I'll hide my response to that in an edit then...

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #207,206 by ben_tilly 5/12/05 11:43:40 PM 5/12/05 11:44:01 PM Reply	I'll hide my response to that in an edit then... If anyone thinks that they have a full solution, they can hide it in the same way. Cheers, Ben I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother) Edited by ben_tilly May 12, 2005, 11:44:01 PM EDT I'll hide my response to that in an edit then... If anyone thinks that they have a full solution, they can hide it in the same way. It isn't a solution unless you can provide the second move that delivers checkmate. You haven't done that... There are lots of promising looking first moves. Only one delivers mate in 2. Cheers, Ben I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother) Collapse All History
Post #207,211 by dws 5/13/05 12:31:11 AM 5/13/05 4:12:57 AM Reply	Mixing notations... solution in last edit Edited by dws May 13, 2005, 12:48:29 AM EDT Edited by dws May 13, 2005, 04:12:19 AM EDT Edited by dws May 13, 2005, 04:12:57 AM EDT Expand All History
Post #207,213 by ben_tilly 5/13/05 12:44:48 AM 5/13/05 1:43:52 PM Reply	Response in last edit I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother) Edited by ben_tilly May 13, 2005, 12:45:03 AM EDT Edited by ben_tilly May 13, 2005, 01:43:39 PM EDT Edited by ben_tilly May 13, 2005, 01:43:52 PM EDT Expand All History
Post #207,268 by drewk 5/13/05 2:03:00 PM Reply	Dammit That makes two of us need new glasses. === Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link\|http://DocHope.com\|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats]. [link\|http://DocHope.com\|http://DocHope.com]

Mate in 2. - (ben_tilly) - (17) - May 12, 2005, 11:11:07 PM EDT

dunno the issue, whites move? - (boxley) - (10) - May 12, 2005, 09:33:32 PM EDT

The issue is finding mate in 2 - (ben_tilly) - (9) - May 12, 2005, 09:37:43 PM EDT

well if - (boxley) - (8) - May 12, 2005, 09:42:21 PM EDT

You are taking more than 2 moves to win. - (ben_tilly) - (7) - May 12, 2005, 10:52:20 PM EDT

Re: You are taking more than 2 moves to win. - (dws) - (6) - May 12, 2005, 10:59:22 PM EDT

Let's put that in algebraic notation... - (ben_tilly) - (5) - May 12, 2005, 11:53:29 PM EDT

Intentially vague - (dws) - (4) - May 12, 2005, 11:29:04 PM EDT

I'll hide my response to that in an edit then... - (ben_tilly) - (3) - May 12, 2005, 11:44:01 PM EDT

Mixing notations... - (dws) - (2) - May 13, 2005, 04:12:57 AM EDT

Response in last edit -NT - (ben_tilly) - May 13, 2005, 01:43:52 PM EDT

Dammit - (drewk) - May 13, 2005, 02:03:00 PM EDT

Nevermind. - (inthane-chan) - (1) - May 12, 2005, 11:56:32 PM EDT

Remember to show the entire finish, not just one move -NT - (ben_tilly) - May 13, 2005, 12:05:55 AM EDT

Re: Mate in 2. -NT - (inthane-chan) - (3) - April 26, 2006, 10:26:01 PM EDT

Complete solution? -NT - (ben_tilly) - (2) - April 27, 2006, 02:20:33 AM EDT

Edited. - (inthane-chan) - (1) - April 27, 2006, 10:35:36 PM EDT

Yup, please edit that subject line though. -NT - (ben_tilly) - April 27, 2006, 05:36:19 PM EDT

iwethey.org

Super-size it!
169 ms