You should...

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #16,964 by bepatient 11/6/01 4:42:01 PM Reply	You should... ...because I've given you 2 examples. One...a statement from airport security. The other, your very own Nancy Oden...who didn't seem to get detained...according to your dictionary term. You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #16,970 by Brandioch 11/6/01 4:45:10 PM Reply	Reading WITH comprehension. No, Bill. "I do not believe this" was in reference to the fact that someone seems have managed to get this far into the thread without reading what my challnge to you was. The one you are afraid to take. Even though you keep claiming that nothing would happen. Your fear tells the truth.
Post #16,979 by bepatient 11/6/01 4:59:21 PM Reply	Sure.... so you can continue to ignore direct contradictory evidence in an effort to make me drive to the airport and attempt to crash security. Since I can read with comprehension and your challenge was to go THROUGH security without being screened...not deny additional screening. Not likely...since I have offered evidence...which you reject. SO I would say that the evidence is there for >you< to refute...not I. How far are you from Sea/Tac? You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]

thought I would move a point over here from the terr forum - (boxley) - (88) - Nov. 5, 2001, 10:40:32 PM EST

Show me where it said she refused to be scanned. - (Brandioch) - (86) - Nov. 5, 2001, 10:51:16 PM EST

The actions of the folks at the airport... - (bepatient) - (32) - Nov. 5, 2001, 11:18:40 PM EST

I wasn't aware there was a zone there. - (Brandioch) - (7) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:11:14 AM EST

do you practice being an idiot? - (bepatient) - (6) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:18:11 AM EST

Allow me to quote from that article. - (Brandioch) - (5) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:26:22 AM EST

I read that part... - (bepatient) - (2) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:31:22 AM EST

Again, you fail to fulfill the request. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:41:27 AM EST

yawn... - (bepatient) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:50:03 AM EST

Since we're being pedantic - (drewk) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:36:02 AM EST

Sure. - (Brandioch) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:43:04 AM EST

Re: The actions of the folks at the airport... - (Ashton) - (23) - Nov. 6, 2001, 02:56:35 AM EST

Give me a break... - (bepatient) - (22) - Nov. 6, 2001, 07:59:44 AM EST

Rationality is beyond you. - (Brandioch) - (21) - Nov. 6, 2001, 01:37:25 PM EST

Was she "singled out"? - (Another Scott) - Nov. 6, 2001, 02:11:14 PM EST

You keep inventing rights... - (bepatient) - (19) - Nov. 6, 2001, 02:19:46 PM EST

The odd thing - (JayMehaffey) - Nov. 6, 2001, 02:55:18 PM EST

Your fear........ - (Brandioch) - (8) - Nov. 6, 2001, 02:56:18 PM EST

yawn...again - (bepatient) - (7) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:06:49 PM EST

Quote it. - (Brandioch) - (5) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:17:58 PM EST

yawn yet again - (bepatient) - (4) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:23:32 PM EST

Like I said, you wouldn't be able to do it. - (Brandioch) - (3) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:28:52 PM EST

Since you obviously are incapable... - (bepatient) - (2) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:59:30 PM EST

Yep: that IS what 'They' said. Not what 'She' said. Again. -NT - (Ashton) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:02:01 PM EST

yep... - (bepatient) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:20:03 PM EST

Bingo! again, you betcha "according to relevant Authority" \ufffd - (Ashton) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:22:46 PM EST

This is some MORE = NEW 'rewrite' of the same. Yet: - (Ashton) - (8) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:02:56 PM EST

Question authority? - (bepatient) - (7) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:17:13 PM EST

Yes, Authority *may* have told a truer? version here. - (Ashton) - (6) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:29:20 PM EST

Really simple... - (bepatient) - (5) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:01:46 PM EST

Oh I *am* straddling both horses: You Picked Automatically. - (Ashton) - (4) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:06:32 PM EST

No we're not... - (bepatient) - (3) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:14:42 PM EST

Must straddling be explained too? - (Ashton) - (2) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:32:35 PM EST

But I've given you my reasoning... - (bepatient) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:36:20 PM EST

Sorry: I must have believed my statistics. Too. :[ -NT - (Ashton) - Nov. 6, 2001, 05:04:13 PM EST

suppose - (boxley) - (52) - Nov. 5, 2001, 11:41:55 PM EST

Police State - (Brandioch) - (51) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:01:03 AM EST

They didn't infringe upon her civil rights. - (bepatient) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:04:41 AM EST

ya gotta pick yer fights - (boxley) - (49) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:12:53 AM EST

And she picked her's. - (Brandioch) - (48) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:20:16 AM EST

Cause she's an idiot... - (bepatient) - (47) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:26:57 AM EST

You don't know what "detain" means.... - (Brandioch) - (46) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:32:38 AM EST

Sure I do... - (bepatient) - (45) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:48:34 AM EST

Reading with comprehension. - (Brandioch) - (44) - Nov. 6, 2001, 01:02:56 AM EST

Please refer to the quote... - (bepatient) - (43) - Nov. 6, 2001, 01:17:46 AM EST

Right to travel? - (andread) - (42) - Nov. 6, 2001, 11:23:09 AM EST

Thanks... - (bepatient) - Nov. 6, 2001, 01:03:59 PM EST

Um, you're posting in reply to Bill's comment. - (Brandioch) - (40) - Nov. 6, 2001, 01:53:53 PM EST

Nit - (Silverlock) - (28) - Nov. 6, 2001, 02:21:42 PM EST

SLAM! - (Brandioch) - (27) - Nov. 6, 2001, 02:58:48 PM EST

That's funny. - (Silverlock) - (20) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:09:13 PM EST

I'm glad you agree. - (Brandioch) - (17) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:15:36 PM EST

Those who will not see - (Silverlock) - (16) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:19:00 PM EST

In case of factual depletion, abandon discussion. - (Brandioch) - (15) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:34:10 PM EST

Talking past each other. - (Another Scott) - (9) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:47:26 PM EST

Nope. Looking at the whole situation. - (Brandioch) - (8) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:02:01 PM EST

You've apparently missed some things. - (Another Scott) - (7) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:16:25 PM EST

Prove it. - (Brandioch) - (6) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:23:14 PM EST

Spell it out. - (Another Scott) - (5) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:26:52 PM EST

I do not believe this. - (Brandioch) - (4) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:33:16 PM EST

You should... - (bepatient) - (2) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:42:01 PM EST

Reading WITH comprehension. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:45:10 PM EST

Sure.... - (bepatient) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:59:21 PM EST

The reason I asked... - (Another Scott) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:57:12 PM EST

Ahh...your MO... - (bepatient) - (4) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:10:51 PM EST

Compare the dates. - (Brandioch) - (3) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:25:13 PM EST

What...to your posts yesterday? - (bepatient) - (2) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:30:26 PM EST

Quote it. If you can. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:48:43 PM EST

Even if I quote it you'll ignore it. - (bepatient) - Nov. 6, 2001, 05:00:23 PM EST

Et tu Brute? - (Ashton) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:59:20 PM EST

did -NT - (boxley) - Nov. 6, 2001, 09:53:33 PM EST

Wrong. - (bepatient) - (4) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:11:21 PM EST

Ahhhh, it's another "detain" issue. - (Brandioch) - (2) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:26:00 PM EST

I see... - (bepatient) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:55:51 PM EST

Ha! (" do you practice being an idiot?") - (Brandioch) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:16:21 PM EST

How clairvoyant of you, BeeP - (Ashton) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:45:09 PM EST

didnt -NT - (boxley) - Nov. 6, 2001, 09:52:21 PM EST

She could have... - (bepatient) - (10) - Nov. 6, 2001, 02:24:02 PM EST

See above: thus far it is ALL 'formalized' hearsay of - (Ashton) - (9) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:17:51 PM EST

There are 2 accounts... - (bepatient) - (8) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:20:41 PM EST

Bill, you are telling a lie. - (Brandioch) - (7) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:31:21 PM EST

Keep nit-picking... - (bepatient) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:13:08 PM EST

"detained" - (Brandioch) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:21:31 PM EST

You need to do a little reading: - (tonytib) - (4) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:15:04 PM EST

Read my other posts. - (Brandioch) - (3) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:19:38 PM EST

She did not... - (bepatient) - (2) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:25:31 PM EST

Which was my point. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:47:47 PM EST

No it wasn't. -NT - (bepatient) - Nov. 6, 2001, 05:01:11 PM EST

heh..only thing I know is... - (Simon_Jester) - Nov. 7, 2001, 03:35:35 PM EST

Quite another Theatre of operations.
80 ms