IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 0
active users
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
Science Forum
/
^ Sorry, this was intended for Religion.
Post #190,669
by
mmoffitt
1/18/05 7:08:23 PM
Reply
^ Sorry, this was intended for Religion.
bcnu,
Mikem
Eine Leute. Eine Welt. Ein F\ufffdhrer.
(Just trying to be accepted in the New America)
A Win!
- (
imric
)
- (52)
- Jan. 14, 2005, 07:05:55 AM EST
Um, ...
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (51)
- Jan. 14, 2005, 08:29:18 AM EST
OK. Get this. Get it right.
- (
imric
)
- (50)
- Jan. 14, 2005, 09:00:45 AM EST
I don't think he does "get it"
- (
bepatient
)
- (20)
- Jan. 14, 2005, 09:39:20 AM EST
No, he didn't.
- (
pwhysall
)
- (14)
- Jan. 14, 2005, 10:34:39 AM EST
But his ruling..
- (
bepatient
)
- (13)
- Jan. 14, 2005, 10:38:30 AM EST
No.
- (
pwhysall
)
- (7)
- Jan. 14, 2005, 10:40:31 AM EST
ACLU made this point better
- (
drewk
)
- (6)
- Jan. 14, 2005, 03:12:28 PM EST
Thats a little better...
- (
bepatient
)
- (3)
- Jan. 14, 2005, 03:57:52 PM EST
It is a fine line
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- (2)
- Jan. 14, 2005, 04:08:12 PM EST
But I am less likely to...
- (
bepatient
)
- (1)
- Jan. 14, 2005, 04:35:54 PM EST
Other outcome would also have set precedent
- (
drewk
)
- Jan. 14, 2005, 07:52:01 PM EST
Next time someone says "evolution's just a theory"...
- (
pwhysall
)
- (1)
- Jan. 15, 2005, 03:40:37 AM EST
*GRIN*
-NT
- (
imric
)
- Jan. 15, 2005, 07:49:28 AM EST
Judge didn't say that.
- (
imric
)
- (4)
- Jan. 14, 2005, 11:26:17 AM EST
Assumes too much
- (
bepatient
)
- (3)
- Jan. 14, 2005, 01:18:19 PM EST
I must disagree.
- (
imric
)
- (2)
- Jan. 14, 2005, 01:35:28 PM EST
But the opposite
- (
bepatient
)
- (1)
- Jan. 14, 2005, 01:46:26 PM EST
Ummm.
- (
imric
)
- Jan. 14, 2005, 02:11:11 PM EST
Use the Source Beep!
- (
Another Scott
)
- (2)
- Jan. 14, 2005, 12:49:01 PM EST
a simple sticker that sez "evolution is gay" prob solved
- (
daemon
)
- (1)
- Jan. 17, 2005, 10:42:31 PM EST
Al punte - code words *indeed*
-NT
- (
Ashton
)
- Jan. 18, 2005, 09:36:44 PM EST
No, that is not too far
- (
ben_tilly
)
- Jan. 14, 2005, 04:50:22 PM EST
I see it more starkly -
- (
Ashton
)
- Jan. 15, 2005, 06:22:09 AM EST
Okay, now you get this.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (28)
- Jan. 14, 2005, 12:03:45 PM EST
Remember your Civics/Social Studies classes.
- (
imric
)
- (27)
- Jan. 14, 2005, 12:51:08 PM EST
ps. Should you feel the need to respond to this (new thread)
- (
imric
)
- Jan. 14, 2005, 12:55:13 PM EST
I'd also ban Nazis. That makes me Evul as well I guess.
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (25)
- Jan. 16, 2005, 02:45:23 PM EST
Yup.
- (
imric
)
- (24)
- Jan. 16, 2005, 03:07:57 PM EST
Right.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- Jan. 17, 2005, 09:09:20 AM EST
You know what has always slayed me?
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (22)
- Jan. 19, 2005, 08:54:40 AM EST
^ Sorry, this was intended for Religion.
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- Jan. 18, 2005, 07:08:23 PM EST
Gee. I guess it's my Christianity that makes me say that.
- (
imric
)
- (2)
- Jan. 18, 2005, 08:09:52 PM EST
It is an opiate.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (1)
- Jan. 19, 2005, 08:51:06 AM EST
Yawn. (new thread)
- (
FuManChu
)
- Jan. 19, 2005, 10:25:46 AM EST
Umm, point missed. "Godless" communism, eh?
- (
Silverlock
)
- (3)
- Jan. 18, 2005, 10:42:49 PM EST
<naive>Umm, aren't they the same?</naive>
-NT
- (
drewk
)
- (2)
- Jan. 18, 2005, 10:50:32 PM EST
You'll notice I used a lowercase "c"
-NT
- (
Silverlock
)
- (1)
- Jan. 18, 2005, 10:53:50 PM EST
Yes I did
-NT
- (
drewk
)
- Jan. 19, 2005, 12:23:48 AM EST
Problem is...
- (
Steven A S
)
- (1)
- Jan. 19, 2005, 09:07:50 AM EST
And did not claim to be.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- Jan. 19, 2005, 10:21:37 AM EST
The problem with "Communism" vs. "Real Socialism"
- (
Arkadiy
)
- (11)
- Jan. 19, 2005, 10:24:31 AM EST
Unvarnished pravda!
-NT
- (
a6l6e6x
)
- Jan. 19, 2005, 11:24:34 PM EST
"Human nature"
- (
Ashton
)
- (9)
- Jan. 20, 2005, 06:06:30 AM EST
Name me one philosophy that assumes
- (
Arkadiy
)
- (8)
- Jan. 20, 2005, 07:55:55 AM EST
Taoism.
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (4)
- Jan. 20, 2005, 09:09:49 AM EST
Not familiar enough with the history of China
- (
Arkadiy
)
- (3)
- Jan. 20, 2005, 11:09:11 AM EST
We have *lots* of experts around here
- (
drewk
)
- (1)
- Jan. 20, 2005, 12:15:44 PM EST
For starters, I'd like to hear one of them speak :)
-NT
- (
Arkadiy
)
- Jan. 20, 2005, 12:21:13 PM EST
"The name that can be named is not the eternal name."
- (
mmoffitt
)
- Jan. 20, 2005, 12:37:47 PM EST
By employing the very basis for the illusionary
- (
Ashton
)
- (2)
- Jan. 21, 2005, 01:55:43 AM EST
Thank you for mangling my words
- (
Arkadiy
)
- (1)
- Jan. 21, 2005, 06:37:42 PM EST
Ah well, rereading for nuance -
- (
Ashton
)
- Jan. 21, 2005, 11:19:50 PM EST
i
we
they
.org
Batches? BATCHES?? We don't need no steenkin' batches!
59 ms