IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New You are taking more than 2 moves to win.
The sequence is white moves, black moves, then white delivers checkmate. If you take longer than that, then you haven't found the answer.

FYI an 8 year old kid did this problem in 3 minutes.

Cheers,
Ben
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
New Re: You are taking more than 2 moves to win.
K moves to block k from the left, leaving k one legal move...
New Let's put that in algebraic notation...
I'll edit this one as well since it makes explicit a partial attempt on the problem.

Remember that it is only a solution once you can fill in that mysterious second move and deliver checkmate.

Cheers,
Ben
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
Expand Edited by ben_tilly May 12, 2005, 11:53:29 PM EDT
New Intentially vague
Why spoil it for other people?
New I'll hide my response to that in an edit then...
If anyone thinks that they have a full solution, they can hide it in the same way.

Cheers,
Ben
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
Expand Edited by ben_tilly May 12, 2005, 11:44:01 PM EDT
New Mixing notations...
solution in last edit
Expand Edited by dws May 13, 2005, 12:48:29 AM EDT
Expand Edited by dws May 13, 2005, 04:12:19 AM EDT
Expand Edited by dws May 13, 2005, 04:12:57 AM EDT
New Response in last edit
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
Expand Edited by ben_tilly May 13, 2005, 12:45:03 AM EDT
Expand Edited by ben_tilly May 13, 2005, 01:43:39 PM EDT
Expand Edited by ben_tilly May 13, 2005, 01:43:52 PM EDT
New Dammit
That makes two of us need new glasses.
===

Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
     Mate in 2. - (ben_tilly) - (17)
         dunno the issue, whites move? - (boxley) - (10)
             The issue is finding mate in 2 - (ben_tilly) - (9)
                 well if - (boxley) - (8)
                     You are taking more than 2 moves to win. - (ben_tilly) - (7)
                         Re: You are taking more than 2 moves to win. - (dws) - (6)
                             Let's put that in algebraic notation... - (ben_tilly) - (5)
                                 Intentially vague - (dws) - (4)
                                     I'll hide my response to that in an edit then... - (ben_tilly) - (3)
                                         Mixing notations... - (dws) - (2)
                                             Response in last edit -NT - (ben_tilly)
                                             Dammit - (drewk)
         Nevermind. - (inthane-chan) - (1)
             Remember to show the entire finish, not just one move -NT - (ben_tilly)
         Re: Mate in 2. -NT - (inthane-chan) - (3)
             Complete solution? -NT - (ben_tilly) - (2)
                 Edited. - (inthane-chan) - (1)
                     Yup, please edit that subject line though. -NT - (ben_tilly)

Just the facts, ma'am.
86 ms