was because her case didn't involve her trying to get through security without screening. It involved her refusing to be effectively screened.

If you disagree, please post evidence that she attempted to go through security without being screened. Until you can do so, your challenge doesn't fit the situation here. That's why I gave you the opportunity to clarify what your challenge was.

Don's post of the interview with her said that she was at the gate when she was told she couldn't get on the plane.

Was she arrested? No.

Was she allowed to fly? No, she wasn't. Because it was decided that she wasn't effectively screened (or because she was against the war, or her politics, or her bad attitude, or ..., depending on your point of view).

This doesn't seem to fit your view of what should have happened to her, or what would happen to me or BP if we did what she's accused of doing.

I think this ends my participation in this thread....

Cheers,
Scott.