That helps, but ...

Post #55,978 by drewk 10/10/02 11:45:15 AM Reply	That helps, but ... Let's say I've got the following: 1 1.1 2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.3.1 2.3.2 2.3.3 2.4 2.4.1 2.4.1.1 2.4.1.2 2.4.1.2.1 2.4.2 2.5 2.5.1 2.5.1.1 2.5.1.1.1 2.5.1.1.1.1 2.5.2 If I've clicked on 2.4, I can now see that. But if I want to know what 2.5.2 is a followup to, I still have to set the cursor on it and scroll the page down to see what it lines up with. === Microsoft offers them the one thing most business people will pay any price for - the ability to say "we had no choice - everyone's doing it that way." -- [link\|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=38978\|Andrew Grygus]
Post #55,979 by admin 10/10/02 11:48:48 AM Reply	Oh, don't worry... I plan on adding alternate numbering/indentation schemes as well. This works as a stopgap, though, I think. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #56,427 by admin 10/12/02 10:03:50 PM Reply	The problem with this: We get a lot of threads that would look like this: \r\n \r\n1.\r\n 1.1\r\n 1.1.1\r\n 1.1.1.1\r\n 1.1.1.1.1\r\n 1.1.1.1.1.1\r\n 1.1.1.1.1.1.1\r\n 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1\r\n 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1\r\n 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1\r\n \r\n \r\netc.\r\n \r\n(And yes, I started looking into this one tonight...)\r\n Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #56,454 by ben_tilly 10/13/02 7:13:23 AM Reply	How about: A numbering scheme like this?\r\n \r\n1.a\r\n 2.a\r\n 3.a\r\n 4.a\r\n 2.b\r\n 2.c\r\n 3.a\r\n 3.b\r\n 4.a\r\n \r\n Sure, there are 2 3.a's out there. But it is easy to figure out which 2.? a 3.a is actually associated with. \r\n\r\nCheers, \r\nBen "Career politicians are inherently untrustworthy; if it spends its life buzzing around the outhouse, it\ufffds probably a fly." \r\n- [link\|http://www.nationalinterest.org/issues/58/Mead.html\|Walter Mead]

Welcome to IWETHEY!