IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Religion, Philosophy, Metaphysics Forum / no the movie was something he wanted to do
Post #146,373
by boxley
3/15/04 7:37:20 PM
Reply
New no the movie was something he wanted to do
whether it made dollar one or not. Hollywood wouldnt touch it. I admire a man who forges ahead. John Wayne wanted to make the Alamo, it didnt have the same success. Now Hollywood see's the dollar bill on the wall. What they dont realize is that the christians who are flocking to see what may be the best realistic movie about a central tenet of their religion a documentary as if you were one of the crowd. Anything else out of the bible will be hit or miss. As for me I would love to see a detailed movie wih all the fun bits being shown, the story of Job, hafta rate it XXX I imagine.
thanx,
bill
when I was young I envisioned myself as the embodiment of Trinity, Now I realize I have turned into the Bambino
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
Post #146,379
by deSitter
Picture of deSitter
3/15/04 7:56:55 PM
3/15/04 7:57:31 PM
Reply
New "Get Job!", the movie
Tagline:

"He's lost his job, his woman, and his car keys - and it isn't even 10 AM.

<cue action flick music>

"It's the worst day of his life - and it's just gotten started! It's going to get a LOT worse!"

<action flick explosions and more music>

...Mel Gibson IS Job!"
-drl
Expand Edited by deSitter March 15, 2004, 07:57:31 PM EST
Expand All History
     houghtful commentary on gibsons movie, the Passion - (boxley) - (58) - March 8, 2004, 10:12:16 PM EST
         Ever see 'Dogma'? - (drewk) - March 9, 2004, 12:38:48 AM EST
         More - anti-Jew stance still a winner - (deSitter) - (56) - March 9, 2004, 06:37:58 AM EST
             interesting point made - (boxley) - (1) - March 9, 2004, 09:06:38 AM EST
                 Ah, the Bush technique of selecting press questioners. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - March 9, 2004, 10:00:40 AM EST
             I think you've flipped. - (Nightowl) - (12) - March 9, 2004, 11:56:08 AM EST
                 C'est l'eau de Saint Louis -NT - (pwhysall) - March 9, 2004, 12:02:01 PM EST
                 Demur - (Ashton) - (10) - March 9, 2004, 06:44:12 PM EST
                     Did that help, Owl? -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (2) - March 9, 2004, 07:28:57 PM EST
                         Re: Did that help, Owl? - (Nightowl) - (1) - March 10, 2004, 01:54:16 PM EST
                             The french means, more or less - (hnick) - March 10, 2004, 02:11:57 PM EST
                     Sorry Ashton, - (Nightowl) - (6) - March 10, 2004, 01:57:50 PM EST
                         Re: Sorry Ashton, - (deSitter) - (3) - March 10, 2004, 02:16:34 PM EST
                             You forget, Ross - (Nightowl) - (2) - March 10, 2004, 02:24:10 PM EST
                                 Fair enough - (deSitter) - (1) - March 10, 2004, 02:28:44 PM EST
                                     Okay - (Nightowl) - March 10, 2004, 02:41:38 PM EST
                         There's a certain mindset in the grognard crew... - (inthane-chan) - (1) - March 10, 2004, 02:30:33 PM EST
                             Strangely.. - (deSitter) - March 10, 2004, 02:37:53 PM EST
             That's a crock, de - (cwbrenn) - (40) - March 15, 2004, 03:24:08 PM EST
                 read the book, :-) and got a question for ya - (boxley) - (2) - March 15, 2004, 03:34:51 PM EST
                     I did, in fact. - (cwbrenn) - (1) - March 15, 2004, 03:37:47 PM EST
                         good review - (boxley) - March 15, 2004, 04:03:20 PM EST
                 Re: That's a crock, de - (deSitter) - (32) - March 15, 2004, 03:43:59 PM EST
                     Re: That's a crock, de - (cwbrenn) - (25) - March 15, 2004, 03:54:57 PM EST
                         ignore - (deSitter) - March 15, 2004, 04:08:55 PM EST
                         Re: That's a crock, de - (deSitter) - (22) - March 15, 2004, 04:08:15 PM EST
                             It wasn't intended to - (cwbrenn) - (21) - March 15, 2004, 05:18:32 PM EST
                                 That wasn't my experience - (Nightowl) - March 15, 2004, 05:24:15 PM EST
                                 But Gibson has a thing with violence - (deSitter) - (19) - March 15, 2004, 05:34:19 PM EST
                                     Perhaps, but existence is not always obsession - (FuManChu) - (8) - March 15, 2004, 06:44:09 PM EST
                                         Re: Perhaps, but existence is not always obsession - (deSitter) - (7) - March 15, 2004, 06:55:09 PM EST
                                             Violence in theatre is different - (cwbrenn) - (6) - March 15, 2004, 07:29:59 PM EST
                                                 no the movie was something he wanted to do - (boxley) - (1) - March 15, 2004, 07:37:20 PM EST
                                                     "Get Job!", the movie - (deSitter) - March 15, 2004, 07:57:31 PM EST
                                                 Re: Violence in theatre is different. Addendum - (Ashton) - (3) - March 15, 2004, 08:17:13 PM EST
                                                     So then... - (cwbrenn) - (2) - March 15, 2004, 08:24:20 PM EST
                                                         It's always less risky to shoot dead messengers___:-\ufffd -NT - (Ashton) - (1) - March 15, 2004, 08:28:11 PM EST
                                                             LOL. Well writ! -NT - (cwbrenn) - March 15, 2004, 08:38:19 PM EST
                                     So what? - (cwbrenn) - (9) - March 15, 2004, 06:58:45 PM EST
                                         Ah, now that's a question, then. - (pwhysall) - (7) - March 15, 2004, 07:10:02 PM EST
                                             Re: Ah, now that's a question, then. - (cwbrenn) - (5) - March 15, 2004, 07:13:43 PM EST
                                                 You answer wisely, young Jedi :) - (pwhysall) - March 15, 2004, 07:14:43 PM EST
                                                 Forgetting DK? -NT - (FuManChu) - (2) - March 15, 2004, 07:59:30 PM EST
                                                     No, not forgetting. - (cwbrenn) - (1) - March 15, 2004, 08:08:20 PM EST
                                                         They are derivative -NT - (deSitter) - March 15, 2004, 08:10:45 PM EST
                                                 On hardcore... - (pwhysall) - March 16, 2004, 01:27:28 AM EST
                                             Black Flag, The Ramones, Richard Hell, Souxie -NT - (deSitter) - March 15, 2004, 07:46:16 PM EST
                                         Reminds me of Scratch Acid - (altmann) - March 15, 2004, 07:52:27 PM EST
                         Re: That's a crock, de - (pwhysall) - March 15, 2004, 06:50:49 PM EST
                     Re: That's a crock, de - (cwbrenn) - March 15, 2004, 05:19:46 PM EST
                     Sorry, I keep responding piecemeal. - (cwbrenn) - (4) - March 15, 2004, 05:27:34 PM EST
                         It's very simple - (deSitter) - (3) - March 15, 2004, 05:37:11 PM EST
                             Sure... a degree of sensitivity, yes - (cwbrenn) - (2) - March 15, 2004, 07:02:12 PM EST
                                 No they were plotting to kill an upstart rabbi - (boxley) - (1) - March 15, 2004, 07:11:58 PM EST
                                     Re: No they were plotting to kill an upstart rabbi - (cwbrenn) - March 15, 2004, 07:14:27 PM EST
                 Good to see you! - (pwhysall) - (3) - March 15, 2004, 06:48:27 PM EST
                     Thank you! - (cwbrenn) - (1) - March 15, 2004, 07:03:31 PM EST
                         Excellent... - (pwhysall) - March 15, 2004, 07:08:24 PM EST
                     Ditto.. and a small dot.NYET, .NIT re page: - (Ashton) - March 15, 2004, 07:36:56 PM EST

Boogity, boogity, boogity, amen!
137 ms