Ahhhh, it's another "detain" issue.

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #16,907 by Brandioch 11/6/01 3:26:00 PM Reply	Ahhhh, it's another "detain" issue. Bill thinks that "resisted" == "refused". Just like he got all upset when I posted a dictionary definition of "detain" (but that's not what common usage is). Because she did not cooperate with the authorities, Bill's mind can't handle it. I can understand that. Resist Refuse They both start with "R". "in its popular use it means to hold for an extended period of time...while I suppose if you want to be a semantic son of a bitch (which appears to be the case) then I will grant you that security can "detain" someone while relevent authorities arrive." "...popular use..." Depends upon what group you consider "popular", I guess. If you pick the Right group, resist can mean refuse. At least as far as the Authorities are concerned.
Post #16,922 by bepatient 11/6/01 3:55:51 PM Reply	I see... ...lose the argument...attack the man. How pleasant. You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #16,939 by Brandioch 11/6/01 4:16:21 PM Reply	Ha! (" do you practice being an idiot?") "...lose the argument...attack the man." Check the date on that post of your's. Need I remind you of who had to post a dictionary definition for whom? Oh, I'm sorry. Did you men "...lose the argument...attack the man" was going to be YOUR M.O.?

thought I would move a point over here from the terr forum - (boxley) - (88) - Nov. 5, 2001, 10:40:32 PM EST

Show me where it said she refused to be scanned. - (Brandioch) - (86) - Nov. 5, 2001, 10:51:16 PM EST

The actions of the folks at the airport... - (bepatient) - (32) - Nov. 5, 2001, 11:18:40 PM EST

I wasn't aware there was a zone there. - (Brandioch) - (7) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:11:14 AM EST

do you practice being an idiot? - (bepatient) - (6) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:18:11 AM EST

Allow me to quote from that article. - (Brandioch) - (5) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:26:22 AM EST

I read that part... - (bepatient) - (2) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:31:22 AM EST

Again, you fail to fulfill the request. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:41:27 AM EST

yawn... - (bepatient) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:50:03 AM EST

Since we're being pedantic - (drewk) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:36:02 AM EST

Sure. - (Brandioch) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:43:04 AM EST

Re: The actions of the folks at the airport... - (Ashton) - (23) - Nov. 6, 2001, 02:56:35 AM EST

Give me a break... - (bepatient) - (22) - Nov. 6, 2001, 07:59:44 AM EST

Rationality is beyond you. - (Brandioch) - (21) - Nov. 6, 2001, 01:37:25 PM EST

Was she "singled out"? - (Another Scott) - Nov. 6, 2001, 02:11:14 PM EST

You keep inventing rights... - (bepatient) - (19) - Nov. 6, 2001, 02:19:46 PM EST

The odd thing - (JayMehaffey) - Nov. 6, 2001, 02:55:18 PM EST

Your fear........ - (Brandioch) - (8) - Nov. 6, 2001, 02:56:18 PM EST

yawn...again - (bepatient) - (7) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:06:49 PM EST

Quote it. - (Brandioch) - (5) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:17:58 PM EST

yawn yet again - (bepatient) - (4) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:23:32 PM EST

Like I said, you wouldn't be able to do it. - (Brandioch) - (3) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:28:52 PM EST

Since you obviously are incapable... - (bepatient) - (2) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:59:30 PM EST

Yep: that IS what 'They' said. Not what 'She' said. Again. -NT - (Ashton) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:02:01 PM EST

yep... - (bepatient) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:20:03 PM EST

Bingo! again, you betcha "according to relevant Authority" \ufffd - (Ashton) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:22:46 PM EST

This is some MORE = NEW 'rewrite' of the same. Yet: - (Ashton) - (8) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:02:56 PM EST

Question authority? - (bepatient) - (7) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:17:13 PM EST

Yes, Authority *may* have told a truer? version here. - (Ashton) - (6) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:29:20 PM EST

Really simple... - (bepatient) - (5) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:01:46 PM EST

Oh I *am* straddling both horses: You Picked Automatically. - (Ashton) - (4) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:06:32 PM EST

No we're not... - (bepatient) - (3) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:14:42 PM EST

Must straddling be explained too? - (Ashton) - (2) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:32:35 PM EST

But I've given you my reasoning... - (bepatient) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:36:20 PM EST

Sorry: I must have believed my statistics. Too. :[ -NT - (Ashton) - Nov. 6, 2001, 05:04:13 PM EST

suppose - (boxley) - (52) - Nov. 5, 2001, 11:41:55 PM EST

Police State - (Brandioch) - (51) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:01:03 AM EST

They didn't infringe upon her civil rights. - (bepatient) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:04:41 AM EST

ya gotta pick yer fights - (boxley) - (49) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:12:53 AM EST

And she picked her's. - (Brandioch) - (48) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:20:16 AM EST

Cause she's an idiot... - (bepatient) - (47) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:26:57 AM EST

You don't know what "detain" means.... - (Brandioch) - (46) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:32:38 AM EST

Sure I do... - (bepatient) - (45) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:48:34 AM EST

Reading with comprehension. - (Brandioch) - (44) - Nov. 6, 2001, 01:02:56 AM EST

Please refer to the quote... - (bepatient) - (43) - Nov. 6, 2001, 01:17:46 AM EST

Right to travel? - (andread) - (42) - Nov. 6, 2001, 11:23:09 AM EST

Thanks... - (bepatient) - Nov. 6, 2001, 01:03:59 PM EST

Um, you're posting in reply to Bill's comment. - (Brandioch) - (40) - Nov. 6, 2001, 01:53:53 PM EST

Nit - (Silverlock) - (28) - Nov. 6, 2001, 02:21:42 PM EST

SLAM! - (Brandioch) - (27) - Nov. 6, 2001, 02:58:48 PM EST

That's funny. - (Silverlock) - (20) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:09:13 PM EST

I'm glad you agree. - (Brandioch) - (17) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:15:36 PM EST

Those who will not see - (Silverlock) - (16) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:19:00 PM EST

In case of factual depletion, abandon discussion. - (Brandioch) - (15) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:34:10 PM EST

Talking past each other. - (Another Scott) - (9) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:47:26 PM EST

Nope. Looking at the whole situation. - (Brandioch) - (8) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:02:01 PM EST

You've apparently missed some things. - (Another Scott) - (7) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:16:25 PM EST

Prove it. - (Brandioch) - (6) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:23:14 PM EST

Spell it out. - (Another Scott) - (5) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:26:52 PM EST

I do not believe this. - (Brandioch) - (4) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:33:16 PM EST

You should... - (bepatient) - (2) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:42:01 PM EST

Reading WITH comprehension. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:45:10 PM EST

Sure.... - (bepatient) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:59:21 PM EST

The reason I asked... - (Another Scott) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:57:12 PM EST

Ahh...your MO... - (bepatient) - (4) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:10:51 PM EST

Compare the dates. - (Brandioch) - (3) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:25:13 PM EST

What...to your posts yesterday? - (bepatient) - (2) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:30:26 PM EST

Quote it. If you can. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:48:43 PM EST

Even if I quote it you'll ignore it. - (bepatient) - Nov. 6, 2001, 05:00:23 PM EST

Et tu Brute? - (Ashton) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:59:20 PM EST

did -NT - (boxley) - Nov. 6, 2001, 09:53:33 PM EST

Wrong. - (bepatient) - (4) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:11:21 PM EST

Ahhhh, it's another "detain" issue. - (Brandioch) - (2) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:26:00 PM EST

I see... - (bepatient) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:55:51 PM EST

Ha! (" do you practice being an idiot?") - (Brandioch) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:16:21 PM EST

How clairvoyant of you, BeeP - (Ashton) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:45:09 PM EST

didnt -NT - (boxley) - Nov. 6, 2001, 09:52:21 PM EST

She could have... - (bepatient) - (10) - Nov. 6, 2001, 02:24:02 PM EST

See above: thus far it is ALL 'formalized' hearsay of - (Ashton) - (9) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:17:51 PM EST

There are 2 accounts... - (bepatient) - (8) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:20:41 PM EST

Bill, you are telling a lie. - (Brandioch) - (7) - Nov. 6, 2001, 03:31:21 PM EST

Keep nit-picking... - (bepatient) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:13:08 PM EST

"detained" - (Brandioch) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:21:31 PM EST

You need to do a little reading: - (tonytib) - (4) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:15:04 PM EST

Read my other posts. - (Brandioch) - (3) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:19:38 PM EST

She did not... - (bepatient) - (2) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:25:31 PM EST

Which was my point. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:47:47 PM EST

No it wasn't. -NT - (bepatient) - Nov. 6, 2001, 05:01:11 PM EST

heh..only thing I know is... - (Simon_Jester) - Nov. 7, 2001, 03:35:35 PM EST

iwethey.org

IFKK
101 ms