Let's put that in algebraic notation...

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #207,201 by ben_tilly 5/12/05 11:15:39 PM 5/12/05 11:53:29 PM Reply	Let's put that in algebraic notation... I'll edit this one as well since it makes explicit a partial attempt on the problem. Remember that it is only a solution once you can fill in that mysterious second move and deliver checkmate. Cheers, Ben I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother) Edited by ben_tilly May 12, 2005, 11:53:29 PM EDT Let's put that in algebraic notation... If I understand you correctly, you're saying 1.D5-C4 F3-F4 2.??-?? (Or in the more compact notation they use in books, 1.Kc4 Kf4 2.??.) It is only a solution if you can fill in that mysterious second move and deliver checkmate. Cheers, Ben I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother) Collapse All History
Post #207,205 by dws 5/12/05 11:29:04 PM Reply	Intentially vague Why spoil it for other people?
Post #207,206 by ben_tilly 5/12/05 11:43:40 PM 5/12/05 11:44:01 PM Reply	I'll hide my response to that in an edit then... If anyone thinks that they have a full solution, they can hide it in the same way. Cheers, Ben I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother) Edited by ben_tilly May 12, 2005, 11:44:01 PM EDT Expand All History
Post #207,211 by dws 5/13/05 12:31:11 AM 5/13/05 4:12:57 AM Reply	Mixing notations... solution in last edit Edited by dws May 13, 2005, 12:48:29 AM EDT Edited by dws May 13, 2005, 04:12:19 AM EDT Edited by dws May 13, 2005, 04:12:57 AM EDT Expand All History
Post #207,213 by ben_tilly 5/13/05 12:44:48 AM 5/13/05 1:43:52 PM Reply	Response in last edit I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother) Edited by ben_tilly May 13, 2005, 12:45:03 AM EDT Edited by ben_tilly May 13, 2005, 01:43:39 PM EDT Edited by ben_tilly May 13, 2005, 01:43:52 PM EDT Expand All History
Post #207,268 by drewk 5/13/05 2:03:00 PM Reply	Dammit That makes two of us need new glasses. === Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link\|http://DocHope.com\|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats]. [link\|http://DocHope.com\|http://DocHope.com]

Mate in 2. - (ben_tilly) - (17) - May 12, 2005, 11:11:07 PM EDT

dunno the issue, whites move? - (boxley) - (10) - May 12, 2005, 09:33:32 PM EDT

The issue is finding mate in 2 - (ben_tilly) - (9) - May 12, 2005, 09:37:43 PM EDT

well if - (boxley) - (8) - May 12, 2005, 09:42:21 PM EDT

You are taking more than 2 moves to win. - (ben_tilly) - (7) - May 12, 2005, 10:52:20 PM EDT

Re: You are taking more than 2 moves to win. - (dws) - (6) - May 12, 2005, 10:59:22 PM EDT

Let's put that in algebraic notation... - (ben_tilly) - (5) - May 12, 2005, 11:53:29 PM EDT

Intentially vague - (dws) - (4) - May 12, 2005, 11:29:04 PM EDT

I'll hide my response to that in an edit then... - (ben_tilly) - (3) - May 12, 2005, 11:44:01 PM EDT

Mixing notations... - (dws) - (2) - May 13, 2005, 04:12:57 AM EDT

Response in last edit -NT - (ben_tilly) - May 13, 2005, 01:43:52 PM EDT

Dammit - (drewk) - May 13, 2005, 02:03:00 PM EDT

Nevermind. - (inthane-chan) - (1) - May 12, 2005, 11:56:32 PM EDT

Remember to show the entire finish, not just one move -NT - (ben_tilly) - May 13, 2005, 12:05:55 AM EDT

Re: Mate in 2. -NT - (inthane-chan) - (3) - April 26, 2006, 10:26:01 PM EDT

Complete solution? -NT - (ben_tilly) - (2) - April 27, 2006, 02:20:33 AM EDT

Edited. - (inthane-chan) - (1) - April 27, 2006, 10:35:36 PM EDT

Yup, please edit that subject line though. -NT - (ben_tilly) - April 27, 2006, 05:36:19 PM EDT

iwethey.org

Smarter than the av-er-age bear!
126 ms