IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Re: Point me to all the usable non-Sun ports of Java
For a JRE, I'm rather partial to the [link|http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/linux130/?dwzone=java|IBM implementation]. Apparently their dev tools are nifty, too.


Peter
Shill For Hire
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
New *chuckle* Ya beat me to it!

Imric's Tips for Living
  • Paranoia Is a Survival Trait
  • Pessimists are never disappointed - but sometimes, if they are very lucky, they can be pleasantly surprised...
  • Even though everyone is out to get you, it doesn't matter unless you let them win.
New More usable than Sun's, faster than Microsoft's.
IBM is my JVM of choice.
Regards,

-scott anderson
     Gartner group to IIS users: RUN FOR THE HILLS!!! - (Silverlock) - (23)
         Microsoft response: Wait! No, we're, uh, REWRITING it! Yeah! - (admin) - (17)
             Joel Spolskly's response: you fools - (kmself) - (16)
                 Depends on the reason.... - (Simon_Jester) - (13)
                     along the same lines - (cforde) - (12)
                         Refactoring - (kmself) - (11)
                             rock and a hard place - (cforde) - (10)
                                 MS has a good idea - (tablizer) - (9)
                                     Re: MS has a good idea - (wharris2) - (5)
                                         Point me to all the usable non-Sun ports of Java -NT - (tablizer) - (4)
                                             Re: Point me to all the usable non-Sun ports of Java - (pwhysall) - (2)
                                                 *chuckle* Ya beat me to it! -NT - (imric)
                                                 More usable than Sun's, faster than Microsoft's. - (admin)
                                             Well, off the top of my head - (imric)
                                     Not a significant consideration . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2)
                                         Re: Not a significant consideration . . - (wharris2) - (1)
                                             Yes -NT - (Andrew Grygus)
                 Don't agree with that, either - (tonytib) - (1)
                     Indeed. - (static)
         My wife's tiny little site has been under attack - (mhuber) - (4)
             Welcome to the land of the worms. - (bepatient)
             Thanks: collecting hard #s like yours.. - (Ashton) - (2)
                 So, you want hard numbers, eh? - (mhuber) - (1)
                     Gracias - saved page. - (Ashton)

I never seen a man eat so many chicken wings!
80 ms