Post #207,190
5/12/05 9:42:21 PM
|
well if
Q moves between k and p only the k can move which allows Q to eat pawn and either the k kills Q, moves down one square (but Q can get him) move up one square and K can get him or move sideways Q can get him. What other option do they have? Keep it out of the subject line or CRC will start whining again :-)
thanx,
bill
All tribal myths are true, for a given value of "true" Terry Pratchett
[link|http://boxleys.blogspot.com/|http://boxleys.blogspot.com/]
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 48 years. meep
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
|
Post #207,193
5/12/05 10:52:20 PM
|
You are taking more than 2 moves to win.
The sequence is white moves, black moves, then white delivers checkmate. If you take longer than that, then you haven't found the answer.
FYI an 8 year old kid did this problem in 3 minutes.
Cheers,
Ben
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
|
Post #207,199
5/12/05 10:59:22 PM
|
Re: You are taking more than 2 moves to win.
K moves to block k from the left, leaving k one legal move...
|
Post #207,201
5/12/05 11:15:39 PM
5/12/05 11:53:29 PM
|
Let's put that in algebraic notation...
I'll edit this one as well since it makes explicit a partial attempt on the problem.
Remember that it is only a solution once you can fill in that mysterious second move and deliver checkmate.
Cheers,
Ben
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
Edited by ben_tilly
May 12, 2005, 11:53:29 PM EDT
|
Post #207,205
5/12/05 11:29:04 PM
|
Intentially vague
Why spoil it for other people?
|
Post #207,206
5/12/05 11:43:40 PM
5/12/05 11:44:01 PM
|
I'll hide my response to that in an edit then...
If anyone thinks that they have a full solution, they can hide it in the same way.
Cheers,
Ben
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
Edited by ben_tilly
May 12, 2005, 11:44:01 PM EDT
|
Post #207,211
5/13/05 12:31:11 AM
5/13/05 4:12:57 AM
|
Mixing notations...
solution in last edit
Edited by dws
May 13, 2005, 12:48:29 AM EDT
Edited by dws
May 13, 2005, 04:12:19 AM EDT
Edited by dws
May 13, 2005, 04:12:57 AM EDT
|
Post #207,213
5/13/05 12:44:48 AM
5/13/05 1:43:52 PM
|
Response in last edit
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
Edited by ben_tilly
May 13, 2005, 12:45:03 AM EDT
Edited by ben_tilly
May 13, 2005, 01:43:39 PM EDT
Edited by ben_tilly
May 13, 2005, 01:43:52 PM EDT
|
Post #207,268
5/13/05 2:03:00 PM
|
Dammit
That makes two of us need new glasses.
===
Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
|
