IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New In a document forged to appear as though Carper was writing a letter to Clinton
if it was forged, the indications are clear. If the dkim headers are accurate the source is accurate, if changed dkim would not resolve. Since I spent 3 years assisting the ietf in writing the specs I am comfortable in stating that forgery is extremely difficult
That was a major error in who set up the clinton private email server. plausible deniability would be extremely more difficult with dkim installed
always look out for number one and don't step in number two
New Timeline?
The Clinton e-mail server stuff was from her time as Secretary of State. She left State on February 1, 2013.

The Carper letter is dated October 3, 2016.

Whatever the security settings on her server were, they don't seem to be applicable to the rat copulating that's going on with Carper's letter nor to lots of other "leaked" (really stolen) e-mails, etc., that is somehow about how "horrible" she is, now.

Or am I misunderstanding your point?

Cheers,
Scott.
New The rats are more likely dems, how come you love repo rats but have an issue with dem rats?
always look out for number one and don't step in number two
     hey nother, did you know your donation to hrc election campaign was paying WJC legal tab? - (boxley) - (13)
         Don't be so gullible. It's beneath you. :-) - (Another Scott) - (12)
             you howl rooskies are coming!1! then call me gullable. Hack + DKIM authenticates email - (boxley) - (6)
                 Re: you howl rooskies are coming!1! then call me gullable. Hack + DKIM authenticates email - (Another Scott) - (5)
                     so wapo has clearly identified - (boxley) - (4)
                         Re: so wapo has clearly identified - (Another Scott) - (3)
                             In a document forged to appear as though Carper was writing a letter to Clinton - (boxley) - (2)
                                 Timeline? - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                     The rats are more likely dems, how come you love repo rats but have an issue with dem rats? -NT - (boxley)
             Re: Don't be so gullible. It's beneath you. :-) - (malraux) - (4)
                 Thanks. -NT - (Another Scott)
                 the attachement has the detailed invoice. I am not a lawyer - (boxley) - (2)
                     And is that what it says? - (malraux) - (1)
                         if you need a lawyer to investigate yourself you have more issues than I have -NT - (boxley)

I just know what I read in the magazines.
105 ms