Post #183,762
11/9/04 12:09:58 PM
|
Evidence?
Bein’ a proper scientist and all, you’ll be prepared to back up all those assertions with scads of hard, virtuous evidence, won’t you?
Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
|
Post #183,769
11/9/04 12:24:47 PM
|
Look on any creationism site
Here, I'll help you:
[link|http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&q=biologists+speak+on+evolution|http://www.google.co...peak+on+evolution]
Or here, a popularizer of biology:
[link|http://www.quotationspage.com/quotes/Stephen_Jay_Gould/|http://www.quotation...tephen_Jay_Gould/]
How about this, the thing people REALLY fear, something scientists seem unwilling to vehemently oppose on moral grounds alone:
[link|http://www.legalaffairs.org/issues/November-December-2003/review_larson_novdec03.html|http://www.legalaffa...son_novdec03.html]
Here's a physicist with no clue about physics OR biology:
[link|http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0192861980/qid=1100020722/sr=8-2/ref=pd_csp_2/102-2176562-1700167?v=glance&s=books&n=507846|http://www.amazon.co...&s=books&n=507846]
Hey, you could mosey down to the corner bookstore and look in the biology section. Here!
[link|http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0521841143/qid=1100020864/sr=1-6/ref=sr_1_6/102-2176562-1700167?v=glance&s=books|http://www.amazon.co...?v=glance&s=books]
[link|http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0679642889/qid=1100020971/sr=2-1/ref=pd_ka_b_2_1/102-2176562-1700167|http://www.amazon.co...2-2176562-1700167]
[link|http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0520240669/qid=1100021057/sr=1-22/ref=sr_1_22/102-2176562-1700167?v=glance&s=books|http://www.amazon.co...?v=glance&s=books]
The list is endless. It's all self-indulgent BS. Why should biology escape the pernicious influence of narcissistic post-modernism?
-drl
|
Post #183,770
11/9/04 12:34:10 PM
|
*wave*wave*
I said EVIDENCE.
"Some biologists wrote some books" is not EVIDENCE.
Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
|
Post #183,771
11/9/04 12:38:28 PM
11/9/04 12:44:38 PM
|
What do you want, direct quotes?
I'm at work, not the library.
The preening narcissism of society oozes out of every festering aspect of this modern world. Again - why should biology escape the trend?
"Be all that you can be - and more!"
I realize of course that what you want is *nothing*. As a fully qualified lover of this BS world, you're just being a pill for the hell of it. You couldn't care less if I supplied you with mountains of "evidence" - because what you *don't* want, what you and all your watchfully eyed brothers and sisters *don't* want, is a judgment. My *judgment* is that biologists have failed to point out the obvious - natural selection is a *theory*, with testable consequences, while "evolution" as such doesn't exist - there is no way of knowing at this time how organizations of amino acids leading to proteins emerged from some hypothetical chemical brew posited by a comet, or space aliens, or whatever, so to talk of origins is nothing but speculation. It's - gasp! - religion with another God, the one looking back from the mirror.
-drl
Edited by deSitter
Nov. 9, 2004, 12:44:38 PM EST
|
Post #183,775
11/9/04 12:54:20 PM
|
You made the unsupportable assertion.
You sort it out.
All this handwaving and personal attacking of me doesn't alter the fact that on this particular point, all you have is sweet fuck all.
Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
|
Post #183,776
11/9/04 12:56:54 PM
|
Ah right
Anything that Ross doesn't understand doesn't matter. And anyone who cares about such obscurities deserves his contempt.
News flash: there is a lot more to biology than a simple capsule statement of what evolution is, and what different aspects are captured in Darwin's theory of Evolution.
Perhaps if you had the perspective to understand why it is OK that most of the world cares so little about your corner of physics, you'd understand why your lack of caring about biology does not mean that biologists should not pursue the subject and care about it.
Cheers,
Ben
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
|
Post #183,782
11/9/04 1:27:39 PM
|
Re: Ah right
Particular results in biology, and the methods of biologists, are *irrelevant* to the simple distinction between and acutal *theory* and a *model*. *Both* sides of the "evolution vs. creationism" story are wrong, in the same way - they confuse a description for a predictive framework. Thus religion has no predictive value, and neither does "evolution", while *natural selection* certainly does.
Since this is so simple as to be trivial, the question becomes *why* is something so simple, so universally misunderstood. THAT is a failure of biologists in particular, and the entire culture of science in general.
Yours of course is the dilettante's choice - to maintain the fake richness of theoretical ideas for the purpose of making a more satisfying reflection of yourself. Had you ever actually *worked* on a real scientific project, you might understand this.
-drl
|
Post #183,788
11/9/04 2:47:51 PM
|
As you know, math is not a science
So the fact that I did real math doesn't matter. Nor do my publications.
However I've also watched my wife go through working on real science. And my comments still stand.
Oh right. Her publications are in biology. So that isn't real science in your world. In which case you can say anything you want and win because it is accepted by the highest authority that you know - yourself!
In which case attempts at conversation are useless. So I'll cease to bother.
Ben
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
|
