"any suitable methods"

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #80,660 by mmoffitt 2/10/03 3:20:05 PM Reply	"any suitable methods" YAN Quote from Gillespie (same meeting): I was in the American Embassy in Kuwait during the late 60's. The instruction we had during this period was that we should express no opinion on this issue and that the issue is not associated with America. James Baker has directed our official spokesmen to emphasize this instruction. We hope you can solve this problem using any suitable methods...All that we hope is that these issues are solved quickly. Now, who is it that's being naive?
Post #80,664 by bepatient 2/10/03 3:30:55 PM Reply	You can't read, can you. "any suitable method"...whoopie...big deal...MILTARY is off of the table for UN members...or didn't you actually read what all members agree to when they sign up. Introduce tanks into diplomatic negotiations...be advised that stated opinions >will< change. That is a guarantee. Iraq KNEW this. All the diplomats knew this. You are the only one that seems to not understand this. And its obvious that you will believe what you want...even though everyone personally involved has stated differently...even though your interpretation flys in the face of established diplomatic protocol..etc. So I see no real point in continuing this. You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #80,716 by boxley 2/10/03 5:55:51 PM Reply	James Baker issued instructions in the late 60's and in 1991 nobody bother to check to see if they had changed? thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org]
Post #80,758 by mmoffitt 2/10/03 7:52:14 PM Reply	Glaspie checked w/Baker before the meeting-thanks.

A different look at the "evidence". - (Brandioch) - (68) - Feb. 6, 2003, 10:24:46 PM EST

UN SCR 1441 says the burden's on Iraq. - (Another Scott) - (2) - Feb. 6, 2003, 10:46:09 PM EST

Let me clarify that. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 6, 2003, 11:51:07 PM EST

Thats only one aspect of many. - (bepatient) - Feb. 7, 2003, 01:59:09 AM EST

Clever bit of politics - (JayMehaffey) - (64) - Feb. 6, 2003, 10:51:52 PM EST

Re: Clever bit of politics - (dmarker) - (63) - Feb. 6, 2003, 11:14:12 PM EST

Look at the parallels. - (Brandioch) - Feb. 7, 2003, 12:02:41 AM EST

Misguided view - (JayMehaffey) - Feb. 7, 2003, 12:17:56 AM EST

Excuse me? - (bepatient) - (54) - Feb. 7, 2003, 02:04:33 AM EST

Ohhh lawdy lawdy - where do we begin - (dmarker) - (50) - Feb. 7, 2003, 02:39:36 AM EST

Start with trying to deny any of those statements. -NT - (bepatient) - (49) - Feb. 7, 2003, 07:24:36 AM EST

I'll start us off. - (mmoffitt) - (48) - Feb. 7, 2003, 12:47:09 PM EST

We've been through that too many times... - (bepatient) - (47) - Feb. 7, 2003, 02:35:52 PM EST

How do you do that? - (mmoffitt) - (46) - Feb. 7, 2003, 03:51:28 PM EST

Occam - (bepatient) - (43) - Feb. 7, 2003, 04:34:16 PM EST

I chose to believe no one. - (mmoffitt) - (42) - Feb. 9, 2003, 11:22:01 AM EST

No I don't. - (bepatient) - (41) - Feb. 9, 2003, 12:18:48 PM EST

Do you mangle everyone's statements, or just mine? - (mmoffitt) - (40) - Feb. 9, 2003, 03:53:41 PM EST

Mangle?? - (bepatient) - (36) - Feb. 9, 2003, 04:54:21 PM EST

"Reading for Comprehension" != "Conspiracy Theory" - (mmoffitt) - (35) - Feb. 10, 2003, 10:14:33 AM EST

Read the words. - (bepatient) - (33) - Feb. 10, 2003, 11:38:25 AM EST

We have no opinion on your dispute. - (mmoffitt) - (24) - Feb. 10, 2003, 11:42:09 AM EST

Because... - (bepatient) - (23) - Feb. 10, 2003, 01:54:31 PM EST

So, we're naive in addition to everything else. - (mmoffitt) - (22) - Feb. 10, 2003, 02:42:17 PM EST

Ambassadors are party contributors (you said Dolt) -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2003, 02:46:13 PM EST

Ah, but she was quoting "James Baker" then SoS. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 10, 2003, 03:08:23 PM EST

Who is "we" - (bepatient) - (19) - Feb. 10, 2003, 03:15:13 PM EST

"any suitable methods" - (mmoffitt) - (3) - Feb. 10, 2003, 03:20:05 PM EST

You can't read, can you. - (bepatient) - Feb. 10, 2003, 03:30:55 PM EST

James Baker issued instructions in the late 60's - (boxley) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:55:51 PM EST

Glaspie checked w/Baker before the meeting-thanks. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 10, 2003, 07:52:14 PM EST

Addendum. - (mmoffitt) - (14) - Feb. 10, 2003, 03:24:07 PM EST

Wow... - (bepatient) - (13) - Feb. 10, 2003, 03:42:48 PM EST

Ah.. the Pontius Pilate lateral arabesque - - (Ashton) - (12) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:19:43 PM EST

Ah...so you thought that.. - (bepatient) - (11) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:27:39 PM EST

Funny thing about our 'foresight'. Never mind '15 years' - (Ashton) - (7) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:52:43 PM EST

Whatever you say. - (bepatient) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:57:02 PM EST

Then why are we not invading Syria as well? - (boxley) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2003, 06:04:20 PM EST

Ask Bush^H^H^H^H Rumsfeld. -NT - (Silverlock) - Feb. 10, 2003, 10:52:20 PM EST

Obtuse still? *Pattern of behaviour* is the constant. -NT - (Ashton) - (3) - Feb. 10, 2003, 06:05:29 PM EST

Yes you are still obtuse. -NT - (bepatient) - (2) - Feb. 10, 2003, 06:08:48 PM EST

Missed again: I'm scalene, - (Ashton) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2003, 06:30:07 PM EST

No apparent need to do anything but repeat my previous post. -NT - (bepatient) - Feb. 10, 2003, 06:48:12 PM EST

I can't think of an exclamatory strong enough - (Silverlock) - (2) - Feb. 10, 2003, 09:51:51 PM EST

It is borne out in history... - (bepatient) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2003, 10:57:44 PM EST

Boy, there's a euphemism for you. - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 11, 2003, 07:31:47 PM EST

Oh, I see: the Market Will Correct. Right? -NT - (Ashton) - (7) - Feb. 10, 2003, 04:57:28 PM EST

What the???? possibly *babble* - (bepatient) - (6) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:10:47 PM EST

It's the laissez-faire slogan, no? - (Ashton) - (5) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:32:05 PM EST

As was thought... - (bepatient) - (4) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:55:03 PM EST

Do you even wonder why? - (Silverlock) - (3) - Feb. 10, 2003, 10:08:30 PM EST

Wrong... - (bepatient) - (2) - Feb. 10, 2003, 10:43:22 PM EST

Well that explains it - (Silverlock) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2003, 10:54:28 PM EST

"Displeased" is amorphus. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 11, 2003, 07:33:28 PM EST

A different take on AG's conversation with Saddam. - (Another Scott) - Feb. 10, 2003, 03:56:30 PM EST

Ah, I see you've met "The Strawman". -NT - (Brandioch) - (2) - Feb. 9, 2003, 05:22:01 PM EST

"The Strawman" - (orion) - Feb. 9, 2003, 06:01:18 PM EST

From you? Thats funny. - (bepatient) - Feb. 9, 2003, 06:19:07 PM EST

Exactly. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 7, 2003, 04:57:44 PM EST

So now >you< believe this bunk? - (bepatient) - Feb. 8, 2003, 10:03:39 AM EST

Well.. yeah - missin-out on Justice an all - - (Ashton) - (2) - Feb. 7, 2003, 09:19:23 AM EST

He could....... - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 7, 2003, 10:10:13 AM EST

Aren't you one of those... - (bepatient) - Feb. 7, 2003, 11:46:36 AM EST

Here's some clever politics... - (screamer) - (5) - Feb. 7, 2003, 10:24:02 AM EST

Well, let's run it up the flagpole and see who salutes - - (Ashton) - (2) - Feb. 7, 2003, 10:54:40 AM EST

Semi personal reply... - (screamer) - (1) - Feb. 7, 2003, 12:02:01 PM EST

Nam was unprecedented. - (Ashton) - Feb. 7, 2003, 12:58:14 PM EST

Got dizzy reading - (JayMehaffey) - (1) - Feb. 7, 2003, 12:19:45 PM EST

Exactly. - (Brandioch) - Feb. 7, 2003, 12:51:09 PM EST

Rain, rain, go away. I can't stand you for one more day.
310 ms