So you're good with her being coerced into calling herself Clinton. Got it.

No one, not even a detractor like myself, could possibly be anything other than inspired by her undergraduate graduation speech. I see her ultimately succumbing to the pressure of reactionaries in Arkansas to stop using her maiden name as the first step in a long journey to return her to her Goldwater roots. I would have loved for her to have been our 42nd President instead of the toad to which she was and is married. But that was before she ran headlong into the owners of this country when she tried to give us universal healthcare. That, I believe, was the final nail in her undergraduate discovered progressive tendencies. She, quite simply, had those progressive tendencies beaten out of her beginning with the coerced name change and culminating in the horror show that was the big insurance, big pharma, and bankster attacks on healthcare reform that worked so well with the marching morons of this country. It was then, I believe, she decided to return to her Goldwateran roots. More is the pity. She could have been great.

Post #415,607 by mmoffitt 11/22/16 1:34:48 PM 11/22/16 1:34:48 PM Reply	So you're good with her being coerced into calling herself Clinton. Got it. bcnu, Mikem I think religion should be treated with ridicule, hatred and contempt. And I claim that right. Christopher Hitchens.
Post #415,608 by drook 11/22/16 1:36:54 PM 11/22/16 1:36:54 PM Reply	I'm good with her deciding what she wants to be called -- Drew
Post #415,637 by rcareaga 11/23/16 10:04:49 AM 11/23/16 10:04:49 AM Reply	"being coerced into calling herself Clinton" You must be mistaken. You've been telling us all year that HRC is an unreconstructed Goldwater Girl. No Goldwater Girl would require so much as a calorie of coercion, once entered into holy matrimony, to assume her owner's name. That she did not do so at once we are obliged to assume was due to entirely to absent-mindedness rather than to any so-called "feminist" consideration, which would of course be quite inconsistent with the 1964 GOP worldview from which, as you have tirelessly reminded us these many months, she has never deviated one whit. cordially,
Post #415,639 by mmoffitt 11/23/16 10:53:12 AM 11/23/16 10:54:14 AM Reply	I actually feel a little sorrow for her in that regard. No one, not even a detractor like myself, could possibly be anything other than inspired by her undergraduate graduation speech. I see her ultimately succumbing to the pressure of reactionaries in Arkansas to stop using her maiden name as the first step in a long journey to return her to her Goldwater roots. I would have loved for her to have been our 42nd President instead of the toad to which she was and is married. But that was before she ran headlong into the owners of this country when she tried to give us universal healthcare. That, I believe, was the final nail in her undergraduate discovered progressive tendencies. She, quite simply, had those progressive tendencies beaten out of her beginning with the coerced name change and culminating in the horror show that was the big insurance, big pharma, and bankster attacks on healthcare reform that worked so well with the marching morons of this country. It was then, I believe, she decided to return to her Goldwateran roots. More is the pity. She could have been great. bcnu, Mikem I think religion should be treated with ridicule, hatred and contempt. And I claim that right. Christopher Hitchens. Edited by mmoffitt Nov. 23, 2016, 10:54:14 AM EST Expand All History
Post #415,640 by drook 11/23/16 10:57:56 AM 11/23/16 10:57:56 AM Reply	Who are you, and what have you done with mmoffitt? -- Drew
Post #415,641 by mmoffitt 11/23/16 11:00:15 AM 11/23/16 11:00:15 AM Reply	:0) bcnu, Mikem I think religion should be treated with ridicule, hatred and contempt. And I claim that right. Christopher Hitchens.

Welcome to IWETHEY!