IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Sure it would
There were reports that lightning hit the plane, but this wouldnt have been a causal factor in the crash.
If the strike caused one or more engines to shut down, you lose your engine braking.
===

Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
New Or short the stupid fly-by-wire crap.
bcnu,
Mikem

It would seem, therefore, that the three human impulses embodied in religion are fear, conceit, and hatred. The purpose of religion, one might say, is to give an air of respectibility to these passions. -- Bertrand Russell
New if airbus does the same testing as we do
and emp blast shouldnt affect the fly by wire, much less a lightning strike.
thanx,
bill
Just call me Mr. Lynch \\

Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 49 years. meep
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
New Oops, forgot the <sarcasm>
Edit: By "we" you mean Boeing I take it? And there is ONE HUGE DIFFERENCE. Pilots of Boeing aircraft can turn the FBW off! Airbus First Officers and Captains can't. And the Airbus has a glorious history of that being a not-so-good idea.
bcnu,
Mikem

It would seem, therefore, that the three human impulses embodied in religion are fear, conceit, and hatred. The purpose of religion, one might say, is to give an air of respectibility to these passions. -- Bertrand Russell
Expand Edited by mmoffitt Aug. 3, 2005, 11:48:14 AM EDT
New Yeah, but they dont think that is what happened here.
They're not even sure lightning hit the plane. The Canadian Safety Board will figure it out.
     Airplanes and dateless nights - (bionerd) - (73)
         Sure it would - (drewk) - (4)
             Or short the stupid fly-by-wire crap. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                 if airbus does the same testing as we do - (boxley) - (1)
                     Oops, forgot the <sarcasm> - (mmoffitt)
             Yeah, but they dont think that is what happened here. - (bionerd)
         Nit. Airbus is not exclusively French. - (mmoffitt) - (67)
             I know - (bionerd) - (1)
                 Forgot something. - (mmoffitt)
             This one was... it was Air France -NT - (jake123) - (64)
                 Air France Concord - (bionerd) - (63)
                     Please madame, it is Concorde! :) -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (62)
                         Potato/Potatoe - (bionerd) - (61)
                             "BA flew to NY in 2 hours 34 minutes and all I got ..." :-) -NT - (Another Scott)
                             Feh. The Shuttle does it a lot faster. - (mmoffitt) - (48)
                                 I certainly try to avoid landing in aircraft of any kind -NT - (tuberculosis) - (47)
                                     No accounting for taste, I guess. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (46)
                                         Look what happened to that "perfectly good airplane" -NT - (tuberculosis) - (45)
                                             Who said it was "perfectly good"? It was FBW donchaknow. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (44)
                                                 Is that really so much less reliable than FBM? - (tuberculosis) - (43)
                                                     Um, it would have been nice to FBM on these. - (mmoffitt) - (42)
                                                         What the intent behind FBW? - (admin) - (41)
                                                             A few things - (tuberculosis) - (15)
                                                                 Interesting. - (admin)
                                                                 Problem is digital failure is ... well, digital - (drewk)
                                                                 When it's accepted on automobiles, I'll be a believer. -NT - (a6l6e6x)
                                                                 United 232 - (bionerd) - (11)
                                                                     Probably not. - (inthane-chan) - (1)
                                                                         Re: Probably not. - (pwhysall)
                                                                     Re: Do regular people think about these things? - (a6l6e6x)
                                                                     ICLRPD (new thread) - (ben_tilly)
                                                                     Regular? - (Ashton) - (5)
                                                                         I recently found out that my FIL worked out there. - (Another Scott) - (4)
                                                                             {chortle} - (Ashton) - (3)
                                                                                 Thanks. Is this your old haunting ground? - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                                                                     {snerfl} - (Ashton) - (1)
                                                                                         ad some hair to this picture, slim down the jawline - (boxley)
                                                                     not as much fun as picturing ground zero nuclear - (boxley)
                                                             Doesn't FBW mean - (imqwerky) - (4)
                                                                 FBW == Fly By Wire. HTH! -NT - (jb4) - (3)
                                                                     I know... :-D - (imqwerky) - (2)
                                                                         Let's examine the entrails a little more. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                                             I stand, er, sit corrected! :-P -NT - (imqwerky)
                                                             It's mostly a philosophical thing with me. </smirk> - (mmoffitt) - (19)
                                                                 I think this argues for better FBW actually - (tuberculosis) - (18)
                                                                     I agree. - (Another Scott)
                                                                     Say what? - (mmoffitt) - (16)
                                                                         What "trained pilot"? - (jb4) - (1)
                                                                             Doh! </me slaps self on forehead> - (mmoffitt)
                                                                         My guess - (tuberculosis) - (13)
                                                                             in an f16 turn off the computer - (boxley) - (1)
                                                                                 You're so much more succinct that I am. - (tuberculosis)
                                                                             Then why do Boeing FBW aircraft *all* have "off" switches? - (mmoffitt) - (10)
                                                                                 Probably the pilots demanded them. - (Andrew Grygus) - (4)
                                                                                     I always like this one. - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                                                                                         But at Mach 3, you'll get found REAL fast.... - (jb4) - (1)
                                                                                             Or 3 states away from where you're supposed to be. ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt)
                                                                                     As goes chess ---> so goes 'piloting'___[???] (new thread) - (Ashton)
                                                                                 IIRC, depends on aircraft design - (tonytib) - (4)
                                                                                     Actually, it won't be the USAF/USN that are the first to... - (CRConrad) - (3)
                                                                                         Guess the F117 doesn't count? -NT - (drewk) - (2)
                                                                                             Which first flew in 1977. -NT - (pwhysall)
                                                                                             Live and learn. I only knew it was butt-ugly. ;-) -NT - (CRConrad)
                             Very possible to have lunch - (bepatient) - (10)
                                 OT: Hey Beep. - (mmoffitt) - (6)
                                     Re: OT: Hey Beep. - (bepatient) - (5)
                                         K. Thanks. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (4)
                                             Got any links? Will follow up. -NT - (bepatient) - (3)
                                                 Here's a couple. - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                                                     I know there's support for this - (bepatient) - (1)
                                                         I don't think its that far off. - (mmoffitt)
                                 Do tell! - (rcareaga) - (2)
                                     Dunno about him, but a girl I worked with did it this way. - (mmoffitt)
                                     Biz trip - (bepatient)

I valued your opinion more when I was being paid to.
112 ms