IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Suggestions Forum / The problem with this:
Post #56,427
by admin
Picture of admin
10/12/02 10:03:50 PM
Reply
New The problem with this:
We get a lot of threads that would look like this:

\r\n
\r\n1.\r\n  1.1\r\n    1.1.1\r\n      1.1.1.1\r\n        1.1.1.1.1\r\n          1.1.1.1.1.1\r\n            1.1.1.1.1.1.1\r\n              1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1\r\n                1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1\r\n                  1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1\r\n
\r\n
\r\netc.\r\n
\r\n(And yes, I started looking into this one tonight...)\r\n
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #56,454
by ben_tilly
10/13/02 7:13:23 AM
Reply
New How about:
A numbering scheme like this?\r\n
\r\n1.a\r\n  2.a\r\n    3.a\r\n      4.a\r\n  2.b\r\n  2.c\r\n    3.a\r\n    3.b\r\n      4.a\r\n
\r\n

Sure, there are 2 3.a's out there. But it is easy to figure out which 2.? a 3.a is actually associated with.

\r\n\r\nCheers,
\r\nBen
"Career politicians are inherently untrustworthy; if it spends its life buzzing around the outhouse, it\ufffds probably a fly."
\r\n- [link|http://www.nationalinterest.org/issues/58/Mead.html|Walter Mead]
     Link to parent post. - (Silverlock) - (11) - Oct. 9, 2002, 11:45:42 PM EDT
         Noted. - (admin) - (10) - Oct. 10, 2002, 12:06:25 AM EDT
             So I have given you a challenging exercise. - (Silverlock) - Oct. 10, 2002, 12:16:24 AM EDT
             Possible alternate solution - (ben_tilly) - (8) - Oct. 10, 2002, 06:44:26 AM EDT
                 I'm almost afraid to say this - (drewk) - (2) - Oct. 10, 2002, 08:40:22 AM EDT
                     NOOOOOOOOOO!!!!! RUNAWAY! RUN-A-WAY!!! - (folkert) - (1) - Oct. 10, 2002, 09:05:22 AM EDT
                         What you almost need is a JS solution. - (static) - Oct. 11, 2002, 12:21:38 AM EDT
                 Another alternate solution... - (admin) - (4) - Oct. 10, 2002, 10:49:43 AM EDT
                     That helps, but ... - (drewk) - (3) - Oct. 10, 2002, 11:45:15 AM EDT
                         Oh, don't worry... - (admin) - Oct. 10, 2002, 11:48:48 AM EDT
                         The problem with this: - (admin) - (1) - Oct. 12, 2002, 10:03:50 PM EDT
                             How about: - (ben_tilly) - Oct. 13, 2002, 07:13:23 AM EDT

Why, that looks so dangerous - I'm sure I'll learn something wonderful!
139 ms