You LOSE points for vi

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #127,973 by jb4 11/28/03 11:59:18 AM 11/28/03 12:00:01 PM Reply	You LOSE points for vi You see, geeks want to play with the latest cool stuff, and vi is neither; it is strictly...how can I say this charitably...uhhh, retrograde...(yeah, that's it...retrograde!). jb4 "There are two ways for you to have lower Prescription-drug costs. One is you could hire Rush Limbaugh's housekeeper ... or you can elect me President." John Kerry Edited by jb4 Nov. 28, 2003, 12:00:01 PM EST Expand All History
Post #127,974 by drewk 11/28/03 12:01:22 PM Reply	I raise the "Whatchyoo talkin bout, Willis" flag You see, geeks want to play with the latest cool stuff Please see the calculator thread for thorough refutation of this idea. === Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
Post #127,975 by deSitter 11/28/03 12:04:22 PM Reply	SLID3 R00LZ! -drl
Post #127,990 by jb4 11/28/03 1:19:36 PM Reply	don' you mean sly droolz? jb4 "There are two ways for you to have lower Prescription-drug costs. One is you could hire Rush Limbaugh's housekeeper ... or you can elect me President." John Kerry
Post #127,992 by jb4 11/28/03 1:23:14 PM Reply	Point taken....chuckle jb4 "There are two ways for you to have lower Prescription-drug costs. One is you could hire Rush Limbaugh's housekeeper ... or you can elect me President." John Kerry

How geeky are YOU? - (pwhysall) - (57) - Nov. 28, 2003, 07:47:18 AM EST

total geek but section2 question1 - (boxley) - (1) - Nov. 28, 2003, 08:08:21 AM EST

Just a geek, 20+. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Nov. 29, 2003, 04:00:11 PM EST

Egads... I didn't think I was *that* bad... - (folkert) - Nov. 28, 2003, 09:19:12 AM EST

29.5858 - (drewk) - Nov. 28, 2003, 09:38:05 AM EST

The fact that I rushed to take this test - (tjsinclair) - Nov. 28, 2003, 09:45:08 AM EST

Unfair - (Andrew Grygus) - (7) - Nov. 28, 2003, 11:25:20 AM EST

Were you a chemistry geek? - (deSitter) - (6) - Nov. 28, 2003, 11:51:59 AM EST

Re: Were you a chemistry geek? - (Andrew Grygus) - (5) - Nov. 28, 2003, 12:17:18 PM EST

righteous! -NT - (deSitter) - Nov. 28, 2003, 12:34:07 PM EST

Remember 'NI-3' - Iodine xtals + ammon. hydroxide? -NT - (Ashton) - (3) - Nov. 30, 2003, 05:15:26 AM EST

Re: Remember 'NI-3' - Iodine xtals + ammon. hydroxide? - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - Nov. 30, 2003, 11:57:30 AM EST

Akshully: NI-3 and IN-3, the black trigger 'scab' :-\ufffd - (Ashton) - (1) - Dec. 3, 2003, 01:03:44 AM EST

What, no chlorosulphonic acid? - (a6l6e6x) - Dec. 3, 2003, 01:39:36 PM EST

Re: How geeky are YOU? - (Nightowl) - (5) - Nov. 28, 2003, 11:40:27 AM EST

You LOSE points for vi - (jb4) - (4) - Nov. 28, 2003, 12:00:01 PM EST

I raise the "Whatchyoo talkin bout, Willis" flag - (drewk) - (3) - Nov. 28, 2003, 12:01:22 PM EST

SLID3 R00LZ! -NT - (deSitter) - (1) - Nov. 28, 2003, 12:04:22 PM EST

don' you mean - (jb4) - Nov. 28, 2003, 01:19:36 PM EST

Point taken....**chuckle** -NT - (jb4) - Nov. 28, 2003, 01:23:14 PM EST

Re: How geeky are YOU? - (Yendor) - (1) - Nov. 28, 2003, 12:18:17 PM EST

Only 15% -NT - (pwhysall) - Nov. 28, 2003, 05:28:34 PM EST

Interesting HP Calc - (deSitter) - (3) - Nov. 28, 2003, 12:35:57 PM EST

Not to mention ... - (drewk) - (1) - Nov. 28, 2003, 12:43:34 PM EST

Re: Not to mention ... - (deSitter) - Nov. 28, 2003, 12:44:52 PM EST

Holy HP-65-on-steroids - (Ashton) - Nov. 28, 2003, 03:57:01 PM EST

24.65483% - Geek. -NT - (Another Scott) - Nov. 28, 2003, 01:13:48 PM EST

Only 38%, major geek - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Nov. 28, 2003, 01:50:13 PM EST

Quite true; also the opposite (17.55424% - Geek) - (FuManChu) - Nov. 28, 2003, 03:14:24 PM EST

32.92505% - Total Geek -NT - (jake123) - Nov. 28, 2003, 03:39:59 PM EST

65.8771% Geek God - (orion) - Nov. 28, 2003, 04:19:30 PM EST

43,3925% - Major Geek -NT - (Steve Lowe) - Nov. 28, 2003, 04:32:42 PM EST

As Geeks, you guys should certainly know . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (3) - Nov. 28, 2003, 05:04:22 PM EST

We're all very precisely geeky. -NT - (Another Scott) - (2) - Nov. 28, 2003, 05:23:33 PM EST

That may be, but I notice our mathematician . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - Nov. 28, 2003, 06:02:02 PM EST

I win - (deSitter) - Nov. 28, 2003, 11:01:49 PM EST

Server back up - (tuberculosis) - Nov. 29, 2003, 03:38:34 PM EST

39.64497% -- Major Geek -NT - (tangaroa) - Nov. 28, 2003, 09:14:51 PM EST

Super Geek Super Geek Super Geeky AWWWW! - (gdaustin) - (4) - Nov. 28, 2003, 11:32:19 PM EST

There were questions I couldn't answer. - (static) - Nov. 29, 2003, 12:18:08 AM EST

oops... - (Nightowl) - Nov. 29, 2003, 12:35:25 AM EST

I can think of a lot more... - (Nightowl) - Nov. 29, 2003, 12:33:43 AM EST

Well, THAT would've bumped me up a bit. - (FuManChu) - Nov. 29, 2003, 12:55:51 AM EST

48.52071% - Super Geek -NT - (inthane-chan) - Nov. 29, 2003, 08:33:23 PM EST

Y'all are (mostly) rank amateurs. - (admin) - (12) - Nov. 30, 2003, 02:55:38 PM EST

Which way should we face before bowing? -NT - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Nov. 30, 2003, 03:07:13 PM EST

Michi, of course. -NT - (admin) - Nov. 30, 2003, 03:24:52 PM EST

I prostrate myself before the Sporkidude! -NT - (Another Scott) - Nov. 30, 2003, 03:10:55 PM EST

I have to admit I was caught in a dilemma - (FuManChu) - (1) - Nov. 30, 2003, 03:33:40 PM EST

Note: - (admin) - Nov. 30, 2003, 03:35:41 PM EST

You are slightly north of east from me... - (ben_tilly) - (6) - Nov. 30, 2003, 03:55:58 PM EST

May the Holy... - (admin) - (5) - Nov. 30, 2003, 04:32:38 PM EST

Are you planning on doing the splits? - (ben_tilly) - (4) - Nov. 30, 2003, 07:22:26 PM EST

Oh no, you're mistaken. - (admin) - (3) - Nov. 30, 2003, 10:13:01 PM EST

But . . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - Nov. 30, 2003, 10:28:13 PM EST

No, the mistake is all yours - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Nov. 30, 2003, 11:15:38 PM EST

Miracles heed no legal boundaries. -NT - (admin) - Dec. 1, 2003, 09:05:45 AM EST

Not very. 18.14596% - Geek. -NT - (n3jja) - Dec. 3, 2003, 06:31:13 PM EST

iwethey.org

An easy subject, at which very few excel!
244 ms