IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 2 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Was going to say, "wasn't it that Indian guy?"...
...but fortunately the Other Scott saved me from the humiliation of not remembering the name.

I *think* the thing about the number is that it's the lowest one that is the sum of two cubes, in two different ways (i'e, it's the lowest one that can be written both A^3+B^3 and C^3+D^3 (where A, B, C, and D are presumably positive integers)). Or was that 1741?


   [link|mailto:MyUserId@MyISP.CountryCode|Christian R. Conrad]
(I live in Finland, and my e-mail in-box is at the Saunalahti company.)
Your lies are of Microsoftian Scale and boring to boot. Your 'depression' may be the closest you ever come to recognizing truth: you have no 'inferiority complex', you are inferior - and something inside you recognizes this. - [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=71575|Ashton Brown]
New It was the sum of 2 cubes
1729 = 1^3 + 12^3 = 9^3 + 10^3.

Cheers,
Ben
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
New Hey, I got his name right. :-)
[link|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1729_(anecdote)|1729].

Thanks.

Cheers,
Scott.
     Can you find the pattern? - (inthane-chan) - (31)
         Looks like there are squares and sums of squares involved... -NT - (Another Scott)
         I recall a series, demo'ed on a blackboard - (Ashton) - (6)
             Ramanujan. - (Another Scott)
             Was going to say, "wasn't it that Indian guy?"... - (CRConrad) - (2)
                 It was the sum of 2 cubes - (ben_tilly) - (1)
                     Hey, I got his name right. :-) - (Another Scott)
             Holy Prodigy, Mathman - (Ashton) - (1)
                 :-) -NT - (Another Scott)
         No, I'm not insane. - (Silverlock) - (4)
             It's a trick. Get an axe. -NT - (tuberculosis) - (1)
                 No arthropoids. No lizards. No invertabrates. No ads. -NT - (inthane-chan)
             What does make me? - (warmachine) - (1)
                 er, lovable nutcase? -NT - (Ashton)
         I knew that. - (imqwerky)
         I reckon none - (warmachine) - (15)
             Cool, thanks. - (inthane-chan) - (14)
                 Que? - (warmachine) - (11)
                     Basically. - (inthane-chan) - (10)
                         Bit of handhacking - (warmachine) - (9)
                             Sorry about that... - (inthane-chan)
                             Actually, it's silly - (warmachine) - (7)
                                 Actually, the whole thing is 'effects based'. - (inthane-chan) - (6)
                                     Real classics should flash or jiggle or fade to black. -NT - (tuberculosis)
                                     That's just plain nuts - (warmachine) - (4)
                                         It helps if you understand the action system. - (inthane-chan) - (3)
                                             Designers aren't maths geeks, then - (warmachine) - (2)
                                                 Whoops, misunderstanding. - (inthane-chan) - (1)
                                                     Different silliness, then - (warmachine)
                 A lot of times that stuff is hand-crafted. - (admin) - (1)
                     Yep. - (inthane-chan)
         You can't do it without spiral-boundedness. -NT - (tuberculosis)

With the mochas he was strong.
135 ms