So you are quite comfortable ignoring all of it because it was stolen...Ok
you howl rooskies are coming!1! then call me gullable. Hack + DKIM authenticates email
So you are quite comfortable ignoring all of it because it was stolen...Ok always look out for number one and don't step in number two |
|
Re: you howl rooskies are coming!1! then call me gullable. Hack + DKIM authenticates email
|
|
so wapo has clearly identified
The hackers, hiding behind ominous aliases like Guccifer 2.0 and DC Leaks are russian. They should notify the fbi. always look out for number one and don't step in number two |
|
Re: so wapo has clearly identified
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-documents-idUSKBN12Y2WY The FBI and U.S. intelligence agencies are examining faked documents aimed at discrediting the Hillary Clinton campaign as part of a broader investigation into what U.S. officials believe has been an attempt by Russia to disrupt the presidential election, people with knowledge of the matter said. I don't understand why you're seeming to think that it's impossible for Russia to be doing what it is accused and suspected of doing... Cheers, Scott. |
|
In a document forged to appear as though Carper was writing a letter to Clinton
if it was forged, the indications are clear. If the dkim headers are accurate the source is accurate, if changed dkim would not resolve. Since I spent 3 years assisting the ietf in writing the specs I am comfortable in stating that forgery is extremely difficult That was a major error in who set up the clinton private email server. plausible deniability would be extremely more difficult with dkim installed always look out for number one and don't step in number two |
|
Timeline?
The Clinton e-mail server stuff was from her time as Secretary of State. She left State on February 1, 2013. The Carper letter is dated October 3, 2016. Whatever the security settings on her server were, they don't seem to be applicable to the rat copulating that's going on with Carper's letter nor to lots of other "leaked" (really stolen) e-mails, etc., that is somehow about how "horrible" she is, now. Or am I misunderstanding your point? Cheers, Scott. |
|
The rats are more likely dems, how come you love repo rats but have an issue with dem rats?
always look out for number one and don't step in number two |