A different look at the "evidence". - (Brandioch) - (68) - Feb. 6, 2003, 10:24:46 PM EST
         UN SCR 1441 says the burden's on Iraq. - (Another Scott) - (2) - Feb. 6, 2003, 10:46:09 PM EST
             Let me clarify that. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 6, 2003, 11:51:07 PM EST
                 Thats only one aspect of many. - (bepatient) - Feb. 7, 2003, 01:59:09 AM EST
         Clever bit of politics - (JayMehaffey) - (64) - Feb. 6, 2003, 10:51:52 PM EST
             Re: Clever bit of politics - (dmarker) - (63) - Feb. 6, 2003, 11:14:12 PM EST
                 Look at the parallels. - (Brandioch) - Feb. 7, 2003, 12:02:41 AM EST
                 Misguided view - (JayMehaffey) - Feb. 7, 2003, 12:17:56 AM EST
                 Excuse me? - (bepatient) - (54) - Feb. 7, 2003, 02:04:33 AM EST
                     Ohhh lawdy lawdy - where do we begin - (dmarker) - (50) - Feb. 7, 2003, 02:39:36 AM EST
                         Start with trying to deny any of those statements. -NT - (bepatient) - (49) - Feb. 7, 2003, 07:24:36 AM EST
                             I'll start us off. - (mmoffitt) - (48) - Feb. 7, 2003, 12:47:09 PM EST
                                 We've been through that too many times... - (bepatient) - (47) - Feb. 7, 2003, 02:35:52 PM EST
                                     How do you do that? - (mmoffitt) - (46) - Feb. 7, 2003, 03:51:28 PM EST
                                         Occam - (bepatient) - (43) - Feb. 7, 2003, 04:34:16 PM EST
                                             I chose to believe no one. - (mmoffitt) - (42) - Feb. 9, 2003, 11:22:01 AM EST
                                                 No I don't. - (bepatient) - (41) - Feb. 9, 2003, 12:18:48 PM EST
                                                     Do you mangle everyone's statements, or just mine? - (mmoffitt) - (40) - Feb. 9, 2003, 03:53:41 PM EST
                                                         Mangle?? - (bepatient) - (36) - Feb. 9, 2003, 04:54:21 PM EST
                                                             "Reading for Comprehension" != "Conspiracy Theory" - (mmoffitt) - (35) - Feb. 10, 2003, 10:14:33 AM EST
                                                                 Read the words. - (bepatient) - (33) - Feb. 10, 2003, 11:38:25 AM EST
                                                                     We have no opinion on your dispute. - (mmoffitt) - (24) - Feb. 10, 2003, 11:42:09 AM EST
                                                                         Because... - (bepatient) - (23) - Feb. 10, 2003, 01:54:31 PM EST
                                                                             So, we're naive in addition to everything else. - (mmoffitt) - (22) - Feb. 10, 2003, 02:42:17 PM EST
                                                                                 Ambassadors are party contributors (you said Dolt) -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2003, 02:46:13 PM EST
                                                                                     Ah, but she was quoting "James Baker" then SoS. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 10, 2003, 03:08:23 PM EST
                                                                                 Who is "we" - (bepatient) - (19) - Feb. 10, 2003, 03:15:13 PM EST
                                                                                     "any suitable methods" - (mmoffitt) - (3) - Feb. 10, 2003, 03:20:05 PM EST
                                                                                         You can't read, can you. - (bepatient) - Feb. 10, 2003, 03:30:55 PM EST
                                                                                         James Baker issued instructions in the late 60's - (boxley) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:55:51 PM EST
                                                                                             Glaspie checked w/Baker before the meeting-thanks. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 10, 2003, 07:52:14 PM EST
                                                                                     Addendum. - (mmoffitt) - (14) - Feb. 10, 2003, 03:24:07 PM EST
                                                                                         Wow... - (bepatient) - (13) - Feb. 10, 2003, 03:42:48 PM EST
                                                                                             Ah.. the Pontius Pilate lateral arabesque - - (Ashton) - (12) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:19:43 PM EST
                                                                                                 Ah...so you thought that.. - (bepatient) - (11) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:27:39 PM EST
                                                                                                     Funny thing about our 'foresight'. Never mind '15 years' - (Ashton) - (7) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:52:43 PM EST
                                                                                                         Whatever you say. - (bepatient) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:57:02 PM EST
                                                                                                         Then why are we not invading Syria as well? - (boxley) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2003, 06:04:20 PM EST
                                                                                                             Ask Bush^H^H^H^H Rumsfeld. -NT - (Silverlock) - Feb. 10, 2003, 10:52:20 PM EST
                                                                                                         Obtuse still? *Pattern of behaviour* is the constant. -NT - (Ashton) - (3) - Feb. 10, 2003, 06:05:29 PM EST
                                                                                                             Yes you are still obtuse. -NT - (bepatient) - (2) - Feb. 10, 2003, 06:08:48 PM EST
                                                                                                                 Missed again: I'm scalene, - (Ashton) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2003, 06:30:07 PM EST
                                                                                                                     No apparent need to do anything but repeat my previous post. -NT - (bepatient) - Feb. 10, 2003, 06:48:12 PM EST
                                                                                                     I can't think of an exclamatory strong enough - (Silverlock) - (2) - Feb. 10, 2003, 09:51:51 PM EST
                                                                                                         It is borne out in history... - (bepatient) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2003, 10:57:44 PM EST
                                                                                                             Boy, there's a euphemism for you. - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 11, 2003, 07:31:47 PM EST
                                                                     Oh, I see: the Market Will Correct. Right? -NT - (Ashton) - (7) - Feb. 10, 2003, 04:57:28 PM EST
                                                                         What the???? possibly *babble* - (bepatient) - (6) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:10:47 PM EST
                                                                             It's the laissez-faire slogan, no? - (Ashton) - (5) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:32:05 PM EST
                                                                                 As was thought... - (bepatient) - (4) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:55:03 PM EST
                                                                                     Do you even wonder why? - (Silverlock) - (3) - Feb. 10, 2003, 10:08:30 PM EST
                                                                                         Wrong... - (bepatient) - (2) - Feb. 10, 2003, 10:43:22 PM EST
                                                                                             Well that explains it - (Silverlock) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2003, 10:54:28 PM EST
                                                                                                 "Displeased" is amorphus. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 11, 2003, 07:33:28 PM EST
                                                                 A different take on AG's conversation with Saddam. - (Another Scott) - Feb. 10, 2003, 03:56:30 PM EST
                                                         Ah, I see you've met "The Strawman". -NT - (Brandioch) - (2) - Feb. 9, 2003, 05:22:01 PM EST
                                                             "The Strawman" - (orion) - Feb. 9, 2003, 06:01:18 PM EST
                                                             From you? Thats funny. - (bepatient) - Feb. 9, 2003, 06:19:07 PM EST
                                         Exactly. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 7, 2003, 04:57:44 PM EST
                                             So now >you< believe this bunk? - (bepatient) - Feb. 8, 2003, 10:03:39 AM EST
                     Well.. yeah - missin-out on Justice an all - - (Ashton) - (2) - Feb. 7, 2003, 09:19:23 AM EST
                         He could....... - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 7, 2003, 10:10:13 AM EST
                             Aren't you one of those... - (bepatient) - Feb. 7, 2003, 11:46:36 AM EST
                 Here's some clever politics... - (screamer) - (5) - Feb. 7, 2003, 10:24:02 AM EST
                     Well, let's run it up the flagpole and see who salutes - - (Ashton) - (2) - Feb. 7, 2003, 10:54:40 AM EST
                         Semi personal reply... - (screamer) - (1) - Feb. 7, 2003, 12:02:01 PM EST
                             Nam was unprecedented. - (Ashton) - Feb. 7, 2003, 12:58:14 PM EST
                     Got dizzy reading - (JayMehaffey) - (1) - Feb. 7, 2003, 12:19:45 PM EST
                         Exactly. - (Brandioch) - Feb. 7, 2003, 12:51:09 PM EST