I think my original posts were clear enough.
"This is so delicious. I can't believe I have been blessed with you. More! More! Dude, if you want to dip your toes in the legal pond for a while you would be well advised to steer clear of the famed "weasel word" defense."
What did you intend to say?
"Let me guess.......you hardly ever lose an argument do you?"
You'd be wrong. But I don't supposed you'll believe that. You haven't so far.
"My guess is that you kick the chessboard every time your Queen gets her skirt blown up."
content == zero (again)
"Does it not strike you as ironic that in the *same* post where you are pedantically squealing about me saying you "requalified" something you also want to extend yourself the privileges of not needing to use precise language?"
In your opinion or mine?
I was talking about you taking a post of mine out of context.
That is NOT the same as you insisting that everytime I make a statement it must apply to 100% of individuals.
"In the SAME post! lmao THE FUCKING SAME POST!"
You quoted me out of context. Out of context. Deal with it.
START QUOTE
"Mike:The Second World War was most definitely NOT fought according to the rule of law."
...
useless crap deleted
...
Brandioch:>> I pointed out that even after MILLIONS were killed in WWII, we
Brandioch:>> still followed the rules and treated the prisoners with basic
Brandioch:>> human civility (far better than they deserved, but we're
Brandioch:>> representing the good guys here).
LINK=[link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=25863|http://z.iwethey.or...tentid=25863]
END QUOTE
Again, you seem to be UNABLE to grasp the simple fact that I was talking about our treatment of the POW's after the war.
In fact, I have ON SEVERAL FUCKING OCCASIONS pointed out that we dropped nukes on WOMEN, CHILDREN AND THE WOUNDED.
But that doesn't fit the point you want to make so you will ONCE AGAIN skip over it.
Unfortunately, it was the point I was making so your "rebutal" of my position keeps falling apart when I point out that what you're claiming I said was actually taken out of context.
Context. It's what you keep missing.
Reminder, I said we nuked women and children.
You said I said that we fought WWII accourding to the rules of war.
I said we nuked women and children.
You said I said we fought WWII accourding to the rules of war.
Eventually, I will have to presume that you think nuking women and children is in accourdance with the rules of war.
I would suggest you reconsider that opinion.
