IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Research? and Edward Felten's Blog
How did the then-current administrations (Harrison followed by Cleveland redux followed by McKinley/Roosevelt) deal with monopolists under the new Sherman Act? I do know that initially, the big trusts scoffed and the act was misapplied to break unions.

According to Felten's blog, the Friday ruling was posted on the court's website two hours before being announced, and while the market was open. The stock began to rise immediately.

[link|http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/|Felten's Blog]
-drl
New He calls that an "[INCORRECT ITEM:]", now:
[link|http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/archives/000190.html|Update (8:42 PM):]
The item below, which I am leaving here only to maintain a complete record, was INCORRECT. It was based on an inaccurate report from a reader, which was discovered when I asked the reader a few more questions. At this point there is no evidence that the Court's email was released early.
   Christian R. Conrad
Microsoft is a true reflection of Bill Gates' personality - the sleaziest, most unethical, ugliest little rat's ass the world has seen unto this time.
-- [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=42971|Andrew Grygus]
New Typical lawyer
At this point there is no evidence that the Court's email was released early.

It's not that the email was released early. It's that the documents which were later emailed out were posted to the court's website hours before the email was sent out. So he is technically correct that the email was not released early.
===
Microsoft offers them the one thing most business people will pay any price for - the ability to say "we had no choice - everyone's doing it that way." -- [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=38978|Andrew Grygus]
     White House Critical Infrastructure Task Force - (imric) - (25)
         Is an effing JOKE! -NT - (folkert) - (1)
             haha. -NT - (imric)
         So many issues, so little time... - (Yendor)
         Research? and Edward Felten's Blog - (deSitter) - (2)
             He calls that an "[INCORRECT ITEM:]", now: - (CRConrad) - (1)
                 Typical lawyer - (drewk)
         RE Chris Klaus - (deSitter)
         He's been reading way to much of Lewis' work. -NT - (bepatient) - (9)
             Lewis Carroll? C.S. Lewis? - (Silverlock) - (8)
                 Jerry Lewis? -NT - (tjsinclair) - (7)
                     L.A.M.,E.? -NT - (inthane-chan) - (6)
                         Ding Ding Ding Ding...we have a WINNA! -NT - (bepatient) - (5)
                             Damn... And I was *JOKING!* -NT - (inthane-chan) - (4)
                                 That article reminded me... - (bepatient) - (3)
                                     "Security by obscurity" that is. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (2)
                                         I wish someone would... - (bepatient) - (1)
                                             Great Idea: get reporters + 2 boxes and GO ---> [sell ads] -NT - (Ashton)
         That was predicted. - (Brandioch) - (1)
             #5 - (inthane-chan)
         Text? - (kmself) - (5)
             All gone now - - (imric)
             "Security warning on open source" - (CRConrad) - (3)
                 Was that a typo? - (drewk) - (1)
                     Cut-and-pasted it, so not MY typo, anyway. But... - (CRConrad)
                 What in heck is Mr. Klaus talking about? - (wharris2)

Checking if curiosity killed the cat... no
123 ms