IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Patent Wars and Antitrust Forum / He calls that an "[INCORRECT ITEM:]", now:
Post #62,484
by CRConrad
11/12/02 3:27:04 PM
Reply
New He calls that an "[INCORRECT ITEM:]", now:
[link|http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/archives/000190.html|Update (8:42 PM):]
The item below, which I am leaving here only to maintain a complete record, was INCORRECT. It was based on an inaccurate report from a reader, which was discovered when I asked the reader a few more questions. At this point there is no evidence that the Court's email was released early.
   Christian R. Conrad
Microsoft is a true reflection of Bill Gates' personality - the sleaziest, most unethical, ugliest little rat's ass the world has seen unto this time. -- [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=42971|Andrew Grygus]
Post #62,486
by drewk
Picture of drewk
11/12/02 3:46:49 PM
Reply
New Typical lawyer
At this point there is no evidence that the Court's email was released early.

It's not that the email was released early. It's that the documents which were later emailed out were posted to the court's website hours before the email was sent out. So he is technically correct that the email was not released early.
===
Microsoft offers them the one thing most business people will pay any price for - the ability to say "we had no choice - everyone's doing it that way." -- [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=38978|Andrew Grygus]
     White House Critical Infrastructure Task Force - (imric) - (25) - Nov. 12, 2002, 09:48:30 AM EST
         Is an effing JOKE! -NT - (folkert) - (1) - Nov. 12, 2002, 09:20:38 AM EST
             haha. -NT - (imric) - Nov. 12, 2002, 09:49:36 AM EST
         So many issues, so little time... - (Yendor) - Nov. 12, 2002, 09:46:47 AM EST
         Research? and Edward Felten's Blog - (deSitter) - (2) - Nov. 12, 2002, 10:32:45 AM EST
             He calls that an "[INCORRECT ITEM:]", now: - (CRConrad) - (1) - Nov. 12, 2002, 03:27:04 PM EST
                 Typical lawyer - (drewk) - Nov. 12, 2002, 03:46:49 PM EST
         RE Chris Klaus - (deSitter) - Nov. 12, 2002, 10:43:58 AM EST
         He's been reading way to much of Lewis' work. -NT - (bepatient) - (9) - Nov. 12, 2002, 11:31:26 AM EST
             Lewis Carroll? C.S. Lewis? - (Silverlock) - (8) - Nov. 13, 2002, 04:56:09 PM EST
                 Jerry Lewis? -NT - (tjsinclair) - (7) - Nov. 13, 2002, 05:42:40 PM EST
                     L.A.M.,E.? -NT - (inthane-chan) - (6) - Nov. 13, 2002, 05:56:14 PM EST
                         Ding Ding Ding Ding...we have a WINNA! -NT - (bepatient) - (5) - Nov. 13, 2002, 06:26:22 PM EST
                             Damn... And I was *JOKING!* -NT - (inthane-chan) - (4) - Nov. 13, 2002, 07:24:59 PM EST
                                 That article reminded me... - (bepatient) - (3) - Nov. 13, 2002, 07:35:29 PM EST
                                     "Security by obscurity" that is. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (2) - Nov. 13, 2002, 07:50:50 PM EST
                                         I wish someone would... - (bepatient) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2002, 04:04:01 PM EST
                                             Great Idea: get reporters + 2 boxes and GO ---> [sell ads] -NT - (Ashton) - Nov. 15, 2002, 12:51:28 AM EST
         That was predicted. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Nov. 13, 2002, 12:56:19 PM EST
             #5 - (inthane-chan) - Nov. 13, 2002, 03:11:38 PM EST
         Text? - (kmself) - (5) - Nov. 13, 2002, 03:10:46 PM EST
             All gone now - - (imric) - Nov. 13, 2002, 03:55:54 PM EST
             "Security warning on open source" - (CRConrad) - (3) - Nov. 14, 2002, 02:01:53 PM EST
                 Was that a typo? - (drewk) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2002, 02:07:12 PM EST
                     Cut-and-pasted it, so not MY typo, anyway. But... - (CRConrad) - Nov. 14, 2002, 02:20:09 PM EST
                 What in heck is Mr. Klaus talking about? - (wharris2) - Nov. 14, 2002, 03:16:17 PM EST

Sufficiently advanced so as to be indistinguishable from magic.
72 ms