed. (Every time Shrub 'explains' something... well, you know.)

He's even got Buchanan and the regular weird-Hawkish ones stumbling all-over in Gonzalesian bafflegab ... culminating in excruciating concession.

Lovely skit, by comparison with all previous rah-rahs for Victory-at-any-Cost.
But as ever, unspeakably Sad.. to be unavoidably associated-with these lunatics, by mere accident of one's geographic birth.

oypT

Edited by Ashton Sept. 16, 2006, 05:42:02 AM EDT

Expand All History

Bush pushes on terrorism proposal - (JayMehaffey) - (77) - Sept. 15, 2006, 12:43:36 PM EDT

What's to clarify? - (jbrabeck) - (63) - Sept. 15, 2006, 01:27:37 PM EDT

What, specifically, do those things mean? - (bepatient) - (62) - Sept. 15, 2006, 02:52:40 PM EDT

Good points, but... - (jbrabeck) - (52) - Sept. 15, 2006, 03:18:17 PM EDT

You and I agree on the SH point - (bepatient) - (51) - Sept. 15, 2006, 04:08:01 PM EDT

That I would agree too. - (jbrabeck) - (50) - Sept. 15, 2006, 05:41:39 PM EDT

What two things are the admin pushing? - (Silverlock) - (49) - Sept. 15, 2006, 06:03:39 PM EDT

Its not >re< definition - (bepatient) - (48) - Sept. 15, 2006, 09:49:23 PM EDT

It's not that difficult, IMHO. - (Another Scott) - (36) - Sept. 16, 2006, 12:21:26 AM EDT

Gimme a break on that - (bepatient) - (35) - Sept. 16, 2006, 12:47:51 AM EDT

I think we're talking past each other. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Sept. 16, 2006, 10:02:52 AM EDT

Maybe not - (bepatient) - Sept. 16, 2006, 03:39:43 PM EDT

be careful what you wish for.... - (Simon_Jester) - (32) - Sept. 16, 2006, 01:38:32 PM EDT

I am completely fine with that. - (bepatient) - (31) - Sept. 16, 2006, 03:50:53 PM EDT

It sure as hell ain't that churchly fornication thing - (Ashton) - Sept. 17, 2006, 05:58:53 AM EDT

What about when the "clarification" is used on US troops? - (Silverlock) - (29) - Sept. 17, 2006, 08:07:17 AM EDT

Considering the alternative - (bepatient) - (28) - Sept. 17, 2006, 10:08:56 AM EDT

What other people do doesn't matter. What we do does. - (pwhysall) - (3) - Sept. 17, 2006, 11:09:13 AM EDT

Hear, hear! -NT - (imric) - Sept. 17, 2006, 01:31:10 PM EDT

No argument. -NT - (bepatient) - Sept. 17, 2006, 02:49:18 PM EDT

No. - (mmoffitt) - Sept. 18, 2006, 12:05:21 PM EDT

The altenative to waterboarding is beheading? - (imric) - (22) - Sept. 17, 2006, 01:30:30 PM EDT

Who would be capturing our troops? - (bepatient) - (21) - Sept. 17, 2006, 02:50:28 PM EDT

So friggin' what? - (imric) - (20) - Sept. 17, 2006, 05:13:31 PM EDT

You are missing the point. - (bepatient) - (19) - Sept. 17, 2006, 10:12:07 PM EDT

FOLLOW ALONG? - (imric) - (18) - Sept. 17, 2006, 10:28:06 PM EDT

lest I have to repeat myself again - (bepatient) - (17) - Sept. 17, 2006, 11:05:49 PM EDT

And that doesn't matter, dude. - (imric) - (16) - Sept. 17, 2006, 11:39:53 PM EDT

Its not a rationalization - (bepatient) - (15) - Sept. 17, 2006, 11:47:58 PM EDT

Allow me to repeat myself - (Silverlock) - (3) - Sept. 18, 2006, 12:02:46 AM EDT

Why not, its more fun. -NT - (bepatient) - (2) - Sept. 18, 2006, 12:03:23 AM EDT

You're troll-fu has been weak for awhile now - (Silverlock) - (1) - Sept. 18, 2006, 12:08:49 AM EDT

Haven't hit the warning track yet. - (bepatient) - Sept. 18, 2006, 12:16:52 AM EDT

If it is a simple fact, - (imric) - (10) - Sept. 18, 2006, 07:09:34 AM EDT

I think we've missed his point - (jbrabeck) - (2) - Sept. 18, 2006, 08:20:04 AM EDT

Not quite. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Sept. 18, 2006, 08:33:54 AM EDT

Nope, you haven't. - (bepatient) - Sept. 18, 2006, 08:43:46 AM EDT

No - (bepatient) - (6) - Sept. 18, 2006, 08:42:48 AM EDT

No, it doesn't. - (imric) - (5) - Sept. 18, 2006, 08:59:26 AM EDT

All valid points - (bepatient) - (4) - Sept. 18, 2006, 09:27:22 AM EDT

Please quote what you're responding to. - (Another Scott) - (3) - Sept. 18, 2006, 10:38:43 AM EDT

Your problem is with who you attribute the desire. - (bepatient) - (2) - Sept. 18, 2006, 11:49:06 AM EDT

That's what I was trying to say - (jbrabeck) - (1) - Sept. 18, 2006, 01:39:38 PM EDT

And my response was affirmative to you - (bepatient) - Sept. 18, 2006, 01:45:44 PM EDT

Technically speaking.... - (Simon_Jester) - Sept. 17, 2006, 01:30:56 PM EDT

This is so inherently a fool's errand, though - - (Ashton) - (1) - Sept. 16, 2006, 05:08:34 AM EDT

Exactly. - (Another Scott) - Sept. 16, 2006, 10:11:39 AM EDT

Clarification defeats the purpose. - (Silverlock) - (8) - Sept. 16, 2006, 08:03:29 PM EDT

Sure, I get it - (bepatient) - (7) - Sept. 16, 2006, 08:52:17 PM EDT

Well, after all - (jake123) - Sept. 16, 2006, 09:21:31 PM EDT

It's not like people aren't interrogated all the time. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Sept. 16, 2006, 09:56:53 PM EDT

Chuckle - (bepatient) - Sept. 16, 2006, 10:32:05 PM EDT

How do you know they're terrorists? - (pwhysall) - (3) - Sept. 17, 2006, 03:09:50 AM EDT

Valid point. - (bepatient) - (2) - Sept. 17, 2006, 10:19:13 AM EDT

Oh, that's OK then. - (pwhysall) - (1) - Sept. 17, 2006, 11:06:06 AM EDT

That was nowhere near the point of that post - (bepatient) - Sept. 17, 2006, 02:51:48 PM EDT

Don't be evil -NT - (Silverlock) - Sept. 15, 2006, 03:21:48 PM EDT

the presidents argument is clearly wrong - (boxley) - (2) - Sept. 15, 2006, 09:32:28 PM EDT

Wrong? Possibly in extent he took it - (bepatient) - (1) - Sept. 15, 2006, 09:56:27 PM EDT

It's a long way - (imric) - Sept. 16, 2006, 08:43:48 AM EDT

Your being far to generous - (JayMehaffey) - (4) - Sept. 16, 2006, 06:05:26 PM EDT

Yes, and the fact that they can and Did proceed in this way - (Ashton) - (3) - Sept. 17, 2006, 05:34:40 AM EDT

Right...provable lies - (bepatient) - (2) - Sept. 17, 2006, 10:12:53 AM EDT

I never promised you a rose garden. -NT - (Ashton) - (1) - Sept. 18, 2006, 06:25:55 AM EDT

I wouldn't want the job. -NT - (bepatient) - Sept. 18, 2006, 08:44:33 AM EDT

Eventually he'll have to accept what he gets. - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - Sept. 15, 2006, 09:23:18 PM EDT

I hadn't watched The McLauglin shout-extravaganza (PBS) much - (Ashton) - Sept. 16, 2006, 05:42:02 AM EDT

everything old is new again (40KB image) - (rcareaga) - (4) - Sept. 16, 2006, 02:31:08 PM EDT

WOW! - (lincoln) - (3) - Sept. 16, 2006, 05:04:59 PM EDT

Just lucky, I guess - (rcareaga) - (2) - Sept. 16, 2006, 05:36:38 PM EDT

Yes, I recognize that little girl - - (Ashton) - (1) - Sept. 17, 2006, 05:40:50 AM EDT

It's Ann Coulter -NT - (imqwerky) - Sept. 17, 2006, 11:48:37 AM EDT

You know...this ignores the larger issue.... - (Simon_Jester) - (4) - Sept. 17, 2006, 01:45:06 PM EDT

Shush! We gotta protect our Sekrets! - (Another Scott) - Sept. 17, 2006, 02:07:08 PM EDT

What constitutes legal methods in GC and thus US law - (bepatient) - (2) - Sept. 17, 2006, 03:05:09 PM EDT

Have you seen the Senate Armed Services bill? - (Another Scott) - (1) - Sept. 17, 2006, 05:31:50 PM EDT

They shouldn't have caved there. - (bepatient) - Sept. 17, 2006, 10:14:38 PM EDT

Tom Malinowski OpEd at the Washington Post. - (Another Scott) - Sept. 17, 2006, 11:42:07 PM EDT

iwethey.org

Can those of you in the back hear me?
169 ms