Welcome to IWETHEY!
Post #62,739
11/13/02 7:50:50 PM
|
"Security by obscurity" that is.
Alex
"I have a truly marvelous demonstration of this proposition which this margin is too narrow to contain. -- Pierre de Fermat (1601-1665)
|
Post #62,905
11/14/02 4:04:01 PM
|
I wish someone would...
...actually test security of a basic workstation install of linux (no server side services) with a basic default install of Windows.
Then...maybe...these idiots would shut up.
You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! Laurie Anderson
[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
|
Post #62,986
11/15/02 12:51:28 AM
|
Great Idea: get reporters + 2 boxes and GO ---> [sell ads]
|
White House Critical Infrastructure Task Force
- (
imric)
- (25)
- Nov. 12, 2002, 09:48:30 AM EST
Is an effing JOKE!
-NT
- (
folkert)
- (1)
- Nov. 12, 2002, 09:20:38 AM EST
haha.
-NT
- (
imric)
- Nov. 12, 2002, 09:49:36 AM EST
So many issues, so little time...
- (
Yendor)
- Nov. 12, 2002, 09:46:47 AM EST
Research? and Edward Felten's Blog
- (
deSitter)
- (2)
- Nov. 12, 2002, 10:32:45 AM EST
He calls that an "[INCORRECT ITEM:]", now:
- (
CRConrad)
- (1)
- Nov. 12, 2002, 03:27:04 PM EST
Typical lawyer
- (
drewk)
- Nov. 12, 2002, 03:46:49 PM EST
RE Chris Klaus
- (
deSitter)
- Nov. 12, 2002, 10:43:58 AM EST
He's been reading way to much of Lewis' work.
-NT
- (
bepatient)
- (9)
- Nov. 12, 2002, 11:31:26 AM EST
Lewis Carroll? C.S. Lewis?
- (
Silverlock)
- (8)
- Nov. 13, 2002, 04:56:09 PM EST
Jerry Lewis?
-NT
- (
tjsinclair)
- (7)
- Nov. 13, 2002, 05:42:40 PM EST
L.A.M.,E.?
-NT
- (
inthane-chan)
- (6)
- Nov. 13, 2002, 05:56:14 PM EST
Ding Ding Ding Ding...we have a WINNA!
-NT
- (
bepatient)
- (5)
- Nov. 13, 2002, 06:26:22 PM EST
Damn... And I was *JOKING!*
-NT
- (
inthane-chan)
- (4)
- Nov. 13, 2002, 07:24:59 PM EST
That article reminded me...
- (
bepatient)
- (3)
- Nov. 13, 2002, 07:35:29 PM EST
"Security by obscurity" that is.
-NT
- (
a6l6e6x)
- (2)
- Nov. 13, 2002, 07:50:50 PM EST
I wish someone would...
- (
bepatient)
- (1)
- Nov. 14, 2002, 04:04:01 PM EST
Great Idea: get reporters + 2 boxes and GO ---> [sell ads]
-NT
- (
Ashton)
- Nov. 15, 2002, 12:51:28 AM EST
That was predicted.
- (
Brandioch)
- (1)
- Nov. 13, 2002, 12:56:19 PM EST
#5
- (
inthane-chan)
- Nov. 13, 2002, 03:11:38 PM EST
Text?
- (
kmself)
- (5)
- Nov. 13, 2002, 03:10:46 PM EST
All gone now -
- (
imric)
- Nov. 13, 2002, 03:55:54 PM EST
"Security warning on open source"
- (
CRConrad)
- (3)
- Nov. 14, 2002, 02:01:53 PM EST
Was that a typo?
- (
drewk)
- (1)
- Nov. 14, 2002, 02:07:12 PM EST
Cut-and-pasted it, so not MY typo, anyway. But...
- (
CRConrad)
- Nov. 14, 2002, 02:20:09 PM EST
What in heck is Mr. Klaus talking about?
- (
wharris2)
- Nov. 14, 2002, 03:16:17 PM EST
Remember, people in 1900 didn't know what an atom was. They didn't know its structure.
They also didn't know what a radio was, or an airport, or a movie, or a television, or a computer, or a cell phone, or a jet, an antibiotic, a rocket, a satellite, an MRI, ICU, IUD, IBM, IRA, ERA, EEG, EPA, IRS, DOD, PCP, HTML, internet. interferon, instant replay, remote sensing, remote control, speed dialing, gene therapy, gene splicing, genes, spot welding, heat-seeking, bipolar, prozac, leotards, lap dancing, email, tape recorder, CDs, airbags, plastic explosive, plastic, robots, cars, liposuction, transduction, superconduction, dish antennas, step aerobics, smoothies, twelve-step, ultrasound, nylon, rayon, teflon, fiber optics, carpal tunnel, laser surgery, laparoscopy, corneal transplant, kidney transplant, AIDS... None of this would have meant anything to a person in the year 1900. They wouldn't know what you are talking about.
54 ms