Only 38%, major geek

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #127,997 by ben_tilly 11/28/03 1:50:13 PM Reply	Only 38%, major geek It is amazing how many opportunities for what THEY call geekiness you lose by not being into movies or TV... Cheers, Ben "good ideas and bad code build communities, the other three combinations do not" - [link\|http://archives.real-time.com/pipermail/cocoon-devel/2000-October/003023.html\|Stefano Mazzocchi]
Post #128,003 by FuManChu 11/28/03 3:14:24 PM Reply	Quite true; also the opposite (17.55424% - Geek) How much you "become geeky" by liking movies in general. They got me on the DVD's. :) I was one of the original authors of VB, and I wouldn't use VB for a text processing program. :-) Michael Geary, on comp.lang.python

How geeky are YOU? - (pwhysall) - (57) - Nov. 28, 2003, 07:47:18 AM EST

total geek but section2 question1 - (boxley) - (1) - Nov. 28, 2003, 08:08:21 AM EST

Just a geek, 20+. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Nov. 29, 2003, 04:00:11 PM EST

Egads... I didn't think I was *that* bad... - (folkert) - Nov. 28, 2003, 09:19:12 AM EST

29.5858 - (drewk) - Nov. 28, 2003, 09:38:05 AM EST

The fact that I rushed to take this test - (tjsinclair) - Nov. 28, 2003, 09:45:08 AM EST

Unfair - (Andrew Grygus) - (7) - Nov. 28, 2003, 11:25:20 AM EST

Were you a chemistry geek? - (deSitter) - (6) - Nov. 28, 2003, 11:51:59 AM EST

Re: Were you a chemistry geek? - (Andrew Grygus) - (5) - Nov. 28, 2003, 12:17:18 PM EST

righteous! -NT - (deSitter) - Nov. 28, 2003, 12:34:07 PM EST

Remember 'NI-3' - Iodine xtals + ammon. hydroxide? -NT - (Ashton) - (3) - Nov. 30, 2003, 05:15:26 AM EST

Re: Remember 'NI-3' - Iodine xtals + ammon. hydroxide? - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - Nov. 30, 2003, 11:57:30 AM EST

Akshully: NI-3 and IN-3, the black trigger 'scab' :-\ufffd - (Ashton) - (1) - Dec. 3, 2003, 01:03:44 AM EST

What, no chlorosulphonic acid? - (a6l6e6x) - Dec. 3, 2003, 01:39:36 PM EST

Re: How geeky are YOU? - (Nightowl) - (5) - Nov. 28, 2003, 11:40:27 AM EST

You LOSE points for vi - (jb4) - (4) - Nov. 28, 2003, 12:00:01 PM EST

I raise the "Whatchyoo talkin bout, Willis" flag - (drewk) - (3) - Nov. 28, 2003, 12:01:22 PM EST

SLID3 R00LZ! -NT - (deSitter) - (1) - Nov. 28, 2003, 12:04:22 PM EST

don' you mean - (jb4) - Nov. 28, 2003, 01:19:36 PM EST

Point taken....**chuckle** -NT - (jb4) - Nov. 28, 2003, 01:23:14 PM EST

Re: How geeky are YOU? - (Yendor) - (1) - Nov. 28, 2003, 12:18:17 PM EST

Only 15% -NT - (pwhysall) - Nov. 28, 2003, 05:28:34 PM EST

Interesting HP Calc - (deSitter) - (3) - Nov. 28, 2003, 12:35:57 PM EST

Not to mention ... - (drewk) - (1) - Nov. 28, 2003, 12:43:34 PM EST

Re: Not to mention ... - (deSitter) - Nov. 28, 2003, 12:44:52 PM EST

Holy HP-65-on-steroids - (Ashton) - Nov. 28, 2003, 03:57:01 PM EST

24.65483% - Geek. -NT - (Another Scott) - Nov. 28, 2003, 01:13:48 PM EST

Only 38%, major geek - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Nov. 28, 2003, 01:50:13 PM EST

Quite true; also the opposite (17.55424% - Geek) - (FuManChu) - Nov. 28, 2003, 03:14:24 PM EST

32.92505% - Total Geek -NT - (jake123) - Nov. 28, 2003, 03:39:59 PM EST

65.8771% Geek God - (orion) - Nov. 28, 2003, 04:19:30 PM EST

43,3925% - Major Geek -NT - (Steve Lowe) - Nov. 28, 2003, 04:32:42 PM EST

As Geeks, you guys should certainly know . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (3) - Nov. 28, 2003, 05:04:22 PM EST

We're all very precisely geeky. -NT - (Another Scott) - (2) - Nov. 28, 2003, 05:23:33 PM EST

That may be, but I notice our mathematician . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - Nov. 28, 2003, 06:02:02 PM EST

I win - (deSitter) - Nov. 28, 2003, 11:01:49 PM EST

Server back up - (tuberculosis) - Nov. 29, 2003, 03:38:34 PM EST

39.64497% -- Major Geek -NT - (tangaroa) - Nov. 28, 2003, 09:14:51 PM EST

Super Geek Super Geek Super Geeky AWWWW! - (gdaustin) - (4) - Nov. 28, 2003, 11:32:19 PM EST

There were questions I couldn't answer. - (static) - Nov. 29, 2003, 12:18:08 AM EST

oops... - (Nightowl) - Nov. 29, 2003, 12:35:25 AM EST

I can think of a lot more... - (Nightowl) - Nov. 29, 2003, 12:33:43 AM EST

Well, THAT would've bumped me up a bit. - (FuManChu) - Nov. 29, 2003, 12:55:51 AM EST

48.52071% - Super Geek -NT - (inthane-chan) - Nov. 29, 2003, 08:33:23 PM EST

Y'all are (mostly) rank amateurs. - (admin) - (12) - Nov. 30, 2003, 02:55:38 PM EST

Which way should we face before bowing? -NT - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Nov. 30, 2003, 03:07:13 PM EST

Michi, of course. -NT - (admin) - Nov. 30, 2003, 03:24:52 PM EST

I prostrate myself before the Sporkidude! -NT - (Another Scott) - Nov. 30, 2003, 03:10:55 PM EST

I have to admit I was caught in a dilemma - (FuManChu) - (1) - Nov. 30, 2003, 03:33:40 PM EST

Note: - (admin) - Nov. 30, 2003, 03:35:41 PM EST

You are slightly north of east from me... - (ben_tilly) - (6) - Nov. 30, 2003, 03:55:58 PM EST

May the Holy... - (admin) - (5) - Nov. 30, 2003, 04:32:38 PM EST

Are you planning on doing the splits? - (ben_tilly) - (4) - Nov. 30, 2003, 07:22:26 PM EST

Oh no, you're mistaken. - (admin) - (3) - Nov. 30, 2003, 10:13:01 PM EST

But . . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - Nov. 30, 2003, 10:28:13 PM EST

No, the mistake is all yours - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Nov. 30, 2003, 11:15:38 PM EST

Miracles heed no legal boundaries. -NT - (admin) - Dec. 1, 2003, 09:05:45 AM EST

Not very. 18.14596% - Geek. -NT - (n3jja) - Dec. 3, 2003, 06:31:13 PM EST

iwethey.org

Laugh it up, fuzzball.
132 ms