Yawn

And the fact that you consider this situation in any way similar to WWI, II, Korea, or Vietnam...

Offhand I would say the common milieu for *any* State action transcends the always peculiar details of any next one:

At root: the bases for there *being* this particular State! Not merely the documents, Constitution and related - but our putative ethos? and the priorities which we preach at home and abroad (whether the preached-to think our sermons hypocritical? (sometimes) or merely sanctimonious! (often)).

We certainly cannot claim that ~we are inured to what others think of us (though many believe we Are inured to whatever it is - which others think, period). We live! to preach our magnificence and.. deem that our prosperity is related to Our Goodness. Est-ce que ce n'est pas vrai, mon cher?

Thus, all the above is mere rhetoric we amuse ourselves with, in strifeless intervals. It is in stressful periods ONLY - when we demonstrate what we Really believe. Like now.

Like Ashcroft and the hubris AND fearfulness in the now litany of new Official Laws for the Millennium: in form of dictats er Executive Orders - freed from those messy constraints, tiresome details like debate, public discussion, apprising of legislators, legislation by *Legislators* - opinion of judiciary. Etc.

Oh.. because we are in a hurry! Just as we were in a hurry, hours after after 12/7/41. Yet then, while we exaggerated the guesstimate of the loyalties of US Citizens of Japanese descent (also Italians, less so -oddly- Germans amongst us) -- at no time did we conceive of the Draconian hysterical mass of abortive intrusions into personal Rights, as are occurring in the present contretemps.

Common denominators? saboteurs (real and imagined) - looking Just Like Us\ufffd or.. different (too). Unknown 'plans', schemes, capacity! to commit nefarious deeds .. like maybe blowing up [all the same stuff as now]. Need more common denominators of all the past events and our responses?

{sheesh}

Yeah.. this one is *Different* all right: as are the wildest of imaginations, Each time. Only This time: we are willing to forget at lightning pace (da capo)

At root: the bases for there *being* this particular State! Kill Those to save That, but please to call it, "military necessity". Again.

A.
Imagine.. if Economics Principles finally ever won completely? over umm National Principles (if we still have any left next month). Imagine *that world*.
{shudder}

Post #18,485 by bepatient 11/15/01 8:28:54 PM Reply	Yawn You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #19,057 by CRConrad 11/20/01 9:57:22 PM Reply	What a fscking stupid non-response If you don't have anything to say, and can't just shut the fuck up, why don't you admit that you have no reasonable response, for once in a fucking while, BeeP? A stupid "Yawn" certainly doesn't make you look any more right, when it's obvious that you're just plain fucking wrong, you know. This may come as a shock to you, but this isn't the first time you've been wrong and Khasimioch right. Christian R. Conrad The Man Who Knows Fucking Everything
Post #19,094 by bepatient 11/21/01 9:39:06 AM Reply	To a continued idiotic line of reasoning. And the fact that you consider this situation in any way similar to WWI, II, Korea, or Vietnam... Well, I guess some folks just don't get it. You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #19,167 by Ashton 11/21/01 4:06:22 PM Reply	C'mon BeeP - missing all the common denominators? And the fact that you consider this situation in any way similar to WWI, II, Korea, or Vietnam... Offhand I would say the common milieu for any State action transcends the always peculiar details of any next one: At root: the bases for there being this particular State! Not merely the documents, Constitution and related - but our putative ethos? and the priorities which we preach at home and abroad (whether the preached-to think our sermons hypocritical? (sometimes) or merely sanctimonious! (often)). We certainly cannot claim that ~we are inured to what others think of us (though many believe we Are inured to whatever it is - which others think, period). We live! to preach our magnificence and.. deem that our prosperity is related to Our Goodness. Est-ce que ce n'est pas vrai, mon cher? Thus, all the above is mere rhetoric we amuse ourselves with, in strifeless intervals. It is in stressful periods ONLY - when we demonstrate what we Really believe. Like now. Like Ashcroft and the hubris AND fearfulness in the now litany of new Official Laws for the Millennium: in form of dictats er Executive Orders - freed from those messy constraints, tiresome details like debate, public discussion, apprising of legislators, legislation by Legislators - opinion of judiciary. Etc. Oh.. because we are in a hurry! Just as we were in a hurry, hours after after 12/7/41. Yet then, while we exaggerated the guesstimate of the loyalties of US Citizens of Japanese descent (also Italians, less so -oddly- Germans amongst us) -- at no time did we conceive of the Draconian hysterical mass of abortive intrusions into personal Rights, as are occurring in the present contretemps. Common denominators? saboteurs (real and imagined) - looking Just Like Us\ufffd or.. different (too). Unknown 'plans', schemes, capacity! to commit nefarious deeds .. like maybe blowing up [all the same stuff as now]. Need more common denominators of all the past events and our responses? {sheesh} Yeah.. this one is Different all right: as are the wildest of imaginations, Each time. Only This time: we are willing to forget at lightning pace (da capo) At root: the bases for there being* this particular State!* Kill Those to save That, but please to call it, "military necessity". Again. A. Imagine.. if Economics Principles finally ever won completely? over umm National Principles (if we still have any left next month). Imagine that world. {shudder}
Post #19,169 by bepatient 11/21/01 4:16:29 PM Reply	I can't help blindness. Nor do I intend to carry this argument alot further. If you cannot judge the differences in a) the perceived enemy and b) the extreme pervasiveness of wired/wireless communications as a support infrstructure for networked organizations....well theres not alot of point in discussing why monitoring capability is more important now than it was before. You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]

Welcome to IWETHEY!